World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Vincent L. St. Louis

Vincent L. St. Louis

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
11089
World Ranking
3851
National Ranking
159

Vincent L. St. Louis publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent L. St. Louis sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 121 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Vincent L. St. Louis D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent L. St. Louis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Vincent L. St. Louis is a researcher affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada, specializing in environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. Their work primarily addresses topics related to climate change and permafrost, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, cryospheric studies and observations, mercury impact and mitigation studies, marine animal studies overview, toxic organic pollutants impact, and methane hydrates and related phenomena.

The scientist's recent publications indicate sustained contributions to understanding ecosystem carbon fluxes, mercury contamination recovery, and Arctic-boreal carbon dynamics. Notable papers include:

  • "Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties" (2021), published in Global Change Biology
  • "Experimental evidence for recovery of mercury-contaminated fish populations" (2021), published in Nature
  • "The ABCflux database: Arctic-boreal CO2 flux observations and ancillary information aggregated to monthly time steps across terrestrial ecosystems" (2022), published in Earth system science data
  • "Decadal increases in carbon uptake offset by respiratory losses across northern permafrost ecosystems" (2024), published in Nature Climate Change
  • "Warming Climate Is Reducing the Diversity of Dominant Microbes in the Largest High Arctic Lake" (2020), published in Frontiers in Microbiology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Vincent L. St. Louis include Craig A. Emmerton, Oliver Sonnentag, Brendan M. Rogers, Jennifer D. Watts, and Donatella Zona.

The scientist has published extensively in the following venues:

  • Nature Climate Change
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Global Change Biology
  • Nature
  • Earth system science data

Their fields of study focus primarily on environmental science with 31 publications and earth and planetary sciences with 22 publications. Subfields represented in their work include atmospheric science, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, global and planetary change, ecology, and environmental chemistry.

Best Publications

  • Reservoir Surfaces as Sources of Greenhouse Gases to the Atmosphere: A Global Estimate

    Vincent L. St. Louis;Carol A. Kelly;Éric Duchemin;John W. M. Rudd

  • Importance of Wetlands as Sources of Methyl Mercury to Boreal Forest Ecosystems

    Vincent L. St. Louis;John W. M. Rudd;Carol A. Kelly;Ken G. Beaty

  • Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition

    Reed C. Harris;John W. M. Rudd;Marc Amyot;Christopher L. Babiarz

  • Production and Loss of Methylmercury and Loss of Total Mercury from Boreal Forest Catchments Containing Different Types of Wetlands

    Vincent L. St. Louis;John W. M. Rudd;Carol A. Kelly;Ken G. Beaty

  • Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic emissions

    Yanxu Zhang;Daniel James Jacob;Hannah Marie Horowitz;Long Chen;Long Chen

  • Reactivity and Mobility of New and Old Mercury Deposition in a Boreal Forest Ecosystem during the First Year of the METAALICUS Study

    Holger Hintelmann;Reed Harris;Andrew Heyes;James P. Hurley

  • Methylation of inorganic mercury in polar marine waters

    Igor Lehnherr;Vincent L. St. Louis;Holger Hintelmann;Jane L. Kirk;Jane L. Kirk

  • Importance of the forest canopy to fluxes of methyl mercury and total mercury to boreal ecosystems.

    Vincent L. St. Louis;John W. M. Rudd;Carol A. Kelly;Britt D. Hall

  • The rise and fall of mercury methylation in an experimental reservoir.

    Vincent L. St.Louis;John W. M. Rudd;Carol A. Kelly;R. A. (Drew) Bodaly

  • Forest fire increases mercury accumulation by fishes via food web restructuring and increased mercury inputs

    Erin N. Kelly;David W. Schindler;Vincent L. St. Louis;David B. Donald

  • Microbial consumption of nitric and sulfuric acids in acidified north temperate lakes1

    John W. M. Rudd;C. A. Kelly;Vincent St. Louis;R. H. Hesslein

  • Long-Term Wet and Dry Deposition of Total and Methyl Mercury in the Remote Boreal Ecoregion of Canada

    Jennifer A Graydon;Vincent L St Louis;Holger Hintelmann;Steve E Lindberg

  • Mercury in Arctic Marine Ecosystems: Sources, Pathways, and Exposure

    Jane L. Kirk;Igor Lehnherr;Maria Andersson;Birgit M. Braune

  • Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties

    Anna Maria Virkkala;Juha Aalto;Juha Aalto;Brendan M. Rogers;Torbern Tagesson;Torbern Tagesson

  • Importance of Ultraviolet Radiation in the Photodemethylation of Methylmercury in Freshwater Ecosystems

    Igor Lehnherr;Vincent L St Louis

  • Comparison of three techniques used to measure diffusive gas exchange from sheltered aquatic surfaces.

    Cory J. D. Matthews;Vincent L. St.Louis;Raymond H. Hesslein

  • Impacts of Reservoir Creation on the Biogeochemical Cycling of Methyl Mercury and Total Mercury in Boreal Upland Forests

    B.D. Hall;B.D. Hall;V.L. St. Louis;K.R. Rolfhus;R.A. Bodaly

  • Is Total Mercury Concentration a Good Predictor of Methyl Mercury Concentration in Aquatic Systems

    Carol A. Kelly;John W. M. Rudd;Vincent L. St.Louis;Andrew Heyes

  • Rapid reduction and reemission of mercury deposited into snowpacks during atmospheric mercury depletion events at churchill, Manitoba, Canada.

    Jane L Kirk;Vincent L St Louis;Martin J Sharp

  • A mass budget for mercury and methylmercury in the Arctic Ocean

    Anne L. Soerensen;Anne L. Soerensen;Daniel J. Jacob;Amina T. Schartup;Jenny A. Fisher

  • Some Sources and Sinks of Monomethyl and Inorganic Mercury on Ellesmere Island in the Canadian High Arctic

    Vincent L. St. Louis;Martin J. Sharp;Alexandra Steffen;Al May

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol A. Kelly
Carol A. Kelly University of Manitoba
John W. M. Rudd
John W. M. Rudd University of Alberta
Holger Hintelmann
Holger Hintelmann Trent University
Sherry L. Schiff
Sherry L. Schiff University of Waterloo
Alexandre J. Poulain
Alexandre J. Poulain University of Ottawa
Steve E. Lindberg
Steve E. Lindberg Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Michael J. Paterson
Michael J. Paterson International Institute for Sustainable Development
David P. Krabbenhoft
David P. Krabbenhoft United States Geological Survey
Derek C. G. Muir
Derek C. G. Muir Environment and Climate Change Canada
Alexandra Steffen
Alexandra Steffen Environment and Climate Change Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many find that starting with some of the easy bachelor's degree options in environmental studies or related fields helps balance workload while gaining essential knowledge.

Specializations such as geoscience and geology are closely connected to environmental careers. Pursuing a geoscience online degree can provide a strong foundation in earth sciences and environmental systems, preparing students for roles in research, conservation, and resource management.

Another promising area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), a critical tool for environmental analysis and management. Students interested in spatial data and mapping should consider programs from the best GIS schools, which offer targeted training for careers in environmental consulting, urban planning, and disaster management.

For those looking to transition into leadership or policy roles within the environmental sector, a best online MPA (Master of Public Administration) program offers rapid, flexible training. This degree supports career development in environmental policy, nonprofit management, and government agencies focused on sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Vincent L. St. Louis

Trending Scientists