World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
64
Citations
11953
World Ranking
2380
National Ranking
182

Roderic L. Jones publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderic L. Jones sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 243 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Roderic L. Jones D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roderic L. Jones sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roderic L. Jones is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and focuses primarily on environmental science. Their research spans several subfields including health, toxicology and mutagenesis, environmental engineering, atmospheric science, global and planetary change, and speech and hearing.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to air quality and health impacts, air quality monitoring and forecasting, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, noise effects and management, climate change and health impacts, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, and vehicle emissions and performance.

Roderic L. Jones has published in a variety of scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques

Their recent published papers include:

  • Evaluating the sensitivity of radical chemistry and ozone formation to ambient VOCs and NO x in Beijing, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Source-Receptor Relationship Revealed by the Halted Traffic and Aggravated Haze in Beijing during the COVID-19 Lockdown, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Predictive and retrospective modelling of airborne infection risk using monitored carbon dioxide, 2021, Indoor and Built Environment
  • Key Role of NO3 Radicals in the Production of Isoprene Nitrates and Nitrooxyorganosulfates in Beijing, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Personal exposure to air pollution and respiratory health of COPD patients in London, 2021, European Respiratory Journal

Collaboration has been a significant element of their work. Frequent co-authors include Lia Chatzidiakou, Benjamin Barratt, Olalekan Popoola, Frank J. Kelly, and Tong Zhu.

Best Publications

  • The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks

    M.I. Mead;O.A.M. Popoola;G.B. Stewart;P. Landshoff

  • Dehydration in the lower Antarctic stratosphere during late winter and early spring, 1987

    K. K. Kelly;A. F. Tuck;D. M. Murphy;M. H. Proffitt

  • Analysis for BrO in zenith‐sky spectra: An intercomparison exercise for analysis improvement

    S. R. Aliwell;M. Van Roozendael;P. V. Johnston;A. Richter

  • Use of networks of low cost air quality sensors to quantify air quality in urban settings

    Olalekan A.M. Popoola;David Carruthers;Chetan Lad;Vivien B. Bright

  • Cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy of multiple trace gas species using a supercontinuum radiation source

    J. M. Langridge;T. Laurila;R. S. Watt;R. L. Jones

  • Broad-Band Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy

    Stephen M. Ball;Roderic L. Jones

  • Developing a Relative Humidity Correction for Low-Cost Sensors Measuring Ambient Particulate Matter.

    Andrea Di Antonio;Olalekan Abdul Popoola;Bin Ouyang;John Saffell

  • The water vapour budget of the stratosphere studied using LIMS and SAMS satellite data

    R. L. Jones;J. A. Pyle;J. E. Harries;A. M. Zavody

  • Broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy using light emitting diodes

    Stephen M. Ball;Justin M. Langridge;Roderic L. Jones

  • Source attribution of air pollution by spatial scale separation using high spatial density networks of low cost air quality sensors

    Ines Heimann;VB Bright;MW McLeod;MI Mead

  • Modelling molecular iodine emissions in a coastal marine environment: The link to new particle formation

    A. Saiz-Lopez;J. M. C. Plane;G. McFiggans;P. I. Williams

  • The potential for ozone depletion in the arctic polar stratosphere.

    W. H. Brune;J. G. Anderson;D. W. Toohey;D. W. Fahey

  • Dynamic neural network architectures for on field stochastic calibration of indicative low cost air quality sensing systems

    E. Esposito;S. De Vito;M. Salvato;V. Bright

  • Development of a baseline-temperature correction methodology for electrochemical sensors and its implications for long-term stability

    Olalekan Abdul Popoola;GB Stewart;Mohammed Iqbal Mead;Roderic Lewis Jones

  • NO3 radical production from the reaction between the Criegee intermediate CH2OO and NO2

    Bin Ouyang;Matthew W. McLeod;Roderic L. Jones;William J. Bloss

  • Relative influences of atmospheric chemistry and transport on Arctic ozone trends

    M. P. Chipperfield;R. L. Jones

  • Evaluating the sensitivity of radical chemistry and ozone formation to ambient VOCs and NO x in Beijing

    Lisa K. Whalley;Eloise J. Slater;Robert Woodward-Massey;Robert Woodward-Massey;Chunxiang Ye;Chunxiang Ye

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics in the atmosphere of a developed megacity (London): an overview of the REPARTEE experiment and its conclusions

    R. M. Harrison;R. M. Harrison;M. Dall'Osto;M. Dall'Osto;D. C. S. Beddows;A. J. Thorpe;A. J. Thorpe

  • Validating novel air pollution sensors to improve exposure estimates for epidemiological analyses and citizen science.

    Michael Jerrett;David Donaire-Gonzalez;Olalekan Popoola;Roderic Jones

  • Kinetics and Products of the IO Self-Reaction

    William J. Bloss;David M. Rowley;and R. Anthony Cox;Roderic L. Jones

  • Rotational Raman scattering and the ring effect in zenith‐sky spectra

    D. J. Fish;R. L. Jones

  • Iodine-mediated coastal particle formation: an overview of the Reactive Halogens in the Marine Boundary Layer (RHaMBLe) Roscoff coastal study

    Gordon Mcfiggans;C. S. E. Bale;S. M. Ball;J. M. Beames

  • Diagnostic studies of the Antartctic vortex during the 1987 Airborne Antarctic Ozone Experiment: Ozone miniholes

    D. S. McKenna;R. L. Jones;J. Austin;E. V. Browell

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Cox
Richard A. Cox University of Cambridge
Neil R. P. Harris
Neil R. P. Harris Cranfield University
John A. Pyle
John A. Pyle University of Cambridge
Frank J. Kelly
Frank J. Kelly Imperial College London
William J. Bloss
William J. Bloss University of Birmingham
James D. Lee
James D. Lee University of York
Hugh Coe
Hugh Coe University of Manchester
Daniel S. McKenna
Daniel S. McKenna Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Carl J. Percival
Carl J. Percival University of Manchester
Alastair C. Lewis
Alastair C. Lewis University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise in environmental sciences, pursuing online degrees offers flexibility and accessibility. Many students seek programs that align with their career goals while balancing other commitments.

Individuals aiming to advance as educators or administrators can explore eds to edd program options, which provide a pathway from a master's level education specialist degree to a doctorate in education. These programs often emphasize leadership and policy, valuable for environmental education roles.

For those interested in social aspects of environmental work, online dsw programs offer advanced knowledge to address community and social issues related to sustainability and environmental justice.

Students seeking cost-effective pathways can consider affordable options like the online general studies bachelor degree cheap. This degree allows for broad skill development, which can be tailored to environmental interests through electives.

Furthermore, those new to higher education or looking for less intensive starting points might find value in some of the easiest bachelor degree programs available online, enabling a smoother transition into environmental science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Roderic L. Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles