World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
35730
World Ranking
9262
National Ranking
4780

Elizabeth G. Nabel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth G. Nabel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 288 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Elizabeth G. Nabel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth G. Nabel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1998 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Elizabeth G. Nabel is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily centers on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a focus on surgery and molecular biology as subfields.

Their work has been published in venues including:

  • DeckerMed Family Medicine
  • DeckerMed Medicine

Recent publications by Elizabeth G. Nabel include:

  • "Testes and Testicular Disorders," published in 2020 in DeckerMed Family Medicine
  • "Testes and Testicular Disorders," published in 2020 in DeckerMed Medicine

Research topics addressed by Elizabeth G. Nabel encompass:

  • Testicular diseases and treatments
  • Sexual Differentiation and Disorders

Throughout their career, Elizabeth G. Nabel has been recognized with membership and fellowship awards, including:

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2009)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2008)
  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) (1998)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Best Publications

  • Coronary vasomotor response to acetylcholine relates to risk factors for coronary artery disease.

    J A Vita;C B Treasure;E G Nabel;J M McLenachan

  • Direct gene transfer with DNA-liposome complexes in melanoma: expression, biologic activity, and lack of toxicity in humans

    Gary J. Nabel;Elizabeth G. Nabel;Zhi Yong Yang;Bernard A. Fox

  • A Tale of Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Infarction

    Elizabeth G. Nabel;Eugene Braunwald

  • Site-specific gene expression in vivo by direct gene transfer into the arterial wall.

    Elizabeth G. Nabel;Gregory Plautz;Gary J. Nabel

  • Treatment of diseases by site-specific instillation of cells or site-specific transformation of cells and kits therefor

    Elizabeth G. Nabel;Gary J. Nabel

  • Grand challenges in chronic non-communicable diseases

    Abdallah S. Daar;Peter A. Singer;Deepa Leah Persad;Stig K. Pramming

  • Phenotype and Course of Hutchinson–Gilford Progeria Syndrome

    Melissa A. Merideth;Leslie B. Gordon;Sarah Clauss;Vandana Sachdev

  • Heme oxygenase-1 protects against vascular constriction and proliferation.

    Henricus J. Duckers;Manfred Boehm;Andrea L. True;Shaw Fang Yet

  • Dilation of normal and constriction of atherosclerotic coronary arteries caused by the cold pressor test.

    E G Nabel;P Ganz;J B Gordon;R W Alexander

  • Circadian variation of transient myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease.

    M B Rocco;J Barry;S Campbell;E Nabel

  • Cytostatic gene therapy for vascular proliferative disorders with a constitutively active form of the retinoblastoma gene product

    Mark W. Chang;Eliav Barr;Jonathan Seltzer;Yue Qin Jiang

  • Recombinant gene expression in vivo within endothelial cells of the arterial wall

    Elizabeth G. Nabel;Gregory Plautz;Frederick M. Boyce;James C. Stanley

  • Gene Therapy for Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation After Arterial Injury

    Takeshi Ohno;David Gordon;Hong San;Vincent J. Pompili

  • Recombinant fibroblast growth factor-1 promotes intimal hyperplasia and angiogenesis in arteries in vivo

    Elizabeth G. Nabel;Zhi Yong Yang;Gregory Plautz;Reza Forough

  • Identification of the Ebola virus glycoprotein as the main viral determinant of vascular cell cytotoxicity and injury

    Zhi Yong Yang;Henricus J. Duckers;Nancy J. Sullivan;Anthony Sanchez

  • Direct transfer of transforming growth factor beta 1 gene into arteries stimulates fibrocellular hyperplasia

    E G Nabel;L Shum;V J Pompili;Z Y Yang

  • Atherosclerosis influences the vasomotor response of epicardial coronary arteries to exercise.

    J B Gordon;P Ganz;E G Nabel;R D Fish

  • Endothelial to mesenchymal transition is common in atherosclerotic lesions and is associated with plaque instability

    Solene M Evrard;Laura Lecce;Katherine C Michelis;Aya Nomura-Kitabayashi

  • Evidence of endothelial dysfunction in angiographically normal coronary arteries of patients with coronary artery disease.

    Steven W. Werns;Joseph A. Walton;Henry H. Hsia;Elizabeth G. Nabel

  • Cardiovascular Pathology in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria: Correlation With the Vascular Pathology of Aging

    Michelle Olive;Ingrid Harten;Richard Mitchell;Jeanette K. Beers

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary J. Nabel
Gary J. Nabel ModeX Therapeutics
Zhi-Yong Yang
Zhi-Yong Yang ModeX Therapeutics LLC
Andrew P. Selwyn
Andrew P. Selwyn Brigham and Women's Hospital
Santhi K. Ganesh
Santhi K. Ganesh University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Francis S. Collins
Francis S. Collins National Institutes of Health
Alfred E. Chang
Alfred E. Chang University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Peter Ganz
Peter Ganz University of California, San Francisco
Valentin Fuster
Valentin Fuster Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Leaf Huang
Leaf Huang University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Zhi-Yong Yang
Zhi-Yong Yang Sanofi (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to numerous related online degree programs and career pathways. For those interested in nutrition and patient wellness, earning one of the online nutrition degrees provides a solid foundation for roles in healthcare management, dietetics, and public health.

If you’re considering healthcare leadership, enrolling in top cahme-accredited mha programs prepares you for high-level management roles within hospitals and healthcare systems. These programs focus on strategic decision-making, policy analysis, and healthcare operations—all in a flexible online format.

Registered nurses planning to advance their education may benefit from rn to bsn programs no clinicals. These programs are ideal for busy professionals seeking to expand their qualifications quickly, without additional clinical requirements.

For advanced practice, consider the shortest online dnp program. These programs allow nurses to achieve a doctoral degree faster, combining leadership and clinical expertise to drive change in healthcare settings.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth G. Nabel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles