World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
62
Citations
36080
World Ranking
2820
National Ranking
1394

P. Jonathon Phillips publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where P. Jonathon Phillips sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 168 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

P. Jonathon Phillips D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where P. Jonathon Phillips sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) For contributions to face recognition and evaluation methodologies.

Overview

P. Jonathon Phillips is affiliated with the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the United States. Their research is primarily situated in the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions to subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's work spans several main topics related to facial analysis and recognition technologies. These topics include Face Recognition and Analysis, Face Recognition and Perception, Biometric Identification and Security, Face and Expression Recognition, Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology, and Advanced Statistical Methods and Models.

Phillips has published extensively, with recent papers covering a range of relevant subjects. Notable publications include:

  • "Four Principles of Explainable AI as Applied to Biometrics and Facial Forensic Algorithms," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Accuracy Comparison Across Face Recognition Algorithms: Where Are We on Measuring Race Bias?" 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biometrics Behavior and Identity Science
  • "Forensic facial examiners versus super-recognizers: Evaluating behavior beyond accuracy," 2022, Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • "Face identification proficiency test designed using item response theory," 2023, Behavior Research Methods
  • "Order-Constrained ROC Regression With Application to Facial Recognition," 2020, Technometrics

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Vision, Applied Cognitive Psychology, IEEE Transactions on Biometrics Behavior and Identity Science, and Behavior Research Methods.

Throughout their career, Phillips has collaborated repeatedly with several coauthors. Frequent collaborators include Alice J. O'Toole, Amy N. Yates, Géraldine Jeckeln, Carina A. Hahn, and Jacqueline G. Cavazos.

Recognition for their contributions includes being named a Fellow of the International Association for Pattern Recognition (IAPR) in 2008, specifically for contributions to face recognition and evaluation methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Face recognition: A literature survey

    W. Zhao;R. Chellappa;P. J. Phillips;A. Rosenfeld

  • The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms

    Unknown

  • The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms

    P.Jonathon Phillips;Harry Wechsler;Jeffery Huang;Patrick J. Rauss

  • Overview of the face recognition grand challenge

    P.J. Phillips;P.J. Flynn;T. Scruggs;K.W. Bowyer

  • The humanID gait challenge problem: data sets, performance, and analysis

    S. Sarkar;P.J. Phillips;Z. Liu;I.R. Vega

  • FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 large-scale results

    P Jonathon Phillips;W Todd Scruggs;Alice J O'Toole;Patrick J Flynn

  • Computational and performance aspects of PCA-based face-recognition algorithms.

    Hyeonjoon Moon;P Jonathon Phillips

  • Support Vector Machines Applied to Face Recognition

    P. Jonathon Phillips

  • Face recognition accuracy of forensic examiners, superrecognizers, and face recognition algorithms.

    P. Jonathon Phillips;Amy N. Yates;Ying Hu;Carina A. Hahn

  • FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 Large-Scale Experimental Results

    P.J. Phillips;W.T. Scruggs;A.J. O'Toole;P.J. Flynn

  • Face Recognition Vendor Test 2002: Evaluation Report

    P Jonathon Phillips;Patrick Grother;Ross J Micheals;Duane M Blackburn

  • The gait identification challenge problem: data sets and baseline algorithm

    P.J. Phillips;S. Sarkar;I. Robledo;P. Grother

  • Mixture of experts for classification of gender, ethnic origin, and pose of human faces

    S. Gutta;J.R.J. Huang;P. Jonathon;H. Wechsler

  • Face Recognition Algorithms Surpass Humans Matching Faces Over Changes in Illumination

    A.J. O'Toole;P.J. Phillips;Fang Jiang;J. Ayyad

  • The Feret Verification Testing Protocol for Face Recognition Algorithms

    Syed A. Rizvi;P. Jonathon Phillips;Hyeonjoon Moon

  • Overview of the Multiple Biometrics Grand Challenge

    P. Jonathon Phillips;Patrick J. Flynn;J. Ross Beveridge;W. Todd Scruggs

  • The challenge of face recognition from digital point-and-shoot cameras

    J. Ross Beveridge;P. Jonathon Phillips;David S. Bolme;Bruce A. Draper

  • Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison.

    David White;P. Jonathon Phillips;Carina A. Hahn;Matthew Hill

  • An introduction to the good, the bad, & the ugly face recognition challenge problem

    P. Jonathon Phillips;J. Ross Beveridge;Bruce A. Draper;Geof Givens

  • Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis

    Nicholas Furl;P. Jonathon Phillips;Alice J. O'Toole

  • Report on the Evaluation of 2D Still-Image Face Recognition Algorithms

    Patrick J. Grother;George W. Quinn;P. Jonathon Phillips

Frequent Co-Authors

Alice J. O'Toole
Alice J. O'Toole The University of Texas at Dallas
J. Ross Beveridge
J. Ross Beveridge Colorado State University
Bruce A. Draper
Bruce A. Draper Colorado State University
Rama Chellappa
Rama Chellappa Johns Hopkins University
Patrick J. Flynn
Patrick J. Flynn University of Notre Dame
Kevin W. Bowyer
Kevin W. Bowyer University of Notre Dame
Vishal M. Patel
Vishal M. Patel Johns Hopkins University
Fang Jiang
Fang Jiang Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Patrick J. Grother
Patrick J. Grother National Institute of Standards and Technology
Hervé Abdi
Hervé Abdi The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways. Many students begin their journey at one of the most popular online colleges, which offer flexibility and a wide range of accredited programs.

For those interested in creative technology, a video game design degree is a great way to enter the gaming industry. These programs focus on interactive media, programming, and design, making them ideal for future game developers and designers.

Cybersecurity remains a top priority across industries. If protecting networks and data is your calling, consider a cyber security online degree cost to find affordable options in this fast-growing field.

Computer Science skills are also highly valuable in project-oriented fields. Pursuing a construction management degree can combine technology with leadership, preparing graduates for roles in managing large-scale projects.

Each of these online programs can lead to dynamic, rewarding tech-based careers, providing flexibility and specialized skills for today’s digital world.

Best Scientists Citing P. Jonathon Phillips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles