World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
53
Citations
8539
World Ranking
1836
National Ranking
480

William S. Conway publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William S. Conway sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 116 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

William S. Conway D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William S. Conway sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Biocontrol of Listeria monocytogenes on Fresh-Cut Produce by Treatment with Lytic Bacteriophages and a Bacteriocin

    Britta Leverentz;William S. Conway;Mary J. Camp;Wojciech J. Janisiewicz

  • Examination of Bacteriophage as a Biocontrol Method for Salmonella on Fresh-Cut Fruit: A Model Study

    Britta Leverentz;William S. Conway;Zemphira Alavidze;Wojciech J. Janisiewicz

  • Physicochemical properties and bioactivity of fungal chitin and chitosan.

    Tao Wu;Svetlana Zivanovic;F. Ann Draughon;William S. Conway

  • The Role of Calcium and Nitrogen in Postharvest Quality and Disease Resistance of Apples

    Esmaeil Fallahi;William S. Conway;Kenneth D. Hickey;Carl E. Sams

  • Relationship Between Host Acidification and Virulence of Penicillium spp. on Apple and Citrus Fruit.

    Dov Prusky;James L. McEvoy;Robert Saftner;William S. Conway

  • Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on fresh-cut apple tissue and its potential for transmission by fruit flies

    W. J. Janisiewicz;W. S. Conway;M. W. Brown;G. M. Sapers

  • Local modulation of host pH by Colletotrichum species as a mechanism to increase virulence.

    Dov Prusky;James L. McEvoy;Britta Leverentz;William S. Conway

  • Effectiveness of bacteriophages in reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7 on fresh-cut cantaloupes and lettuce.

    Manan Sharma;Jitendra R. Patel;William S. Conway;Sean Ferguson

  • Optimizing concentration and timing of a phage spray application to reduce Listeria monocytogenes on honeydew melon tissue.

    Britta Leverentz;William S. Conway;Wojciech Janisiewicz;Mary J. Camp

  • Determination of free chlorine concentrations needed to prevent Escherichia coli O157:H7 cross-contamination during fresh-cut produce wash.

    Yaguang Luo;Xiangwu Nou;Yang Yang;Isabel Alegre

  • Calcium treatment of apples and potatoes to reduce postharvest decay.

    W. S. Conway;C. E. Sams;R. G. Mcguire;A. Kelman

  • ADDITIVE EFFECTS OF POSTHARVEST CALCIUM AND HEAT TREATMENT ON REDUCING DECAY AND MAINTAINING QUALITY IN APPLES

    William S. Conway;Carl E. Sams;Chien Yi Wang;Judith A. Abbott

  • The effects of postharvest infiltration of calcium, magnesium, or strontium on decay, firmness, respiration, and ethylene production in apples

    W. S Conway;C. E Sams

  • PRE- AND POSTHARVEST CALCIUM TREATMENT OF APPLE FRUIT AND ITS EFFECT ON QUALITY

    W.S. Conway;C.E. Sams;K.D. Hickey

  • Firmness and decay of apples following postharvest pressure infiltration of calcium and heat treatment

    Carl E. Sams;William S. Conway;Judith A. Abbott;Russell J. Lewis

  • Biocontrol of the Food-Borne Pathogens Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica Serovar Poona on Fresh-Cut Apples with Naturally Occurring Bacterial and Yeast Antagonists

    Britta Leverentz;William S. Conway;Wojciech Janisiewicz;Maribel Abadias

  • Chemical changes in the cortical tissue and cell walls of calcium-infiltrated ‘Golden Delicious’ apples during storage

    Catherine O Chardonnet;Craig S Charron;Carl E Sams;William S Conway

  • Integrating heat treatment, biocontrol and sodium bicarbonate to reduce postharvest decay of apple caused by Colletotrichum acutatum and Penicillium expansum

    William S. Conway;Britta Leverentz;Wojciech J. Janisiewicz;Amy B. Blodgett

  • Survival and Growth of Listeria monocytogenes on Fresh-Cut Apple Slices and Its Interaction with Glomerella cingulata and Penicillium expansum

    William S Conway;Britta Leverentz;Robert A Saftner;Wojciech J Janisiewicz

  • Postharvest Calcium Treatment of Apple Fruit to Provide Broad-Spectrum Protection Against Postharvest Pathogens

    W. S. Conway;C. E. Sams;J. A. Abbott;B. D. Bruton

  • Possible mechanisms by which postharvest calcium treatment reduces decay in apples.

    W. S. Conway;C. E. Sams

  • Biological control of postharvest decays of apple can prevent growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in apple wounds.

    W. J. Janisiewicz;W. S. Conway;B. Leverentz

  • Control of bitter rot and blue mold of apples by integrating heat and antagonist treatments on 1-MCP treated fruit stored under controlled atmosphere conditions

    Wojciech J Janisiewicz;Britta Leverentz;William S Conway;Robert A Saftner

  • Control of blue mold decay of apple during commercial controlled atmosphere storage with yeast antagonists and sodium bicarbonate

    Wojciech J. Janisiewicz;Robert A. Saftner;William S. Conway;Keith S. Yoder

  • Improving biocontrol using antagonist mixtures with heat and/or sodium bicarbonate to control postharvest decay of apple fruit

    William S. Conway;Britta Leverentz;Wojciech J. Janisiewicz;Robert A. Saftner

  • Combining yeasts or a bacterial biocontrol agent and heat treatment to reduce postharvest decay of ‘Gala’ apples

    Britta Leverentz;Wojciech J Janisiewicz;William S Conway;Robert A Saftner

  • Effect of combining MCP treatment, heat treatment, and biocontrol on the reduction of postharvest decay of ‘Golden Delicious’ apples

    Britta Leverentz;William S Conway;Wojciech J Janisiewicz;Robert A Saftner

  • Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the presence of indigenous microorganisms on commercially packaged baby spinach, as impacted by storage temperature and time.

    Yaguang Luo;Qiang He;Qiang He;James L. McEVOY;William S. Conway

  • Control of blue mold of apple by combining controlled atmosphere, an antagonist mixture, and sodium bicarbonate

    William S. Conway;Wojciech J. Janisiewicz;Britta Leverentz;Robert A. Saftner

  • Phospholipid, galactolipid, and steryl lipid composition of apple fruit cortical tissue following postharvest CaCl2 infiltration

    G.A. Picchioni;A.E. Watada;W.S. Conway;B.D. Whitaker

  • Postharvest calcium chloride infiltration affects textural attributes of apples

    J.A. Abbott;W.S. Conway;C.E. Sams

Frequent Co-Authors

Wojciech J. Janisiewicz
Wojciech J. Janisiewicz United States Department of Agriculture
Carl E. Sams
Carl E. Sams University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Robert A. Saftner
Robert A. Saftner United States Department of Agriculture
Alley E. Watada
Alley E. Watada United States Department of Agriculture
Yaguang Luo
Yaguang Luo United States Department of Agriculture
Bruce D. Whitaker
Bruce D. Whitaker United States Department of Agriculture
Hao Feng
Hao Feng University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Yoram Fuchs
Yoram Fuchs Agricultural Research Organization
Dov Prusky
Dov Prusky Agricultural Research Organization
Pina M. Fratamico
Pina M. Fratamico United States Department of Agriculture

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing William S. Conway