World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 44 1350 1263 570 520 111 8935

Sheryl E. Kimes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sheryl E. Kimes between 1989 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sheryl E. Kimes published across 35 years, from 1989 to 2023, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2011. 1 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2011. 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 7 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 5 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1989 2023

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sheryl E. Kimes: publications per year, 1989 to 2023
Year Publications
1989 3
1990 1
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 6
2000 1
2001 6
2002 6
2003 8
2004 4
2005 5
2006 2
2007 7
2008 3
2009 10
2010 6
2011 15
2012 4
2013 4
2014 2
2015 1
2016 7
2017 0
2018 1
2019 5
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
Total 116
Download as CSV

Sheryl E. Kimes publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sheryl E. Kimes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 110–114 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 111 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96 111
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Sheryl E. Kimes D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sheryl E. Kimes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68 44
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Sheryl E. Kimes is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broader category of social sciences, with a specific focus on the subfield of transportation. This specialization informs much of their scholarly output and research interests.

The main topics covered in Kimes's work include cruise tourism development and management. This focus on cruise tourism indicates an interest in the operational and strategic aspects of managing cruise travel and its related industries.

Their frequent co-authors include Jochen Wirtz, with whom they have collaborated on multiple occasions, Rohit Verma, and Christopher W. L. Hart. These collaborations suggest engagement with researchers who share interests in service management and related fields.

Notable aspects of Kimes's scholarly profile are:

  • Collaborations with Jochen Wirtz (2 joint publications)
  • Collaboration with Rohit Verma (1 joint publication)
  • Collaboration with Christopher W. L. Hart (1 joint publication)

In terms of their research dissemination, Kimes has not been associated with specific recurring publication venues or recent individual papers publicly documented in the available data. Similarly, there is no data on books published by Kimes or awards received.

Best Publications

  • Yield management: A tool for capacity-considered service firms

    Sheryl E. Kimes

  • The Basics of Yield Management

    Sheryl E. Kimes

  • Perceived Fairness of Demand-based Pricing for Restaurants

    Sheryl E. Kimes;Jochen Wirtz

  • Has Revenue Management become Acceptable?: Findings from an International Study on the Perceived Fairness of Rate Fences

    Sheryl E. Kimes;Jochen Wirtz

  • A Comparison of Forecasting Methods for Hotel Revenue Management

    Larry R. Weatherford;Sheryl E. Kimes

  • Perceived Fairness of Yield Management

    Sheryl E. Kimes

  • Restaurant Revenue Management: Applying Yield Management to the Restaurant Industry

    Sheryl E. Kimes;Richard B. Chase;Summee Choi;Philip Y Lee

  • Only If It Is Convenient Understanding How Convenience Influences Self-Service Technology Evaluation

    Joel E. Collier;Sheryl E. Kimes

  • The Moderating Role of Familiarity in Fairness Perceptions of Revenue Management Pricing

    Jochen Wirtz;Sheryl E. Kimes

  • The Strategic Levers of Yield Management

    Sheryl E. Kimes;Richard B. Chase

  • Revenue management: resolving potential customer conflicts

    Jochen Wirtz;Sheryl E Kimes;Jeannette Ho Pheng Theng;Paul Patterson

  • Integrating customer relationship management and revenue management: A hotel perspective

    Breffni M Noone;Sheryl E Kimes;Leo M Renaghan

  • Electronic distribution channels' effect on hotel revenue management☆

    Sunmee Choi;Sheryl E. Kimes

  • The Future of Hotel Revenue Management

    Sheryl E Kimes

  • Revenue management: A retrospective

    Sheryl E. Kimes

  • Restaurant Revenue Management at Chevys: Determining the Best Table Mix

    Sheryl E. Kimes;Gary M. Thompson

  • Implementing restaurant revenue management: A Five-step approach

    Sheryl E. Kimes

  • The Role of Technology in Restaurant Revenue Management

    Sheryl E. Kimes

  • Forecasting for Hotel Revenue Management: Testing Aggregation Against Disaggregation

    Lawrence R Weatherford;Sheryl E Kimes;Darren A Scott

  • The Impact of Restaurant Table Characteristics on Meal Duration and Spending

    Sheryl E. Kimes;Stephani K. A. Robson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jochen Wirtz
Jochen Wirtz National University of Singapore
Rohit Verma
Rohit Verma University of South Carolina
Utpal M. Dholakia
Utpal M. Dholakia Rice University
Thompson S. H. Teo
Thompson S. H. Teo National University of Singapore
Cathy A. Enz
Cathy A. Enz Cornell University
Judy A. Siguaw
Judy A. Siguaw East Carolina University
Anna S. Mattila
Anna S. Mattila Pennsylvania State University
Richard B. Chase
Richard B. Chase University of Southern California
Lee W. Schruben
Lee W. Schruben University of California, Berkeley
Gary W. Evans
Gary W. Evans Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right academic pathway in Business and Management can open doors to diverse careers, whether you’re interested in leadership, entrepreneurship, or the business side of healthcare. Many students look for flexible options. For those who want to graduate quickly and enter the workforce sooner, there are colleges with accelerated programs that offer condensed curriculums without sacrificing quality.

Online learning continues to expand, making degrees more accessible and budget-friendly. Prospective business professionals can explore online business degrees that allow for coursework at your own pace and often at a lower cost than traditional on-campus programs.

Interested in a career intersecting business and healthcare? Students can benefit from the cheapest online healthcare administration degree options, offering a pathway into one of the fastest-growing sectors. For advanced roles, earning a master’s with a healthcare administration degree can increase earning potential and leadership opportunities in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

Whether you pursue business or healthcare management, these flexible and affordable online programs can help shape a successful and dynamic career.

Best Scientists Citing Sheryl E. Kimes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles