World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
61
Citations
16911
World Ranking
1891
National Ranking
151

Mark Meuth publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Meuth sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 120 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Mark Meuth D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Meuth sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Meuth is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their academic career is primarily centered at this institution, contributing to the university's research output and scholarly community.

Available data does not include recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specific fields of study linked to Mark Meuth. Similarly, no main topics of work or subfields of study have been documented.

There are no records indicating awards or honors received by Mark Meuth. The absence of citations related to publications or recognitions suggests either a low public profile or limited available bibliometric data.

The scientific profile lacks detailed documentation of research themes, which may limit comprehensive assessment of their specific contributions to academic literature. However, affiliation with a major research university like Sheffield implies engagement with ongoing scientific discourse and educational activities.

Mark Meuth is currently living, and the neutral tone of the profile respects available information without speculation. The focus remains on verified data, presenting a straightforward account of their academic positioning.

Best Publications

  • Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase

    Helen E. Bryant;Nilklas Schultz;Huw D. Thomas;Kayan M. Parker

  • An established pre-adipose cell line and its differentiation in culture

    Howard Green;Mark Meuth

  • Mutator phenotypes in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines

    Nitai P. Bhattacharyya;Adonis Skandalis;Anil Ganesh;Joanna Groden

  • Distinct MicroRNA Alterations Characterize High- and Low-Grade Bladder Cancer

    James W.F. Catto;Saiful Miah;Helen C. Owen;Helen Bryant

  • Promoter Hypermethylation Is Associated With Tumor Location, Stage, and Subsequent Progression in Transitional Cell Carcinoma

    James W.F. Catto;Abdel Rahmene Azzouzi;Ishtiaq Rehman;Kenneth M. Feeley

  • Different roles for nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination following replication arrest in mammalian cells.

    Cecilia Lundin;Klaus Erixon;Catherine Arnaudeau;Niklas Schultz

  • The molecular basis of mutations induced by deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate pool imbalances in mammalian cells.

    Mark Meuth

  • Mapping replication units in animal cells

    Shlomo Handeli;Avihu Klar;Mark Meuth;Howard Cedar

  • Apoptosis Induced by Overexpression of hMSH2 or hMLH1

    Hong Zhang;Burt Richards;Teresa Wilson;Michael Lloyd

  • Induction of a deoxycytidineless state in cultured mammalian cells by bromodeoxyuridine

    Mark Meuth;Howard Green

  • Promoter Hypermethylation Identifies Progression Risk in Bladder Cancer

    David R. Yates;Ishtiaq Rehman;Maysam F. Abbod;Mark Meuth

  • Chk1 and p21 Cooperate to Prevent Apoptosis during DNA Replication Fork Stress

    Rene Rodriguez;Mark Meuth

  • Molecular Detection of Localized Prostate Cancer Using Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR on Urinary Cells Obtained Following Prostate Massage

    Morgan Rouprêt;Vincent Hupertan;David R. Yates;James W.F. Catto

  • Association of a Common Variant of the CASP8 Gene With Reduced Risk of Breast Cancer

    Gordon MacPherson;Catherine S. Healey;M. Dawn Teare;Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian

  • Enhanced H2AX phosphorylation, DNA replication fork arrest, and cell death in the absence of Chk1.

    Mary E. Gagou;Pedro Zuazua-Villar;Mark Meuth

  • Spontaneous deletion formation at the aprt locus of hamster cells: the presence of short sequence homologies and dyad symmetries at deletion termini.

    J Nalbantoglu;D Hartley;G Phear;G Tear

  • Conditional Mutator Phenotypes in hMSH2-Deficient Tumor Cell Lines

    Burt Richards;Hong Zhang;Geraldine Phear;Mark Meuth

  • Characterization of a mutator gene in Chinese hamster ovary cells

    Mark Meuth;Nicole L'Heureux-Huard;Marie Trudel

  • A potential role for the XRCC2 R188H polymorphic site in DNA-damage repair and breast cancer

    Saeed Rafii;Paul O'Regan;George Xinarianos;Iman Azmy

  • Distinct patterns of microsatellite instability are seen in tumours of the urinary tract.

    James W F Catto;Abdel-Rahmene Azzouzi;Najla Amira;Ishtiaq Rehman

Frequent Co-Authors

James W.F. Catto
James W.F. Catto University of Sheffield
Freddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy University of Oxford
Thomas Helleday
Thomas Helleday Karolinska Institute
Simon S. Cross
Simon S. Cross University of Sheffield
Angela Cox
Angela Cox University of Sheffield
Peter W. Andrews
Peter W. Andrews University of Sheffield
Derek A. Linkens
Derek A. Linkens University of Sheffield
Olivier Cussenot
Olivier Cussenot Université Paris Cité
Maysam F. Abbod
Maysam F. Abbod Brunel University London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to a variety of related academic and career opportunities. Online programs now make it easier than ever for students and working professionals to advance or pivot their careers in healthcare, research, or education without relocating.

For those interested in nursing, several flexible routes are available. Non-nurses can fast-track into advanced roles with direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online. Registered nurses looking to upgrade their qualifications often compare programs; you can learn more by reviewing chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program.

Affordability is a top concern for many. When transitioning from a BSN to an MSN qualification, understanding the bsn to msn online programs is key to making cost-effective decisions.

To ensure quality and recognition, always choose nonprofit online universities that are accredited and respected. This approach can help molecular biology graduates and career shifters find flexible, reputable programs that align with their long-term professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Meuth

Recently Published Articles