What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Operating system
- Computer network
- Artificial intelligence
His scientific interests lie mostly in Multimedia, Mobile device, Controller, Computer graphics and Advertising.
The Multimedia study combines topics in areas such as Event, Terminal and Computer network.
His work on Identifier as part of general Computer network research is frequently linked to Connection, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.
The concepts of his Mobile device study are interwoven with issues in Mechanism, Interactive kiosk and Wireless access point.
His work carried out in the field of Computer graphics brings together such families of science as Object, Augmented reality and Private information retrieval.
His Human–computer interaction study incorporates themes from Computer security and Simulation.
His most cited work include:
- Multi-player, multi-touch table for use in wagering game systems (287 citations)
- Integrating social communities and wagering games (262 citations)
- Wagering game with special-event eligibility feature based on passive game play (183 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Multimedia, Computer network, Controller, Human–computer interaction and Computer security.
His Multimedia research focuses on Firmware and how it connects with Table.
His work focuses on many connections between Computer network and other disciplines, such as Event, that overlap with his field of interest in Artificial intelligence.
The various areas that Mark B. Gagner examines in his Controller study include Variable, Input device and Real-time computing.
His Human–computer interaction research incorporates elements of Session and Simulation.
In his study, Interactive kiosk and Identifier is inextricably linked to Mobile device, which falls within the broad field of Computer security.
He most often published in these fields:
- Multimedia (24.40%)
- Computer network (18.45%)
- Controller (14.88%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2016)?
- Human–computer interaction (13.10%)
- Multimedia (24.40%)
- Mobile device (11.31%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Mark B. Gagner mainly focuses on Human–computer interaction, Multimedia, Mobile device, Event and Simulation.
His work deals with themes such as Tracking, Artificial intelligence, Session and Wearable computer, which intersect with Human–computer interaction.
His Multimedia research includes elements of Terminal, Process and Presentation.
His Mobile device research incorporates themes from Computer hardware, Computer graphics, Identification, Computer security and Identifier.
His research integrates issues of Computer network and Set in his study of Event.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Theme, Graphical content and Social network in addition to Simulation.
Between 2012 and 2016, his most popular works were:
- Integrating social communities and wagering games (262 citations)
- Methods Of Receiving Electronic Wagers In A Wagering Game Via A Handheld Electronic Wager Input Device (55 citations)
- Controlling three-dimensional presentation of wagering game content (48 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Operating system
- Artificial intelligence
- Computer network
Human–computer interaction, Mobile device, Multimedia, Computer security and Process management are his primary areas of study.
His research in Human–computer interaction intersects with topics in Interface, Wearable computer, Simulation and Social network.
Mark B. Gagner has included themes like Input device and Identification in his Mobile device study.
His Multimedia study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as View based and Stereoscopy, Autostereoscopy.
His work on Computer security is being expanded to include thematically relevant topics such as Wireless.
His studies link Advertising with Process management.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
