World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
7873
World Ranking
6399
National Ranking
2303

Scot C. R. Rafkin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scot C. R. Rafkin sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 274 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Scot C. R. Rafkin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scot C. R. Rafkin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scot C. R. Rafkin is affiliated with the Southwest Research Institute in the United States and focuses primarily on research within the fields of Physics and Astronomy. Their scientific contributions predominantly involve Astronomy and Astrophysics, with additional work intersecting with Molecular Biology, Physiology, Atmospheric Science, and Aerospace Engineering.

The main topics covered in their research include Astro and Planetary Science, Planetary Science and Exploration, Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies, Spaceflight Effects on Biology, Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics, Space Exploration and Technology, and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research.

Rafkin has published extensively, with a significant number of papers appearing in venues such as Harvard Dataverse, Icarus, The Planetary Science Journal, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Space Science Reviews.

  • Science Goals and Objectives for the Dragonfly Titan Rotorcraft Relocatable Lander, 2021, The Planetary Science Journal
  • The Mars Environmental Dynamics Analyzer, MEDA. A Suite of Environmental Sensors for the Mars 2020 Mission, 2021, Space Science Reviews
  • Radiation environment for future human exploration on the surface of Mars: the current understanding based on MSL/RAD dose measurements, 2021, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
  • Meteorological Predictions for Mars 2020 Perseverance Rover Landing Site at Jezero Crater, 2020, Space Science Reviews
  • The diverse meteorology of Jezero crater over the first 250 sols of Perseverance on Mars, 2023, Nature Geoscience

Collaboration is an important aspect of Rafkin's work. Frequent co-authors include Alejandro Soto, R. Hueso, Juan M. Lora, Jorge Pla-García, and Audrey Chatain.

  • Alejandro Soto
  • R. Hueso
  • Juan M. Lora
  • Jorge Pla-García
  • Audrey Chatain

Best Publications

  • Mars’ Surface Radiation Environment Measured with the Mars Science Laboratory’s Curiosity Rover

    Donald M. Hassler;Cary Zeitlin;Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber;Bent Ehresmann

  • Volatile and organic compositions of sedimentary rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater, Mars.

    Douglas W. Ming;P. D. Archer;D. P. Glavin;J. L. Eigenbrode

  • Background levels of methane in Mars' atmosphere show strong seasonal variations

    Christopher R. Webster;Paul R. Mahaffy;Sushil K. Atreya;John E. Moores

  • The Mars Regional Atmospheric Modeling System: Model Description and Selected Simulations

    Scot C.R. Rafkin;Robert M. Haberle;Timothy I. Michaels

  • Oxidant enhancement in Martian dust devils and storms: Implications for life and habitability

    Sushil K. Atreya;Ah San Wong;Nilton O. Renno;William M. Farrell

  • Large-eddy simulation of atmospheric convection on Mars

    Timothy I. Michaels;Scot C. R. Rafkin

  • Gusev crater: Wind‐related features and processes observed by the Mars Exploration Rover Spirit

    Ronald Greeley;R. E. Arvidson;P. W. Barlett;Diana Blaney

  • Science Goals and Objectives for the Dragonfly Titan Rotorcraft Relocatable Lander

    Jason Barnes;Elizabeth Turtle;Melissa Trainer;Ralph Lorenz

  • Curiosity's rover environmental monitoring station: Overview of the first 100 sols

    Javier Gõmez-Elvira;Carlos Armiens;Isaías Carrasco;Maria Genzer

  • Meteorological predictions for 2003 Mars Exploration Rover high‐priority landing sites

    Scot C. R. Rafkin;T. I. Michaels

  • Simulation of the atmospheric thermal circulation of a martian volcano using a mesoscale numerical model

    Scot C. R. Rafkin;Magdalena R. V. Sta. Maria;Timothy I. Michaels

  • Oxidant enhancement in martian dust devils and storms: storm electric fields and electron dissociative attachment

    Gregory T. Delory;William M. Farrell;Sushil K. Atreya;Nilton O. Renno

  • The Mars Environmental Dynamics Analyzer, MEDA. A Suite of Environmental Sensors for the Mars 2020 Mission

    J. A. Rodriguez-Manfredi;M. de la Torre Juárez;A. Alonso;V. Apéstigue

  • Pressure observations by the Curiosity rover: Initial results

    A.-M. Harri;M. Genzer;O. Kemppinen;H. Kahanpää

  • The meteorology of Gale Crater as determined from Rover Environmental Monitoring Station observations and numerical modeling. Part II: Interpretation

    Scot C.R. Rafkin;Jorge Pla-Garcia;Jorge Pla-Garcia;Melinda Kahre;Javier Gomez-Elvira

  • TRAMS: A new dynamic cloud model for Titan's methane clouds

    Erika L. Barth;Scot C. R. Rafkin

  • Mars Science Laboratory relative humidity observations: Initial results

    A.-M. Harri;M. Genzer;O. Kemppinen;J. Gomez-Elvira

  • Dynamics of the Venus upper atmosphere: Outstanding problems and new constraints expected from Venus Express

    S.W. Bougher;S. Rafkin;P. Drossart

  • The Martian surface radiation environment – a comparison of models and MSL/RAD measurements

    Daniel Matthiä;Bent Ehresmann;Henning Lohf;Jan Köhler

  • Assessment of Environments for Mars Science Laboratory Entry, Descent, and Surface Operations

    Ashwin R. Vasavada;Allen Chen;Jeffrey R. Barnes;P. Daniel Burkhart

  • Preliminary interpretation of the REMS pressure data from the first 100 sols of the MSL mission

    R. M. Haberle;J. Gómez-Elvira;M. de la Torre Juárez;A.-M. Harri

Frequent Co-Authors

Ashwin R. Vasavada
Ashwin R. Vasavada California Institute of Technology
Robert M. Haberle
Robert M. Haberle Ames Research Center
Nilton O. Renno
Nilton O. Renno University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David M. Kass
David M. Kass California Institute of Technology
Mark T. Lemmon
Mark T. Lemmon Space Science Institute
Claire E. Newman
Claire E. Newman University of Oxford
Sushil K. Atreya
Sushil K. Atreya University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark I. Richardson
Mark I. Richardson California Institute of Technology
Bruce A. Cantor
Bruce A. Cantor Malin Space Science Systems (United States)
David C. Catling
David C. Catling University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. An online geology degree offers a strong foundation in earth processes, crucial for roles in natural resource management and environmental consulting.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is another vital area, combining technology and spatial analysis to address environmental challenges. The best GIS programs equip students with skills to analyze environmental data and support planning and conservation efforts.

Public policy and administration also play a key role in environmental management. Pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration can prepare graduates for leadership positions in environmental agencies and nonprofit organizations focused on sustainability.

Additionally, understanding human behavior and social factors is essential for effective environmental solutions. An best online bachelor degree in sociology provides insights into societal impacts and community engagement critical to environmental projects.

Best Scientists Citing Scot C. R. Rafkin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles