World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
64
Citations
15564
World Ranking
9612
National Ranking
733

Mike Hubank publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Hubank sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 230 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mike Hubank D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Hubank sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Insertional mutagenesis combined with acquired somatic mutations causes leukemogenesis following gene therapy of SCID-X1 patients

    Steven J. Howe;Marc R. Mansour;Kerstin Schwarzwaelder;Cynthia Bartholomae

  • Epilepsy, ataxia, sensorineural deafness, tubulopathy, and KCNJ10 mutations.

    Detlef Bockenhauer;Sally Feather;Horia C Stanescu;Sascha Bandulik

  • Risk HLA-DQA1 and PLA(2)R1 alleles in idiopathic membranous nephropathy

    H.C. Stanescu;M. Arcos-Burgos;A. Medlar;D. Bockenhauer

  • Same Exposure but Two Radically Different Responses to Antibiotics: Resilience of the Salivary Microbiome versus Long-Term Microbial Shifts in Feces

    Egija Zaura;Bernd W. Brandt;M. Joost Teixeira de Mattos;Mark J. Buijs

  • Photoreceptor precursors derived from three-dimensional embryonic stem cell cultures integrate and mature within adult degenerate retina

    Anai Gonzalez-Cordero;Emma L West;Rachael A Pearson;Yanai Duran

  • Human Coronavirus OC43 Associated with Fatal Encephalitis

    Sofia Morfopoulou;Julianne R Brown;E Graham Davies;Glenn Anderson

  • Genetic complexity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy revealed by high-throughput sequencing

    Luis R Lopes;Anna Zekavati;Petros Syrris;Mike Hubank

  • Infant high grade gliomas comprise multiple subgroups characterized by novel targetable gene fusions and favorable outcomes

    Matthew Clarke;Alan Mackay;Britta Ismer;Britta Ismer;Jessica Chiara Pickles

  • Circulating tumour DNA analysis to direct therapy in advanced breast cancer (plasmaMATCH): a multicentre, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial.

    Nicholas C Turner;Nicholas C Turner;Belinda Kingston;Lucy S Kilburn;Sarah Kernaghan

  • Human IFNAR2 deficiency : lessons for antiviral immunity

    Christopher J. A. Duncan;Christopher J. A. Duncan;Siti M. B. Mohamad;Siti M. B. Mohamad;Dan Frushard Young;Andrew J. Skelton

  • Pandemic peak SARS-CoV-2 infection and seroconversion rates in London frontline health-care workers.

    Catherine F Houlihan;Nina Vora;Thomas Byrne;Dan Lewer

  • Astrovirus VA1/HMO-C: An Increasingly Recognized Neurotropic Pathogen in Immunocompromised Patients

    Julianne R. Brown;Sofia Morfopoulou;Jonathan Hubb;Warren A. Emmett

  • Hypomethylation of WNT5A, CRIP1 and S100P in prostate cancer

    Q Wang;M Williamson;S Bott;N Brookman-Amissah

  • Longitudinal Liquid Biopsy and Mathematical Modeling of Clonal Evolution Forecast Time to Treatment Failure in the PROSPECT-C Phase II Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trial.

    Khurum H. Khan;Khurum H. Khan;David Cunningham;Benjamin Werner;Georgios Vlachogiannis

  • A novel CDK inhibitor, CYC202 (R-roscovitine), overcomes the defect in p53-dependent apoptosis in B-CLL by down-regulation of genes involved in transcription regulation and survival

    Azra J. Alvi;Belinda Austen;Victoria J. Weston;Christopher Fegan

  • Homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency and PARP inhibition activity in primary triple negative breast cancer.

    Neha Chopra;Holly Tovey;Alex Pearson;Ros Cutts

  • Sperm-Induced Modification of the Oviductal Gene Expression Profile After Natural Insemination in Mice

    Alireza Fazeli;Nabeel A. Affara;Michael Hubank;William V. Holt

  • DNA-dependent protein kinase is not required for the p53-dependent response to DNA damage

    Gretchen S. Jimenez;Fredrik Bryntesson;Maria I. Torres-Arzayus;Anne Priestley

  • Ranked prediction of p53 targets using hidden variable dynamic modeling

    Martino Barenco;Daniela Tomescu;Daniel Brewer;Robin Callard

  • A global profile of replicative polymerase usage

    Yasukazu Daigaku;Andrea Keszthelyi;Carolin A Müller;Izumi Miyabe

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas C. Turner
Nicholas C. Turner Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Chris Jones
Chris Jones Institute of Cancer Research
Robin Callard
Robin Callard University College London
David Cunningham
David Cunningham Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Judith M. Bliss
Judith M. Bliss Institute of Cancer Research
Alan Mackay
Alan Mackay Institute of Cancer Research
Ian Chau
Ian Chau Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Charles Swanton
Charles Swanton The Francis Crick Institute
Michael Howell
Michael Howell The Francis Crick Institute
Judith Breuer
Judith Breuer University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mike Hubank

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles