World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
4934
World Ranking
10889
National Ranking
4529

Larry J. Pacey publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Larry J. Pacey sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 96 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Larry J. Pacey D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Larry J. Pacey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • The Internet
  • Software

Larry J. Pacey mainly focuses on Multimedia, Outcome, Human–computer interaction, Advertising and Controller. Many of his studies on Multimedia involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Mobile device. His Outcome research incorporates themes from Volume, Input device, Software and Computer graphics.

His research integrates issues of Object, Selection and Feature in his study of Human–computer interaction. His study in Advertising is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Asset, Session, Data set, Marketing and Interactivity. Larry J. Pacey interconnects Event and Computer network in the investigation of issues within Controller.

His most cited work include:

  • Gaming machine having a community game with side wagering (286 citations)
  • Handheld wagering game system and methods for conducting wagering games thereupon (179 citations)
  • Interaction with 3D space in a gaming system (171 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Multimedia, Human–computer interaction, Controller, Computer graphics and Outcome are his primary areas of study. His Multimedia study combines topics in areas such as Presentation and Toolbar. His Human–computer interaction study incorporates themes from Advertising and Selection.

His study in Controller is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Mobile device, Computer network, Simulation and Feature. His Computer graphics study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Object, Computer vision, Video image and Display device. His studies examine the connections between Outcome and genetics, as well as such issues in Input device, with regards to Feature.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Multimedia (27.62%)
  • Human–computer interaction (21.90%)
  • Controller (20.95%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2014)?

  • Display device (8.57%)
  • Terminal (8.57%)
  • Event (12.38%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Display device, Terminal, Event, Multimedia and Real-time computing. His Display device research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Communication interface and Computer graphics. The concepts of his Terminal study are interwoven with issues in Computer hardware and Engineering drawing.

The Event study combines topics in areas such as Telecommunications and Computer network. As part of his studies on Multimedia, Larry J. Pacey often connects relevant areas like PATH. His study looks at the relationship between Simulation and fields such as Mobile device, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.

Between 2011 and 2014, his most popular works were:

  • Mobile device applications for casinos (48 citations)
  • Online immersive environment and wagering games (26 citations)
  • Wagering game with alternating picks (23 citations)

Best Publications

  • Gaming machine having a community game with side wagering

    Allon G. Englman;Larry J. Pacey;Peter R. Anderson;Jeremy M. Hornik

  • Handheld wagering system and wagering methods thereupon

    Vladimir I Arezina;Mark B Gagner;Jeremy M Hornik;Larry J Pacey

  • Interaction with 3D space in a gaming system

    Mark B. Gagner;Jacob C. Greenberg;Mark Johnson;Andrew Landsman

  • Handheld device for wagering games

    Vladimir I. Arezina;Thomas M. Kopera;Larry J. Pacey;David Pryor

  • Gaming device for wagering on multiple game outcomes

    Jeremy M. Hornik;Larry J. Pacey

  • Wagering game with persistent state of game assets affecting other players

    Allon G. Englman;Larry J. Pacey;Mark B. Gagner;Jeremy M. Hornik

  • Wagering game with overlying transmissive display for providing enhanced game features

    Dion K. Aoki;John D. Flint;Philip B. Gelber;Benjamin T. Gomez

  • Wagering game with bonus-game assets that can be preserved for subsequent gaming sessions

    Peter Flemming;Benjamin Gomez;Larry Pacey

  • Handheld gaming machines and system therefor

    Mark B. Gagner;Shridhar P. Joshi;Larry J. Pacey;Craig J. Sylla

  • Wagering game system with community gaming system

    Larry J. Pacey;Joel R. Jaffe;Shridhar P. Joshi;Allon G. Englman

  • Gaming machine having multiple level progressive feature with player controlled outcome

    Allon G. Englman;Larry J. Pacey;Joel R. Jaffe

  • Wagering game with symbols forming an altered array or secondary array

    Dion K. Aoki;Allon G. Englman;Joel R. Jaffe;Shridhar P. Joshi

  • Wagering game with community award based on best selection from all players

    Allon G. Englman;Michael W. Mastropietro;Larry J. Pacey

  • Wagering game with community game having a persistent-state feature

    Jeremy M. Hornik;Joel R. Jaffe;Larry J. Pacey;Jamie Vann

  • Wagering game award system

    Mark B. Gagner;Jeremy M. Hornik;Shridhar P. Joshi;Mark C. Pace

  • Community gaming system outcome indicators

    Vladimir I. Arezina;Larry J. Pacey;Joel R. Jaffe;Shridhar P. Joshi

  • Game selection in a wagering game machine

    Shridhar P Joshi;Larry J Pacey;Richard T Schwartz;Muthu Velu

  • Transporting and using wagering game data

    Mark B. Gagner;Nevin J. Liber;Larry J. Pacey;Craig J. Sylla

  • Wagering game community environment

    Mark B. Gagner;Vernon W. Hamlin;Jeremy M. Hornik;Michael W. Mastropietro

  • Transient Or Persistent Game Play In Wagering Games

    Peter R. Anderson;Vincent P. Chan;Mark B. Gagner;Daniel Murphy

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark B. Gagner
Mark B. Gagner Siemens (Germany)
Joel R. Jaffe
Joel R. Jaffe Core Project Management Group, Inc.
Alfred Thomas
Alfred Thomas GEMINI DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education offers flexible options for advancing your computer science career. Many students begin with a bachelor of science in physics online, which provides a solid technical foundation and problem-solving skills valuable in tech roles.

Graduate studies can further boost job opportunities. If budget matters, consider the cheapest data science masters in USA, which blends affordable tuition with market-driven curricula in a fast-growing industry.

For those interested in hardware or systems, pursuing electrical engineering online tuition costs can be a smart way to gain interdisciplinary skills that overlap with computer science. Many online electrical engineering programs offer competitive rates and flexible schedules.

If you’re looking for a quicker pathway to a rewarding tech job, short-term certificate programs that pay well are available online. These certifications can help you specialize further or break into new fields—all with less time and financial investment.

Best Scientists Citing Larry J. Pacey

Recently Published Articles