World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel R. Fesenmaier

Daniel R. Fesenmaier

Award Badge
Business and Management
Austria
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 76 201 186 2 2 306 29023

Daniel R. Fesenmaier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel R. Fesenmaier between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel R. Fesenmaier published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2006. 2 of the 328 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2006. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 32 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 4 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1979 2025

328 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel R. Fesenmaier: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 1
1985 5
1986 1
1987 3
1988 5
1989 4
1990 3
1991 3
1992 4
1993 7
1994 6
1995 3
1996 7
1997 4
1998 6
1999 2
2000 7
2001 11
2002 13
2003 11
2004 9
2005 4
2006 32
2007 12
2008 17
2009 13
2010 10
2011 8
2012 12
2013 15
2014 21
2015 11
2016 13
2017 16
2018 5
2019 4
2020 1
2021 4
2022 7
2023 3
2024 1
2025 1
Total 328
Download as CSV

Daniel R. Fesenmaier publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel R. Fesenmaier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 305–309 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 306 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13 306
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel R. Fesenmaier D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel R. Fesenmaier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13 76
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in Austria Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Business and Management in Austria Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Business and Management in Austria Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Business and Management in Austria Leader Award

Overview

Daniel R. Fesenmaier is affiliated with MODUL University Vienna in Austria. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and business, management, and accounting, with a focus on several subfields including sociology and political science, marketing, food science, and health informatics.

Their scholarly work covers diverse aspects of tourism research and integrates topics related to digital marketing and social media, consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification, the sharing economy and platforms, culinary culture and tourism, as well as artificial intelligence in healthcare and education.

Frequent publication venues where Daniel R. Fesenmaier has contributed include:

  • Annals of Tourism Research
  • Journal of Destination Marketing & Management
  • Journal of Travel Research
  • Industrial Management & Data Systems

Some of their recent papers, listed with publication year and venue, are:

  • "Smart Tourism Design: Launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on designing tourism places," 2021, Annals of Tourism Research
  • "Managing the structure of tourism experiences: Foundations for tourism design," 2020, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management
  • "Knowledge Creation in Information Technology and Tourism: A Critical Reflection and an Outlook for the Future," 2020, Journal of Travel Research
  • "AI, ChatGPT and the university," 2023, Annals of Tourism Research
  • "Designing an advanced system for destination management: a case study of Northern Indiana," 2020, Industrial Management & Data Systems

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Zheng Xiang
  • Jason L. Stienmetz
  • Jeongmi Kim
  • Hannes Werthner
  • Karl Wöber

Best Publications

  • Pictorial element of destination in image formation

    Kelly J MacKay;Daniel R Fesenmaier

  • Risk Perceptions and Pleasure Travel: An Exploratory Analysis:

    Wesley S. Roehl;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • The Role of Smartphones in Mediating the Touristic Experience

    Dan Wang;Sangwon Park;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Mediating tourist experiences: access to places via shared videos.

    Iis P. Tussyadiah;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Information technology and consumer behavior in travel and tourism: insights from travel planning using the internet.

    Zheng Xiang;Vincent P. Magnini;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Factors for success in rural tourism development.

    Suzanne Wilson;Daniel R. Fesenmaier;Julie Fesenmaier;John C. Van Es

  • Towards understanding members’ general participation in and active contribution to an online travel community

    Youcheng Wang;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Defining the virtual tourist community: implications for tourism marketing

    Youcheng Wang;Quaehee Yu;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Expanding the functional information search model

    Christine A. Vogt;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Smartphone Use in Everyday Life and Travel

    Dan Wang;Zheng Xiang;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Online information search: vacation planning process.

    Bing Pan;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Searching for the Future: Challenges Faced by Destination Marketing Organizations

    Ulrike Gretzel;Daniel R. Fesenmaier;Sandro Formica;Joseph T. O’Leary

  • Preparing for the New Economy: Advertising Strategies and Change in Destination Marketing Organizations

    Ulrike Gretzel;Yu-Lan Yuan;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • CONCEPTUALIZATION OF MULTI- DESTINATION PLEASURE TRIPS

    Chi-Chuan Lue;John L. Crompton;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Collaborative destination marketing: A case study of Elkhart county, Indiana

    Youcheng Wang;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Modeling Participation in an Online Travel Community

    Youcheng Wang;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Adapting to the mobile world: A model of smartphone use

    Dan Wang;Zheng Xiang;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • An Exploration of Cross-Cultural Destination Image Assessment

    Kelly J. MacKay;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Assessing Motivation of Contribution in Online Communities: An Empirical Investigation of an Online Travel Community

    Youcheng Wang;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Adapting to the Internet Trends in Travelers’ Use of the Web for Trip Planning

    Zheng Xiang;Dan Wang;Joseph T. O’Leary;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

  • Persuasive Design of Destination Web Sites: An Analysis of First Impression

    Heejun Kim;Daniel R. Fesenmaier

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrike Gretzel
Ulrike Gretzel University of Southern California
Zheng Xiang
Zheng Xiang Virginia Tech
Pierre Benckendorff
Pierre Benckendorff University of Queensland
Iis P. Tussyadiah
Iis P. Tussyadiah University of Surrey
Bing Pan
Bing Pan Pennsylvania State University
Muzaffer Uysal
Muzaffer Uysal University of Massachusetts Amherst
Joseph T. O'Leary
Joseph T. O'Leary Colorado State University
Youcheng Wang
Youcheng Wang University of Central Florida
Christine A. Vogt
Christine A. Vogt Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies in the USA opens doors to diverse academic options and career trajectories. Today, students can access top-notch programs from anywhere in the world, thanks to the rise of online education. A major concern for many is cost, but there are cheap online masters programs that make advanced education more accessible without sacrificing quality.

For those interested in data-driven decision-making, specialized online data science programs blend business management with analytics—preparing graduates for in-demand roles in today’s digital economy. Ambitious professionals seeking leadership positions may consider an online phd in leadership, which equips students with high-level strategic and organizational skills.

When choosing where to study, the best online universities stand out for their accreditation, faculty expertise, and flexible learning formats, ensuring a solid foundation for future success. These pathways empower learners to build valuable skills and advance their careers—all from the flexibility of online study.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel R. Fesenmaier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles