World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
59
Citations
9194
World Ranking
2042
National Ranking
1015

Mary L. Standaert publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary L. Standaert sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 104 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Mary L. Standaert D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary L. Standaert sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary L. Standaert is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their academic profile reflects active involvement in research and scholarship within this institution.

There are no recent papers listed under their name, nor are there any recorded frequent co-authors or regular publication venues based on the available data. Additionally, no information is provided regarding main fields or subfields of study, main topics of research focus, or any book publications authored by them.

There are no awards or distinctions recorded for Mary L. Standaert in the current data set. They are listed as an active researcher, with no indication of being deceased.

Best Publications

  • Protein kinase C-zeta as a downstream effector of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase during insulin stimulation in rat adipocytes. Potential role in glucose transport.

    Mary L. Standaert;Lamar Galloway;Purushotham Karnam;Gautam Bandyopadhyay

  • Activation of Protein Kinase C (α, β, and ζ) by Insulin in 3T3/L1 Cells TRANSFECTION STUDIES SUGGEST A ROLE FOR PKC-η IN GLUCOSE TRANSPORT

    Gautam Bandyopadhyay;Mary L. Standaert;LiMing Zhao;Bingzhi Yu

  • Evidence for involvement of protein kinase C (PKC)-zeta and noninvolvement of diacylglycerol-sensitive PKCs in insulin-stimulated glucose transport in L6 myotubes.

    Gautam Bandyopadhyay;Mary L. Standaert;Lamar Galloway;Jorge Moscat

  • Insulin Activates Protein Kinases C-ζ and C-λ by an Autophosphorylation-dependent Mechanism and Stimulates Their Translocation to GLUT4 Vesicles and Other Membrane Fractions in Rat Adipocytes

    Mary L. Standaert;Gautam Bandyopadhyay;Liliam Perez;Debbie Price

  • Insulin binding to the human lymphocyte receptor. Evaluation of the negative cooperativity model.

    R J Pollet;M L Standaert;B A Haase

  • Insulin-Sensitive Protein Kinases (Atypical Protein Kinase C and Protein Kinase B/Akt): Actions and Defects in Obesity and Type II Diabetes:

    Robert V. Farese;Mini P. Sajan;Mary L. Standaert

  • Insulin increases membrane and cytosolic protein kinase C activity in BC3H-1 myocytes.

    D R Cooper;T S Konda;M L Standaert;J S Davis

  • Insulin and PIP3 activate PKC-zeta by mechanisms that are both dependent and independent of phosphorylation of activation loop (T410) and autophosphorylation (T560) sites.

    Mary L. Standaert;Gautam Bandyopadhyay;Yoshinori Kanoh;Mini P. Sajan

  • Effects of transiently expressed atypical (zeta, lambda), conventional (alpha, beta) and novel (delta, epsilon) protein kinase C isoforms on insulin-stimulated translocation of epitope-tagged GLUT4 glucose transporters in rat adipocytes: specific interchangeable effects of protein kinases C-zeta and C-lambda.

    G Bandyopadhyay;M L Standaert;U Kikkawa;Y Ono

  • Protein Kinase C-ζ and Phosphoinositide-dependent Protein Kinase-1 Are Required for Insulin-induced Activation of ERK in Rat Adipocytes

    Mini P. Sajan;Mary L. Standaert;Gautam Bandyopadhyay;Michael J. Quon

  • Effects of transiently expressed atypical (ζ, λ), conventional (α, β) and novel (δ, ɛ) protein kinase C isoforms on insulin-stimulated translocation of epitope-tagged GLUT4 glucose transporters in rat adipocytes: specific interchangeable effects of protein kinases C-ζ and C-λ

    Gautam Bandyopadhyay;Mary L. Standaert;Ushio Kikkawa;Yoshitaka Ono

  • Effects of Insulin on Diacylglycerol–Protein Kinase C Signaling in Rat Diaphragm and Soleus Muscles and Relationship to Glucose Transport

    Tatsuo Ishizuka;Denise R Cooper;Herman Hernandez;Donna Buckley

  • Dependence of Insulin-Stimulated Glucose Transporter 4 Translocation on 3-Phosphoinositide-Dependent Protein Kinase-1 and Its Target Threonine-410 in the Activation Loop of Protein Kinase C-ζ

    G. Bandyopadhyay;M. L. Standaert;M. P. Sajan;L. M. Karnitz

  • Activation and Translocation of Rho (and ADP Ribosylation Factor) by Insulin in Rat Adipocytes APPARENT INVOLVEMENT OF PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASE

    Purushotham Karnam;Mary L. Standaert;Lamar Galloway;Robert V. Farese

  • Macromolecular characterization by sedimentation equilibrium in the preparative ultracentrifuge.

    R J Pollet;B A Haase;M L Standaert

  • PKC-ζ Mediates Insulin Effects on Glucose Transport in Cultured Preadipocyte-Derived Human Adipocytes

    Gautam Bandyopadhyay;Mini P. Sajan;Yoshinori Kanoh;Mary L. Standaert

  • Glucose activates protein kinase C-zeta /lambda through proline-rich tyrosine kinase-2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase, and phospholipase D: a novel mechanism for activating glucose transporter translocation.

    Gautam Bandyopadhyay;Mini P. Sajan;Yoshinori Kanoh;Mary L. Standaert

  • Interaction of insulin-like growth factors with a nonfusing mouse muscle cell line: binding, action, and receptor down-regulation.

    Monique A. De Vroede;Joyce A. Romanus;Mary L. Standaert;Robert J. Pollet

  • Thiazolidinedione Treatment Enhances Insulin Effects on Protein Kinase C-ζ/λ Activation and Glucose Transport in Adipocytes of Nondiabetic and Goto-Kakizaki Type II Diabetic Rats

    Yoshinori Kanoh;Gautam Bandyopadhyay;Mini P. Sajan;Mary L. Standaert

  • Okadaic acid activates atypical protein kinase C (zeta/lambda) in rat and 3T3/L1 adipocytes. An apparent requirement for activation of Glut4 translocation and glucose transport.

    M.L. Standaert;G. Bandyopadhyay;M.P. Sajan;L. Cong

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert V. Farese
Robert V. Farese Harvard University
Michael J. Quon
Michael J. Quon University of Maryland, Baltimore
Jorge Moscat
Jorge Moscat Cornell University
Ushio Kikkawa
Ushio Kikkawa Kobe University
Michael Leitges
Michael Leitges University of Oslo
Ivan Dikic
Ivan Dikic Goethe University Frankfurt
Harald Mischak
Harald Mischak University of Glasgow
Kiran Musunuru
Kiran Musunuru University of Pennsylvania
Eric Wickstrom
Eric Wickstrom Thomas Jefferson University
Matthew M. Rechler
Matthew M. Rechler National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your expertise in molecular biology opens up numerous opportunities across academia, research, and industry. For those needing flexibility, enrolling in programs offered by not for profit online colleges provides a strong foundation rooted in accredited, reputable education.

Many professionals value study options tailored to unique needs. For current or former service members, the best military friendly colleges can help make education accessible and supportive, helping you transition into molecular biology or related scientific careers.

If you are interested in the intersection between science and helping communities, fields such as social work and psychology offer meaningful pathways. Explore the best online msw programs to combine biological knowledge with community outreach. Alternatively, an online masters in psychology may complement your background and open clinical or research-based roles.

With so many specialized online programs linked to biology and life sciences, choosing a route that fits your career goals and lifestyle has never been easier.

Best Scientists Citing Mary L. Standaert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles