World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
5516
World Ranking
7505
National Ranking
2667

Michael Notaro publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Notaro sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 107 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Michael Notaro D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Notaro sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Notaro is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research spans various fields related to environmental and earth sciences, with a focus on climate variability, hydrology, and atmospheric phenomena.

The main fields of study for Michael Notaro include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these broader fields, their work focuses on several subfields such as:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

The primary topics addressed in their research incorporate:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Their recent publications cover a range of these topics and include:

  • Cold Season Performance of the NU-WRF Regional Climate Model in the Great Lakes Region, 2021, Journal of Hydrometeorology
  • Large lakes in climate models: A Great Lakes case study on the usability of CMIP5, 2021, Journal of Great Lakes Research
  • Quantifying the drivers and predictability of seasonal changes in African fire, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Disproving the Bodélé Depression as the Primary Source of Dust Fertilizing the Amazon Rainforest, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Future winters present a complex energetic landscape of decreased costs and reduced risk for a freeze-tolerant amphibian, the Wood Frog (Lithobates sylvaticus), 2020, Global Change Biology

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Michael Notaro include:

  • Yan Yu
  • Jiafu Mao
  • Laura Briley
  • Richard B. Rood
  • Yafang Zhong

The scholar has published multiple works in the following venues:

  • Climate Dynamics
  • International Journal of Climatology
  • Journal of Great Lakes Research
  • Nature Communications
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Assessing Global Vegetation–Climate Feedbacks from Observations*

    Zhengyu Liu;M. Notaro;J. Kutzbach;Naizhuang Liu

  • Climatology of summer Shamal wind in the Middle East

    Yan Yu;Michael Notaro;Olga V. Kalashnikova;Michael J. Garay

  • Trajectory analysis of Saudi Arabian dust storms

    Michael Notaro;Fahad Alkolibi;Eyad Fadda;Fawzieh Bakhrjy

  • Regime shift in Arabian dust activity, triggered by persistent Fertile Crescent drought

    Michael Notaro;Yan Yu;Olga V. Kalashnikova

  • Simulating the transient evolution and abrupt change of Northern Africa atmosphere–ocean–terrestrial ecosystem in the Holocene ☆

    Z Liu;Yi Wang;R Gallimore;F Gasse

  • On the cause of abrupt vegetation collapse in North Africa during the Holocene: Climate variability vs. vegetation feedback

    Zhengyu Liu;Zhengyu Liu;Yi Wang;Robert Gallimore;Michael Notaro

  • Observed Vegetation–Climate Feedbacks in the United States*

    M. Notaro;Z. Liu;J. W. Williams

  • Widespread drought episodes in the western Great Lakes region during the past 2000 years: Geographic extent and potential mechanisms

    Robert K. Booth;Michael Notaro;Stephen T. Jackson;John E. Kutzbach

  • Influence of the Laurentian Great Lakes on Regional Climate

    Michael Notaro;Kathleen Holman;Azar Zarrin;Elody Fluck

  • Twenty-First-Century Projections of Snowfall and Winter Severity across Central-Eastern North America*,+

    Michael Notaro;David Lorenz;Christopher Hoving;Michael Schummer

  • Climatic controls on the interannual to decadal variability in Saudi Arabian dust activity: Toward the development of a seasonal dust prediction model

    Yan Yu;Michael Notaro;Zhengyu Liu;Zhengyu Liu;Fuyao Wang

  • Global Vegetation and Climate Change due to Future Increases in CO2 as Projected by a Fully Coupled Model with Dynamic Vegetation

    Michael Notaro;Steve Vavrus;Zhengyu Liu

  • Recent accelerated warming of the Laurentian Great Lakes: Physical drivers

    Yafang Zhong;Michael Notaro;Stephen J. Vavrus;Michael J. Foster

  • Complex seasonal cycle of ecohydrology in the Southwest United States

    Michael Notaro;Zhengyu Liu;Robert G. Gallimore;John W. Williams

  • Projected vegetation changes for the American Southwest: combined dynamic modeling and bioclimatic-envelope approach.

    Michael Notaro;Adrien Mauss;John W. Williams

  • Dynamically Downscaled Projections of Lake-Effect Snow in the Great Lakes Basin*,+

    Michael Notaro;Val Bennington;Steve Vavrus

  • Model and Observational Analysis of the Northeast U.S. Regional Climate and Its Relationship to the PNA and NAO Patterns during Early Winter

    M. Notaro;W.-C. Wang;W. Gong

  • Climate change surpasses land-use change in the contracting range boundary of a winter-adapted mammal.

    Sean M. Sultaire;Jonathan N. Pauli;Karl J. Martin;Michael W. Meyer

  • Disproportionate magnitude of climate change in United States national parks

    Patrick Gonzalez;Patrick Gonzalez;Fuyao Wang;Michael Notaro;Daniel J Vimont

  • Identification and Characterization of Dust Source Regions Across North Africa and the Middle East Using MISR Satellite Observations

    Yan Yu;Yan Yu;Olga V. Kalashnikova;Michael J. Garay;Huikyo Lee

  • Simulation of Heavy Lake-Effect Snowstorms across the Great Lakes Basin by RegCM4: Synoptic Climatology and Variability*,+

    Michael Notaro;Azar Zarrin;Steve Vavrus;Val Bennington

  • Assessing temporal and spatial variations in atmospheric dust over Saudi Arabia through satellite, radiometric, and station data

    Yan Yu;Michael Notaro;Zhengyu Liu;Zhengyu Liu;Olga Kalashnikova

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhengyu Liu
Zhengyu Liu The Ohio State University
John W. Williams
John W. Williams University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jiafu Mao
Jiafu Mao Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Xiaoying Shi
Xiaoying Shi Oak Ridge National Laboratory
John E. Kutzbach
John E. Kutzbach University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jonathan N. Pauli
Jonathan N. Pauli University of Wisconsin–Madison
Forrest M. Hoffman
Forrest M. Hoffman Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Benjamin Zuckerberg
Benjamin Zuckerberg University of Wisconsin–Madison
Samuel Levis
Samuel Levis National Center for Atmospheric Research
David S. Gutzler
David S. Gutzler University of New Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs such as an cheapest dsw program provide skills in social work that complement environmental advocacy and community engagement. This is increasingly important in addressing environmental justice issues.

If flexibility and broad education appeal to you, an accredited affordable online general studies degree offers a versatile foundation. It allows students to tailor coursework toward environmental topics while gaining interdisciplinary knowledge.

For students seeking less intensive pathways, considering one of the easiest bachelor's degree options may be beneficial. These programs can provide quicker entry into environmental-related roles, particularly when focused on relevant subjects like sustainability and conservation.

Specialized roles, such as a geologist, are vital within environmental fields. Pursuing a geologist degree online equips students with technical expertise needed to analyze earth processes and contribute to environmental protection efforts.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Notaro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles