World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
70
Citations
51282
World Ranking
1818
National Ranking
923

Patrick J. Flynn publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick J. Flynn sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 304 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Patrick J. Flynn D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick J. Flynn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to biometric identification
  • 2011 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2009 - ACM Senior Member
  • 2006 - Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) For contributions to research in three-dimensional object recognition systems and biometrics.

Overview

Patrick J. Flynn is affiliated with the University of Notre Dame in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focused on computer science, medicine, and engineering. Within these areas, they have contributed notably to biomedical engineering, computer vision and pattern recognition, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, signal processing, and surgery.

Their recent research outputs include papers published in diverse venues. Notable recent publications are:

  • Unifying frame rate and temporal dilations for improved remote pulse detection, 2021, Computer Vision and Image Understanding
  • Fast Local Spatial Verification for Feature-Agnostic Large-Scale Image Retrieval, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • Post-Mortem Iris Recognition-A Survey and Assessment of the State of the Art, 2020, IEEE Access
  • Transformation-Aware Embeddings for Image Provenance, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
  • Deception Detection and Remote Physiological Monitoring: A Dataset and Baseline Experimental Results, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Biometrics Behavior and Identity Science

Their publication venues reflect a focus on computer vision, biometrics, and biomedical applications. Frequently published venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Biometrics Behavior and Identity Science
  • Computer Vision and Image Understanding
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Prominent co-authors in their research circle include Adam Czajka, Nathan Vance, Kevin W. Bowyer, Jeremy Speth, and Walter J. Scheirer. These collaborations have led to sustained research contributions over several years in areas influenced by biometric identification and computer vision.

The topics Patrick J. Flynn often investigates include non-invasive vital sign monitoring, biometric identification and security, ECG monitoring and analysis, hemodynamic monitoring and therapy, heart rate variability and autonomic control, forensic and genetic research, and digital media forensic detection.

In addition to journal publications, Flynn has authored a book titled Learner-Focused Feedback: 19 Strategies to Observe for Impact, published in 2020 by Corwin eBooks.

Throughout their career, Flynn has received several recognitions, including being named an IEEE Fellow in 2012 for contributions to biometric identification. Additional accolades include selection as an ACM Distinguished Member in 2011 and ACM Senior Member in 2009. In 2006, they were appointed Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) for contributions to research in three-dimensional object recognition systems and biometrics.

Best Publications

  • Data clustering: a review

    A. K. Jain;M. N. Murty;P. J. Flynn

  • A 20th Anniversary Survey: Introduction to 'Content-Based Image Retrieval at the End of the Early Years'

    Unknown

  • Overview of the face recognition grand challenge

    P.J. Phillips;P.J. Flynn;T. Scruggs;K.W. Bowyer

  • Handbook of Biometrics

    Anil K. Jain;Patrick Flynn;Arun A. Ross

  • A survey of approaches and challenges in 3D and multi-modal 3D+2D face recognition

    Kevin W. Bowyer;Kyong Chang;Patrick Flynn

  • An experimental comparison of range image segmentation algorithms

    A. Hoover;G. Jean-Baptiste;X. Jiang;P.J. Flynn

  • Image understanding for iris biometrics: A survey

    Kevin W. Bowyer;Karen Hollingsworth;Patrick J. Flynn

  • A Survey Of Free-Form Object Representation and Recognition Techniques

    Richard J. Campbell;Patrick J. Flynn

  • FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 large-scale results

    P Jonathon Phillips;W Todd Scruggs;Alice J O'Toole;Patrick J Flynn

  • An evaluation of multimodal 2D+3D face biometrics

    K.I. Chang;K.W. Bowyer;P.J. Flynn

  • Multiple Nose Region Matching for 3D Face Recognition under Varying Facial Expression

    K.I. Chang;W. Bowyer;P.J. Flynn

  • FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 Large-Scale Experimental Results

    P.J. Phillips;W.T. Scruggs;A.J. O'Toole;P.J. Flynn

  • Face Recognition Using 2D and 3D Facial Data

    Kyong I. Chang;Kevin W. Bowyer;Patrick J. Flynn

  • On reliable curvature estimation

    P.J. Flynn;A.K. Jain

  • A Region Ensemble for 3-D Face Recognition

    T.C. Faltemier;K.W. Bowyer;P.J. Flynn

  • The Best Bits in an Iris Code

    K.P. Hollingsworth;K.W. Bowyer;P.J. Flynn

  • Finger surface as a biometric identifier

    Damon L. Woodard;Patrick J. Flynn

  • Experiments with an improved iris segmentation algorithm

    X. Liu;K.W. Bowyer;P.J. Flynn

  • IR and visible light face recognition

    Xin Chen;Patrick J. Flynn;Kevin W. Bowyer

  • CAD-based computer vision: from CAD models to relational graphs

    P.J. Flynn;A.K. Jain

  • BONSAI: 3D object recognition using constrained search

    P.J. Flynn;A.K. Jain

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin W. Bowyer
Kevin W. Bowyer University of Notre Dame
Anil K. Jain
Anil K. Jain Michigan State University
P. Jonathon Phillips
P. Jonathon Phillips National Institute of Standards and Technology
Douglas Thain
Douglas Thain University of Notre Dame
J. Ross Beveridge
J. Ross Beveridge Colorado State University
Alice J. O'Toole
Alice J. O'Toole The University of Texas at Dallas
Christian Poellabauer
Christian Poellabauer Florida International University
Walter J. Scheirer
Walter J. Scheirer University of Notre Dame
Bruce A. Draper
Bruce A. Draper Colorado State University
Domingo Mery
Domingo Mery Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees. For those inclined toward engineering, exploring the mechanical engineering cost of education can help you find affordable options without compromising on quality.

If your interests lean toward science, the best online physics degree programs are now accessible and recognized by employers. This pathway is perfect for individuals passionate about theoretical and applied physics fields.

Data science continues to be a high-demand career. Reviewing top data science programs can help you gain actionable skills in machine learning, analytics, and big data from respected online institutions.

Meanwhile, tech-driven industries are also seeking graduates in electrical engineering. Finding the best online electrical engineering programs USA ensures you receive strong technical training that can lead to jobs in cutting-edge sectors.

By considering these related pathways, students can broaden their expertise and pursue diverse, future-proof career opportunities in the ever-evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick J. Flynn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles