World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 74 1213 36 121 39146

Andrée Dierich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrée Dierich between 1975 and 2014, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrée Dierich published across 40 years, from 1975 to 2014, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1996. 1 of the 128 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2014. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1996. 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 6 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication
1975 2014

128 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrée Dierich: publications per year, 1975 to 2014
Year Publications
1975 2
1976 1
1977 0
1978 2
1979 1
1980 6
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 2
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 3
1992 2
1993 9
1994 8
1995 3
1996 12
1997 6
1998 9
1999 6
2000 10
2001 4
2002 10
2003 6
2004 4
2005 2
2006 8
2007 1
2008 1
2009 1
2010 2
2011 0
2012 2
2013 0
2014 1
Total 128
Download as CSV

Andrée Dierich publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrée Dierich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 117–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 121 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177 121
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrée Dierich D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrée Dierich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89 74
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrée Dierich is affiliated with the Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology in France. Their work is situated within an academic environment that focuses on advanced genetic and cellular studies.

Details about their recent research publications, co-authors, and specific fields of study are not available. There is also no recorded data on frequent publication venues or book publications associated with their name.

Information concerning main topics of work or subfields of study has not been provided.

No awards or honors have been documented for this scientist.

The absence of data on research output or areas of specialization limits the extent of detail that can be presented about their academic contributions.

Best Publications

  • Projection of an Immunological Self Shadow Within the Thymus by the Aire Protein

    Mark S. Anderson;Emily S. Venanzi;Ludger Klein;Zhibin Chen

  • Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the mu-opioid-receptor gene.

    Hans W. D. Matthes;Rafael Maldonado;Frédéric Simonin;Olga Valverde

  • neurogenin3 is required for the development of the four endocrine cell lineages of the pancreas

    Gérard Gradwohl;Andrée Dierich;Marianne LeMeur;François Guillemot

  • Effect of single and compound knockouts of estrogen receptors alpha (ERalpha) and beta (ERbeta) on mouse reproductive phenotypes.

    S. Dupont;A. Krust;A. Gansmuller;A. Dierich

  • Requirement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in recovery from DNA damage in mice and in cells

    Josiane Ménissier de Murcia;Claude Niedergang;Carlotta Trucco;Michèle Ricoul

  • Enhanced aggressive behavior in mice lacking 5-HT1B receptor

    Frédéric Saudou;Djamel Aït Amara;Andrée Dierich;Marianne LeMeur

  • Mice lacking MHC class II molecules

    Dominic Cosgrove;David Gray;Andrée Dierich;Jim Kaufman

  • Impairing follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) signaling in vivo: Targeted disruption of the FSH receptor leads to aberrant gametogenesis and hormonal imbalance

    Andrée Dierich;M. Ram Sairam;Lucia Monaco;Gian Maria Fimia

  • Function of the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) during development (I). Craniofacial and skeletal abnormalities in RAR double mutants

    D. Lohnes;M. Mark;C. Mendelsohn;P. Dolle

  • Distinct functions of the two isoforms of dopamine D2 receptors

    Alessandro Usiello;Ja Hyun Baik;Françoise Rougé-Pont;Roberto Picetti

  • A homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene

    Filippo M. Rijli;Filippo M. Rijli;Manuel Mark;Manuel Mark;Sudhakar Lakkaraju;Sudhakar Lakkaraju;Andrée Dierich;Andrée Dierich

  • Function of retinoic acid receptor γ in the mouse

    David Lohnes;Philippe Kastner;Philippe Kastner;Andrée Dierich;Andrée Dierich;Manuel Mark;Manuel Mark

  • Parkinsonian-like locomotor impairment in mice lacking dopamine D2 receptors.

    Ja Hyun Baik;Roberto Picetti;Adolfo Saiardi;Graziella Thiriet

  • Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression

    Thomas Lufkin;Andrée Dierich;Andrée Dierich;Marianne LeMeur;Marianne LeMeur;Manuel Mark;Manuel Mark

  • Mice deficient for delta- and mu-opioid receptors exhibit opposing alterations of emotional responses

    Dominique Filliol;Sandy Ghozland;Johanna Chluba;Miguel Martin

  • Absence of integrin alpha 6 leads to epidermolysis bullosa and neonatal death in mice.

    E Georges-Labouesse;N Messaddeq;G Yehia;L Cadalbert

  • Functional interaction between PARP-1 and PARP-2 in chromosome stability and embryonic development in mouse

    Josiane Ménissier de Murcia;Michelle Ricoul;Laurence Tartier;Claude Niedergang

  • Spermiogenesis deficiency and germ-cell apoptosis in CREM-mutant mice

    François Nantel;Lucia Monaco;Nicholas S. Foulkes;Denis Masquilier

  • High postnatal lethality and testis degeneration in retinoic acid receptor alpha mutant mice.

    Thomas Lufkin;David Lohnes;Manuel Mark;Andree Dierich

  • Defective platelet aggregation and increased resistance to thrombosis in purinergic P2Y1 receptor–null mice

    Catherine Léon;Béatrice Hechler;Monique Freund;Anita Eckly

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre Chambon
Pierre Chambon Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Marianne LeMeur
Marianne LeMeur Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Manuel Mark
Manuel Mark Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Pascal Dollé
Pascal Dollé Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Paul Mandel
Paul Mandel Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Philippe Kastner
Philippe Kastner Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology
Diane Mathis
Diane Mathis Harvard University
Christophe Benoist
Christophe Benoist Harvard University
Thomas Lufkin
Thomas Lufkin Clarkson University
Cathy Mendelsohn
Cathy Mendelsohn Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology can open doors to numerous interdisciplinary fields. Many students consider related career pathways such as counseling, psychology, or human services. With flexible education options on the rise, you can boost your credentials entirely online.

If you're interested in supporting others through change or mental health challenges, you might consider the cheapest online master's in counseling programs to begin your journey. These programs blend scientific understanding with people-focused skills, making them a good option for science graduates.

For those drawn to mental health assessment or research, an clinical psychology online degree offers a flexible and in-depth pathway. These programs build on core science skills while preparing you for work in various clinical and research settings.

Alternatively, a human services online degree can help you enter roles focused on community support, case management, or social advocacy. For educators, switching fields is possible: learn how to move from the classroom to therapy with resources like teacher to slp.

Best Scientists Citing Andrée Dierich

Recently Published Articles