World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
40877
World Ranking
15367
National Ranking
7749

Sid Gilman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sid Gilman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 367 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Sid Gilman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sid Gilman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1995 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Sid Gilman is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neurology, with additional work contributing to historical perspectives within medical studies.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Medicine

Within these fields, subfields of study have focused on:

  • Neurology
  • History

The primary topics covered in their research work are:

  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • History of Medical Practice
  • Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Medical History and Innovations

Sid Gilman has published in various scientific venues, with frequent publication in:

  • Movement Disorders
  • Neurology

Recent papers authored include:

  • "Serotonin Transporter Imaging in Multiple System Atrophy and Parkinson's Disease," 2022, published in Movement Disorders
  • "Derek Denny-Brown: His Life in New Zealand and England 1901-1941 (P4-3.008)," 2023, published in Neurology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Sid Gilman are:

  • Kelvin L. Chou
  • Praveen Dayalu
  • Robert A. Koeppe
  • C. Chauncey Spears
  • Roger L. Albin

Over the course of their career, Sid Gilman has received several professional recognitions including:

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2001
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1998
  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), 1995

Best Publications

  • Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson Disease

    Douglas J. Gelb;Eugene Oliver;Sid Gilman

  • Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy

    S. Gilman;G. K. Wenning;P. A. Low;D. J. Brooks

  • Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy

    S Gilman;P.A Low;N Quinn;A Albanese

  • Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

    Adam C. Naj;Gyungah Jun;Gary W. Beecham;Li-San Wang

  • Subacute meningoencephalitis in a subset of patients with AD after Abeta42 immunization.

    J.-M. Orgogozo;S. Gilman;J.-F. Dartigues;B. Laurent

  • Clinical effects of Abeta immunization (AN1792) in patients with AD in an interrupted trial.

    S. Gilman;M. Koller;R. S. Black;L. Jenkins

  • A phase 2 multiple ascending dose trial of bapineuzumab in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease.

    S. Salloway;R. Sperling;S. Gilman;N.C.I. Fox

  • The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database: the Uniform Data Set.

    Duane L. Beekly;Erin M. Ramos;William W. Lee;Woodrow D. Deitrich

  • Consensus report of the working group on: 'Molecular and biochemical markers of Alzheimer's disease'

    Peter Davies;Judith Resnick;Burton Resnick;Sid Gilman

  • Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17: A consensus conference

    Norman L. Foster;Kirk C. Wilhelmsen;Anders A. F. Sima;Anders A. F. Sima;Margaret Z. Jones

  • Development and validation of the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS).

    Gregor K. Wenning;Franc̨ois Tison;Klaus Seppi;Cristina Sampaio

  • Common variants at 7p21 are associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 inclusions

    Vivianna M. Van Deerlin;Patrick M A Sleiman;Maria Martinez-Lage;Maria Martinez-Lage;Alice Chen-Plotkin

  • Effects of Abeta immunization (AN1792) on MRI measures of cerebral volume in Alzheimer disease.

    N. C. Fox;R. S. Black;S. Gilman;M. N. Rossor

  • Mutations in COQ2 in familial and sporadic multiple-system atrophy the multiple-system atrophy research collaboration

    Jun Mitsui;Takashi Matsukawa;Hiroyuki Ishiura;Yoko Fukuda;Yoko Fukuda

  • Common genetic variants in the CLDN2 and PRSS1-PRSS2 loci alter risk for alcohol-related and sporadic pancreatitis

    David C. Whitcomb;Jessica LaRusch;Alyssa M. Krasinskas;Lambertus Klei

  • CEREBRAL DISORDERS AFTER OPEN-HEART OPERATIONS.

    Sid Gilman

  • Disorders of the cerebellum

    Sid Gilman;James R. Bloedel;Richard Lechtenberg

  • Presynaptic monoaminergic vesicles in Parkinson's disease and normal aging

    Kirk A. Frey;Robert A. Koeppe;Michael R. Kilbourn;Thierry M. Vander Borght

  • Widespread Alterations of α-Synuclein in Multiple System Atrophy

    D.W. Dickson;W.-K. Liu;J. Hardy;M. Farrer

  • Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy

    G. K. Wenning;S. Gilman;K. Seppi

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Koeppe
Robert A. Koeppe University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Larry Junck
Larry Junck University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kirk A. Frey
Kirk A. Frey University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Roger L. Albin
Roger L. Albin University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Roderick J. A. Little
Roderick J. A. Little University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John Q. Trojanowski
John Q. Trojanowski University of Pennsylvania
Phillip A. Low
Phillip A. Low Mayo Clinic
Norman L. Foster
Norman L. Foster University of Utah
Stanley Berent
Stanley Berent University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bruno Giordani
Bruno Giordani University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare but seeking alternative routes or advanced credentials, online degree programs offer flexible and affordable options. Prospective nurses can benefit from accelerated lpn pathways, helping students quickly gain qualifications and enter the workforce. If specialization is your goal, the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs make it possible for experienced nurses to train as psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners efficiently.

Cost is an important factor for many students. The cheapest online dnp programs provide a path for nurses to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice without excessive debt, while those interested in healthcare management can explore a health care administration online degree to move into leadership roles.

Whether you're aiming for bedside nursing, advanced practice, or healthcare leadership, these online degrees create new opportunities and help meet growing industry demand.

Best Scientists Citing Sid Gilman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles