World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 61 1918 1726 950 840 186 10916

Peter J. Stambrook publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter J. Stambrook between 1967 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter J. Stambrook published across 58 years, from 1967 to 2024, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 1994. 1 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 1994. 1967: 2 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 4 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1967 2024

216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter J. Stambrook: publications per year, 1967 to 2024
Year Publications
1967 2
1968 0
1969 0
1970 2
1971 0
1972 3
1973 1
1974 2
1975 2
1976 2
1977 0
1978 3
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 4
1985 2
1986 3
1987 1
1988 2
1989 4
1990 3
1991 5
1992 3
1993 9
1994 17
1995 7
1996 11
1997 14
1998 4
1999 13
2000 10
2001 4
2002 11
2003 3
2004 8
2005 3
2006 4
2007 6
2008 5
2009 1
2010 6
2011 6
2012 2
2013 3
2014 4
2015 3
2016 3
2017 2
2018 3
2019 0
2020 1
2021 2
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 216
Download as CSV

Peter J. Stambrook publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Stambrook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 177–186 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 186 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110 186
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter J. Stambrook D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Stambrook sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120 61
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Peter J. Stambrook is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati Medical Center in the United States and has a research focus spanning Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work emphasizes oncology, molecular biology, and cell biology, with additional contributions to neuroscience and biological psychiatry.

The scientist's recent publications demonstrate engagement with multiple aspects of cancer biology, bone metabolism, and molecular mechanisms. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Therapeutically leveraging GABAA receptors in cancer" (2021, Experimental Biology and Medicine)
  • "Treatment of osteoporosis with a modified zeolite shows beneficial effects in an osteoporotic rat model and a human clinical trial" (2020, Experimental Biology and Medicine)
  • "BRUCE preserves genomic stability in the male germline of mice" (2020, Cell Death and Differentiation)
  • "Nardilysin-regulated scission mechanism activates polo-like kinase 3 to suppress the development of pancreatic cancer" (2024, Nature Communications)
  • "Nardilysin-Regulated Scission Mechanism Activates Polo-like Kinase 3 to Suppress the Development of Pancreatic Cancer" (2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))

Key coauthors frequently collaborating with Peter J. Stambrook include Jianhua Ling, Chi-Lin Tsai, Wenjuan Yin, Yu Cao, and Ya'an Kang.

The scientist has published multiple works in the following venues:

  • Experimental Biology and Medicine
  • Cell Death and Differentiation
  • Nature Communications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Research topics covered by their work include:

  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Bone Metabolism and Diseases

Fields of study associated with Peter J. Stambrook's research comprise Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with subfields including Oncology, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Biological Psychiatry.

Peter J. Stambrook has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 2007.

Best Publications

  • In vitro evidence that metabolic cooperation is responsible for the bystander effect observed with HSV tk retroviral gene therapy.

    Wan Li Bi;Linda M. Parysek;Ronald Warnick;Peter J. Stambrook

  • Embryonic stem cells and somatic cells differ in mutation frequency and type

    Rachel B. Cervantes;James R. Stringer;Changshun Shao;Jay A. Tischfield

  • Centrosome hyperamplification in human cancer: chromosome instability induced by p53 mutation and/or Mdm2 overexpression

    Patrick E. Carroll;Masaru Okuda;Henning F. Horn;Paul Biddinger

  • Restoration of an absent G1 arrest and protection from apoptosis in embryonic stem cells after ionizing radiation.

    Yiling Hong;Peter J. Stambrook

  • Plk3 functionally links DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis at least in part via the p53 pathway.

    Suqing Xie;Huiyun Wu;Qi Wang;John P. Cogswell

  • The human Ha-ras oncogene induces genomic instability in murine fibroblasts within one cell cycle

    Nicholas C. Denko;Amato J. Giaccia;James R. Stringer;Peter J. Stambrook

  • The RAS oncogene induces genomic instability in thyroid PCCL3 cells via the MAPK pathway.

    Harold I Saavedra;Jeffrey A Knauf;Jill M Shirokawa;Jianwei Wang

  • Altered hematopoiesis, behavior, and sexual function in μ opioid receptor-deficient mice

    Mingting Tian;Hal E. Broxmeyer;Yi Fan;Zhennan Lai

  • Mammalian Polo-like kinase 3 (Plk3) is a multifunctional protein involved in stress response pathways

    El Mustapha Bahassi;Christopher W Conn;David L Myer;Robert F Hennigan

  • The checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2 regulate the functional associations between hBRCA2 and Rad51 in response to DNA damage.

    E M Bahassi;J L Ovesen;A L Riesenberg;W Z Bernstein

  • Hypoxic Activation of Nuclear Factor-κB Is Mediated by a Ras and Raf Signaling Pathway and Does Not Involve MAP Kinase (ERK1 or ERK2)

    Albert C. Koong;Eunice Y. Chen;Nahid F. Mivechi;Nicholas C. Denko

  • Nucleotide sequence and organization of the mouse adenine phosphoribosyltransferase gene: presence of a coding region common to animal and bacterial phosphoribosyltransferases that has a variable intron/exon arrangement.

    Michael K. Dush;James M. Sikela;Sohaib A. Khan;Jay A. Tischfield

  • DNA Repair in Murine Embryonic Stem Cells and Differentiated Cells

    Elisia D. Tichy;Peter J. Stambrook

  • The Role of the p53 Tumor Suppressor Gene in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

    John K. Field;Zlatko P. Pavelic;Demetrios A. Spandidos;Peter J. Stambrook

  • Mouse embryonic stem cells, but not somatic cells, predominantly use homologous recombination to repair double-strand DNA breaks.

    Elisia D. Tichy;Resmi Pillai;Li Deng;Li Liang

  • Human Prk Is a Conserved Protein Serine/Threonine Kinase Involved in Regulating M Phase Functions

    Bin Ouyang;Huiqi Pan;Luo Lu;Jian Li

  • High Frequency in Vivo Loss of Heterozygosity Is Primarily a Consequence of Mitotic Recombination

    P K Gupta;A Sahota;S A Boyadjiev;S Bye

  • Protein and messenger RNA expression of connexin43 in astrocytomas: implications in brain tumor gene therapy

    Nobusada Shinoura;Lin Chen;Maqsood A. Wani;Young Gyu Kim

  • Loss of microRNA-128 promotes cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration.

    Wei Huang;Wei Huang;Yuliang Feng;Jialiang Liang;Hao Yu

  • Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase-deficient mice develop 2,8-dihydroxyadenine nephrolithiasis.

    S J Engle;M G Stockelman;J Chen;G Boivin

Frequent Co-Authors

Jay A. Tischfield
Jay A. Tischfield Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Changshun Shao
Changshun Shao Soochow University
James R. Stringer
James R. Stringer University of Cincinnati
George F. Babcock
George F. Babcock University of Cincinnati
Krešimir Pavelić
Krešimir Pavelić University of Rijeka
Ju Chen
Ju Chen University of California, San Diego
Gregory P. Boivin
Gregory P. Boivin Wright State University
Amato J. Giaccia
Amato J. Giaccia Stanford University
Hsiao Sheng Liu
Hsiao Sheng Liu National Cheng Kung University
James M. Sikela
James M. Sikela University of Colorado Denver

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology in the USA can open doors to diverse health and science careers, many of which now offer flexible online pathways. If you are interested in helping others communicate, pursuing a career through accredited speech pathology programs allows you to earn recognized credentials while meeting national standards. For students whose undergraduate degree isn't in speech-language pathology, there are online bridge programs non-SLP majors can use to make the transition into this rewarding field.

Those drawn to healthcare might consider nursing. There are now many accelerated nursing programs for non nurses that allow career changers to become registered nurses more quickly via online study and short clinical residencies. Within the nursing profession, specializing further can lead to in-demand roles; for example, salaries for those following the psychiatric care route can be explored with this overview of psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner salary by state.

Combining an interest in molecular biology with these flexible online options can help you build a dynamic, science-based career in the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Stambrook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles