World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 31 2778 2627 453 416 110 5598

Irene C. L. Ng publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Irene C. L. Ng between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Irene C. L. Ng published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2012. 2 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2012. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1999 2025

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Irene C. L. Ng: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 2
2007 8
2008 6
2009 13
2010 9
2011 11
2012 19
2013 7
2014 8
2015 5
2016 2
2017 5
2018 10
2019 0
2020 2
2021 2
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
2025 1
Total 114
Download as CSV

Irene C. L. Ng publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irene C. L. Ng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 110–114 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 110 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96 110
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Irene C. L. Ng D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irene C. L. Ng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159 31
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Irene C. L. Ng is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the field of Business, Management and Accounting. Their work spans several subfields including Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation, Marketing, and Mechanical Engineering.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics at the intersection of technology, innovation, and business models. Select papers by Irene C. L. Ng include:

  • The Internet of Everything: Smart things and their impact on business models (2020, Journal of Business Research)
  • How additive manufacturing allows products to absorb variety in use: empirical evidence from the defence industry (2020, Production Planning & Control)
  • Boundary negotiations: a paradox theoretical approach for efficient and flexible modular systems (2021, International Journal of Operations & Production Management)
  • Designing Digital Platforms for Social Justice: Empowering End Users Through the Dataswyft Platform (2024, MIS Quarterly)
  • Privacy markets in the Apps and IoT age (2021, Helda (University of Helsinki))

Their research topics consistently address the application of blockchain technology, product development and customization, service and product innovation, information systems theories, design education and practice, quality and supply management, and innovation and knowledge management.

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Product Development and Customization
  • Service and Product Innovation
  • Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Design Education and Practice
  • Quality and Supply Management
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management

Ng frequently collaborates with several scholars, including Philip Davies, Glenn Parry, David Langley, Jenny van Doorn, and Stefan Stieglitz. These collaborations indicate engagement across multiple perspectives and disciplines within their research community.

  • Philip Davies
  • Glenn Parry
  • David Langley
  • Jenny van Doorn
  • Stefan Stieglitz

Their work has been published in prominent academic venues such as:

  • Journal of Business Research
  • Production Planning & Control
  • International Journal of Operations & Production Management
  • MIS Quarterly
  • Helda (University of Helsinki)

Best Publications

  • The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions

    Irene C.L. Ng;Susan Y.L. Wakenshaw

  • Education as Service: The Understanding of University Experience Through the Service Logic

    Irene C. L. Ng;Jeannie Forbes

  • Outcome-based contracts as a driver for systems thinking and service-dominant logic in service science: evidence from the defence industry

    Irene C. L. Ng;Roger Maull;Nick K. T. Yip

  • Servitization and operations management: a service dominant-logic approach

    Laura A. Smith;Roger Maull;Irene C. L. Ng

  • The Internet of Everything: Smart things and their impact on business models

    David J. Langley;David J. Langley;Jenny van Doorn;Irene C.L. Ng;Stefan Stieglitz

  • Outcome‐based service contracts in the defence industry – mitigating the challenges

    Irene C.L. Ng;Sai S. Nudurupati

  • Outcome-based contracts as new business model : the role of partnership and value-driven relational assets

    Irene C.L. Ng;David Xin Ding;Nick Yip

  • Transitioning from a goods‐dominant to a service‐dominant logic: Visualising the value proposition of Rolls‐Royce

    Irene C. L. Ng;Glenn Parry;Laura A. Smith;Roger Maull

  • Viable service systems and decision making in service management

    Ralph D. Badinelli;Sergio Barile;Irene C. L. Ng;Francesco Polese

  • An integrative framework of value

    Irene C.L. Ng;Laura A. Smith

  • Contextual variety, Internet-of-Things and the choice of tailoring over platform: Mass customisation strategy in supply chain management $

    Irene C. L. Ng;Kimberley A. Scharf;Ganna Pogrebna;Roger Maull

  • The Pricing and Revenue Management of Services: A strategic approach

    Irene C.L. Ng

  • Operationalising IoT for reverse supply: the development of use-visibility measures

    Glenn C Parry;Saara A. Brax;Roger S. Maull;Irene C. L. Ng

  • Two strands of servitization: a thematic analysis of traditional and customer co-created servitization and future research directions

    Maxwell H. Green;Philip Davies;Irene C.L. Ng

  • The strategic role of unused service capacity

    Irene C.L. Ng;Jochen Wirtz;Khai Sheang Lee

  • Embedding the New Discipline of Service Science

    Irene C. L. Ng;Roger Maull;Laura A. Smith

  • Value co-creation in the delivery of outcome-based contracts for business-to-business service

    Irene C. L. Ng;Sai S. Nudurupati;Paul Tasker

  • Servitization through outcome-based contract – A systems perspective from the defence industry

    Luciano Batista;Simon Davis-Poynter;Irene C. L. Ng;Roger Maull

  • Learning to be Sociable The Evolution of Homo Economicus

    Irene C. L. Ng;Lu-Ming Tseng

  • ADVANCED SALE OF SERVICE CAPACITIES: A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF PRICE SENSITIVITY ON PRICING AND CAPACITY ALLOCATIONS

    Khai Sheang Lee;Irene C.L Ng

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger Maull
Roger Maull University of Exeter
Glenn Parry
Glenn Parry University of Surrey
Jon Crowcroft
Jon Crowcroft University of Cambridge
Duncan McFarlane
Duncan McFarlane University of Cambridge
Stephen L. Vargo
Stephen L. Vargo University of Oklahoma
Jochen Wirtz
Jochen Wirtz National University of Singapore
Richard Mortier
Richard Mortier University of Cambridge
Rajkumar Roy
Rajkumar Roy City, University of London
Andy Crabtree
Andy Crabtree University of Nottingham
Charith Perera
Charith Perera Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Business and Management studies in the USA open doors to a wide variety of online degree programs that can diversify your career prospects. For those interested in the booming healthcare sector, pursuing healthcare administration degrees online equips you with the skills to manage hospitals, clinics, and health organizations, with flexibility and at lower costs.

If you wish to advance further in health sector leadership, an affordable master's program for administration healthcare can help you move up to executive roles. These master's degrees are designed for working professionals seeking to balance their studies with existing commitments.

Alternatively, the demand for financial oversight has made online accounting classes a valuable addition for business students aiming to pursue careers in finance, auditing, or entrepreneurship. These programs let you study at your own pace and gain industry-relevant credentials.

Looking ahead, technology-driven roles are expanding rapidly. Pursuing online ai degrees provides a foundation in machine learning and intelligent systems, allowing you to lead innovation in almost any industry.

Best Scientists Citing Irene C. L. Ng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles