World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
45
Citations
10177
World Ranking
4212
National Ranking
1816

Philip J. Farabaugh publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Farabaugh sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 87 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Philip J. Farabaugh D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Farabaugh sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip J. Farabaugh is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore County in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with an emphasis on Molecular Biology as a subfield. Their work spans a range of topics related to RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, RNA modifications and cancer, molecular biology techniques, CRISPR and genetic engineering, peptidase inhibition and analysis, signaling pathways in disease, and natural language processing techniques.

Farabaugh has contributed to several recent scientific publications, including:

  • Guidelines for minimal reporting requirements, design and interpretation of experiments involving the use of eukaryotic dual gene expression reporters (MINDR), 2025, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
  • Posttranscriptional modification to the core of tRNAs modulates translational misreading errors, 2023, RNA
  • Translon: a single term for translated regions, 2025, Nature Methods
  • An evolutionarily conserved phosphoserine-arginine salt bridge in the interface between ribosomal proteins uS4 and uS5 regulates translational accuracy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 2024, Nucleic Acids Research
  • Novel Reporter System to Quantify Missense Errors During Translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 2025, Journal of Science Technology Education Art and Medicine

These publications have appeared in journals such as Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, RNA, Nature Methods, Nucleic Acids Research, and the Journal of Science Technology Education Art and Medicine. The scientist frequently collaborates with several peers, including Gary Loughran, Dmitry E. Andreev, Olivier Namy, Martin Mikl, and C. Joel McManus.

The main fields of study shaping Farabaugh's research are interconnected with their investigations into genetic translation accuracy, RNA biology, and molecular mechanisms underlying cellular processes. Their range of expertise also extends into cancer-related RNA modifications and advanced molecular biology techniques, providing a multidisciplinary approach to their scientific inquiries.

Best Publications

  • Molecular basis of base substitution hotspots in Escherichia coli.

    Christine Coulondre;Jeffrey H. Miller;Philip J. Farabaugh;Walter Gilbert

  • Programmed translational frameshifting.

    Farabaugh Pj

  • Genetic studies of the lac repressor: VII. On the molecular nature of spontaneous hotspots in the lacI gene of Escherichia coli

    Philip J. Farabaugh;Ursula Schmeissner;Murielle Hofer;Jeffrey H. Miller

  • Sequence of the lacI gene.

    Philip J. Farabaugh;Philip J. Farabaugh

  • The frequency of translational misreading errors in E. coli is largely determined by tRNA competition.

    Emily B. Kramer;Philip J. Farabaugh

  • Nucleotide sequence of a yeast Ty element: evidence for an unusual mechanism of gene expression

    Jeffrey Clare;Philip Farabaugh

  • Ribosomal frameshifting in the yeast retrotransposon Ty: tRNAs induce slippage on a 7 nucleotide minimal site

    Michael F. Belcourt;Philip J. Farabaugh

  • Insertion of the eukaryotic transposable element Ty1 creates a 5-base pair duplication.

    Philip J. Farabaugh;Gerald R. Fink

  • Oncogenic role of DDX3 in breast cancer biogenesis

    M Botlagunta;F Vesuna;Y Mironchik;A Raman

  • The nucleotide sequence of the HIS4 region of yeast.

    Thomas F. Donahue;Philip J. Farabaugh;Gerald R. Fink

  • The Origins of Gene Instability in Yeast

    GS Roeder;PJ Farabaugh;DT Chaleff;GR Fink

  • A novel programed frameshift expresses the POL3 gene of retrotransposon Ty3 of yeast: Frameshifting without tRNA slippage

    Philip J. Farabaugh;Hong Zhao;Arunachalam Vimaladithan

  • How translational accuracy influences reading frame maintenance.

    Philip J. Farabaugh;Glenn R. Björk

  • Protein mistranslation: friend or foe?

    Liuís Ribas de Pouplana;Manuel A.S. Santos;Jun-Hao Zhu;Philip J. Farabaugh

  • A rare tRNA-Arg(CCU) that regulates Ty1 element ribosomal frameshifting is essential for Ty1 retrotransposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    K Kawakami;S Pande;Brenda Faiola;DP Moore

  • A comprehensive analysis of translational missense errors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    Emily B. Kramer;Haritha Vallabhaneni;Lauren M. Mayer;Philip J. Farabaugh

  • Efficient translational frameshifting occurs within a conserved sequence of the overlap between the two genes of a yeast Ty1 transposon

    J J Clare;M Belcourt;P J Farabaugh

  • A New Model for Phenotypic Suppression of Frameshift Mutations by Mutant tRNAs

    Qiang Qian;Ji-nong Li;Hong Zhao;Tord G. Hagervall

  • Translational frameshifting: implications for the mechanism of translational frame maintenance.

    Philip J. farabaugh

  • New ways of initiating translation in eukaryotes? [2](multiple letters)

    R. Schneider;V. I. Agol;R. Andino;F. Bayard

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenn R. Björk
Glenn R. Björk Umeå University
David J. Garfinkel
David J. Garfinkel University of Georgia
David M. Bedwell
David M. Bedwell University of Alabama at Birmingham
Richard J. Maraia
Richard J. Maraia National Institutes of Health
Fred Winston
Fred Winston Harvard University
Susan W. Liebman
Susan W. Liebman University of Nevada Reno
Walter Gilbert
Walter Gilbert Harvard University
Jef D. Boeke
Jef D. Boeke New York University
Koichi Kawakami
Koichi Kawakami National Institute of Genetics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics opens doors to a wide range of healthcare careers beyond laboratory research. If you’re interested in branching into different fields, plenty of online study options are available that align well with a genetics background.

For those who prefer working in the administrative side of healthcare, consider an online healthcare administration degree. These programs offer flexibility and can be completed faster with accelerated options, helping you transition quickly into management roles. Additionally, you can explore healthcare administration programs that are budget-friendly and accessible.

If you’re interested in patient care, look into nursing schools with high acceptance rates to find attainable pathways into nursing—a field with ongoing demand for skilled professionals. Alternatively, administrative certifications such as a medical billing certification offer career paths in healthcare data management, billing, and coding.

No matter your interest, pairing genetics expertise with related online degrees or certifications can greatly expand your professional options in the US healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. Farabaugh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles