World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
12385
World Ranking
3108
National Ranking
1207

Steve E. Lindberg publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve E. Lindberg sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Steve E. Lindberg D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve E. Lindberg sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steve E. Lindberg is affiliated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States. Their research focuses on Environmental Science and Medicine, with key subfields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Surgery, and Ecology.

Lindberg has contributed to studies across several main topics, including:

  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Their recent publications demonstrate an interdisciplinary approach, with papers addressing both environmental and medical aspects. Notable works include:

  • "Experimental evidence for recovery of mercury-contaminated fish populations," 2021, published in Nature
  • "Development of an Understanding of Reactive Mercury in Ambient Air: A Review," 2021, published in Atmosphere
  • "Impacts of the Post-Transplant Graft Survival Performance Metric on Trends in One-Year Post-Transplant All-Cause Graft Failure Rates," 2025, published in American Journal of Transplantation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lindberg include:

  • Paul J. Blanchfield
  • John W. M. Rudd
  • Lee E. Hrenchuk
  • Marc Amyot
  • Christopher L. Babiarz

Steve E. Lindberg's research has been published in a range of venues, reflecting the diversity of their work. These venues include:

  • Nature
  • Atmosphere
  • American Journal of Transplantation

Best Publications

  • A Synthesis of Progress and Uncertainties in Attributing the Sources of Mercury in Deposition

    Steve Lindberg;Russell Bullock;Ralf Ebinghaus;Daniel Engstrom

  • Dynamic oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic troposphere at polar sunrise.

    Steve E. Lindberg;Steve Brooks;C.-J. Lin;Karen J. Scott

  • Atmospheric Mercury Speciation: Concentrations and Behavior of Reactive Gaseous Mercury in Ambient Air

    S. E. Lindberg;W. J. Stratton

  • Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition

    Reed C. Harris;John W. M. Rudd;Marc Amyot;Christopher L. Babiarz

  • Accumulation of atmospheric mercury in forest foliage

    J.A. Ericksen;M.S. Gustin;D.E. Schorran;D.W. Johnson

  • Reactivity and Mobility of New and Old Mercury Deposition in a Boreal Forest Ecosystem during the First Year of the METAALICUS Study

    Holger Hintelmann;Reed Harris;Andrew Heyes;James P. Hurley

  • Importance of the forest canopy to fluxes of methyl mercury and total mercury to boreal ecosystems.

    Vincent L. St. Louis;John W. M. Rudd;Carol A. Kelly;Britt D. Hall

  • Mercury Distribution Across 14 U.S. Forests. Part I: Spatial Patterns of Concentrations in Biomass, Litter, and Soils

    D. Obrist;D. W. Johnson;S. E. Lindberg;Y. Luo

  • Air/surface exchange of mercury vapor over forests-the need for a reassessment of continental biogenic emissions

    S.E. Lindberg;P.J. Hanson;T.P. Meyers;K.-H. Kim

  • Mechanisms of mercury removal by O3 and OH in the atmosphere

    Jack G. Calvert;Steve E. Lindberg

  • Scientific uncertainties in atmospheric mercury models I: Model science evaluation

    Che-Jen Lin;Pruek Pongprueksa;Steve E. Lindberg;Steve E. Lindberg;Simo O. Pehkonen

  • Nevada STORMS project: Measurement of mercury emissions from naturally enriched surfaces

    M. Sexauer Gustin;S. Lindberg;F. Marsik;A. Casimir

  • Atmospheric Emission and Plant Uptake of Mercury from Agricultural Soils near the Almadén Mercury Mine

    Unknown

  • Intercomparison of methods for sampling and analysis of atmospheric mercury species

    J Munthe;I Wängberg;N Pirrone;Å Iverfeldt

  • MERCURY AIR/SURFACE EXCHANGE KINETICS OF BACKGROUND SOILS OF THE TAHQUAMENON RIVER WATERSHED IN THE MICHIGAN UPPER PENINSULA ?

    H. Zhang;H. Zhang;S. E. Lindberg;F. J. Marsik;Gerald J. Keeler

  • Sources of sulphur in forest canopy throughfall

    Steven Eric Lindberg;Charles T Garten Jr

  • Long-Term Wet and Dry Deposition of Total and Methyl Mercury in the Remote Boreal Ecoregion of Canada

    Jennifer A Graydon;Vincent L St Louis;Holger Hintelmann;Steve E Lindberg

  • Sunlight and Iron(III)-Induced Photochemical Production of Dissolved Gaseous Mercury in Freshwater

    Unknown

  • Increases in mercury emissions from desert soils in response to rainfall and irrigation

    S. E. Lindberg;H. Zhang;M. Gustin;A. Vette

  • Methylated mercury species in municipal waste landfill gas sampled in Florida, USA

    S.E Lindberg;D Wallschläger;E.M Prestbo;N.S Bloom

  • Transpiration of gaseous elemental mercury through vegetation in a subtropical wetland in Florida.

    Steven Eric Lindberg;Weijin Dong;Weijin Dong;Tilden Meyers

  • Assessing the contribution of natural sources to regional atmospheric mercury budgets

    M. S. Gustin;S. E. Lindberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Mae Sexauer Gustin
Mae Sexauer Gustin University of Nevada Reno
Carol A. Kelly
Carol A. Kelly University of Manitoba
Holger Hintelmann
Holger Hintelmann Trent University
Vincent L. St. Louis
Vincent L. St. Louis University of Alberta
Che-Jen Lin
Che-Jen Lin Lamar University
Tilden P. Meyers
Tilden P. Meyers National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ralf Ebinghaus
Ralf Ebinghaus Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
John W. M. Rudd
John W. M. Rudd University of Alberta
David P. Krabbenhoft
David P. Krabbenhoft United States Geological Survey
Marc Amyot
Marc Amyot University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. For those interested in governance and sustainable policy-making, pursuing a 1 year mpa online can provide essential skills in public administration and environmental law, helping professionals influence meaningful change.

Complementing scientific knowledge with social insights is equally valuable. A best online sociology bachelor degree equips students to analyze the societal impacts of environmental issues, fostering holistic solutions that consider human communities alongside ecosystems.

For advanced practitioners aiming to lead research or academic efforts without extensive traditional requirements, exploring a doctorate degree online no dissertation can be an appealing alternative, allowing professionals to deepen their expertise flexibly.

Additionally, educators looking to specialize can take advantage of online eds to edd programs, designed to advance teaching skills while focusing on environmental education leadership. These diverse degree options highlight the expansive career pathways stemming from environmental science studies.

Best Scientists Citing Steve E. Lindberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles