World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anthony J. Baerlocher

Anthony J. Baerlocher

Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 100 152 145 11 10 178 28810

Anthony J. Baerlocher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anthony J. Baerlocher between 2000 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anthony J. Baerlocher published across 17 years, from 2000 to 2016, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2004. 1 of the 203 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2004. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 34 publications 2003: 25 publications 2004: 35 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication
2000 2016

203 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anthony J. Baerlocher: publications per year, 2000 to 2016
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 4
2002 34
2003 25
2004 35
2005 15
2006 20
2007 25
2008 15
2009 5
2010 4
2011 4
2012 6
2013 7
2014 2
2015 0
2016 1
Total 203
Download as CSV

Anthony J. Baerlocher publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony J. Baerlocher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 178 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421 178
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Anthony J. Baerlocher D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony J. Baerlocher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7 100
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Computer network
  • The Internet

His main research concerns Multimedia, Simulation, Scheme, Selection and Computer network. In his work, Event is strongly intertwined with Human–computer interaction, which is a subfield of Multimedia. His Simulation research incorporates elements of Reel and Arithmetic.

His Scheme research overlaps with Operations research and Computer security. His study in Selection intersects with areas of studies such as Set and Group. His Computer network research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Tournament, Controller, Real-time computing and Game play.

His most cited work include:

  • Gaming system having multiple gaming devices that share a multi-outcome display (559 citations)
  • Gaming device having a bonus scheme with multiple selection groups (515 citations)
  • Gaming device having a competition bonus scheme (429 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Multimedia, Selection, Simulation, Outcome and Scheme. Anthony J. Baerlocher studied Multimedia and Event that intersect with Real-time computing. His work investigates the relationship between Selection and topics such as Operations research that intersect with problems in Operations management.

His Simulation study incorporates themes from Computer hardware, Computer network and Electrical engineering. His research ties Advertising and Outcome together. He integrates several fields in his works, including Scheme, Arithmetic and Artificial intelligence.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Multimedia (30.73%)
  • Selection (18.05%)
  • Simulation (17.56%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2016)?

  • Multimedia (30.73%)
  • Outcome (14.63%)
  • Event (11.22%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Multimedia, Outcome, Event, Symbol and Controller. His work deals with themes such as Real-time computing and Mobile device, which intersect with Multimedia. He combines subjects such as Computer security, Session and Human–computer interaction with his study of Outcome.

His Human–computer interaction study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Interface and Operations research. Anthony J. Baerlocher focuses mostly in the field of Event, narrowing it down to matters related to Game client and, in some cases, Selection and Identifier. His Simulation research includes themes of Computer hardware and Arithmetic.

Between 2008 and 2016, his most popular works were:

  • Gaming system and method which enables multiple players to simultaneously play multiple individual games or group games on a central display (250 citations)
  • Gaming device having free game bonus with a changing multiplier (214 citations)
  • Gaming system, gaming device and method providing a first game and a plurality second wagering games each associated with a separate activatable component of the first game (198 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • The Internet
  • Statistics

His primary areas of investigation include Multimedia, Simulation, Symbol, Input device and Event. His study in Controller extends to Multimedia with its themes. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Computer hardware, Reel and Arithmetic.

His Symbol research incorporates a variety of disciplines, including Outcome, Computer vision, Artificial intelligence and Position. His research in Input device intersects with topics in Display device, Computer graphics, Interactive displays and Table.

Best Publications

  • Gaming system having multiple gaming devices that share a multi-outcome display

    Joseph E. Kaminkow;Anthony J. Baerlocher;Zeke Brill;Hans Elias

  • Gaming device having a bonus scheme with multiple selection groups

    Andrea C. Hughs-Baird;Paulina Glavich;Bayard S. Webb;Anthony J. Baerlocher

  • Gaming system having multiple gaming machines which provide bonus awards

    Anthony J. Baerlocher;James A. Vasquez;Tonja M. Peterson;Erick T. Ching

  • Gaming device having value selection bonus

    Joseph E. Kaminkow;Jean M. Brossard;Anthony J. Baerlocher;Joseph R. Hedrick

  • Server based gaming system having multiple progressive awards

    James A. Vasquez;Anthony J. Baerlocher;Aaron T. Jones;Mark W. Bansemer

  • Gaming device having separately changeable value and modifier bonus scheme

    Anthony J. Baerlocher;Peter Gerrard

  • Gaming device having improved award offer bonus scheme

    Anthony J. Baerlocher;Joseph E. Kaminkow;Gregg J. Palmer

  • Gaming device having different sets of primary and secondary reel symbols

    Paulina Glavich;Anthony J. Baerlocher

  • Gaming device having a primary game scheme involving a symbol generator and secondary award triggering games

    Bayard S. Webb;Anthony J. Baerlocher

  • Gaming device having an indicator selection with probability-based outcome

    Anthony J. Baerlocher;Cari L. Blomquist;Lance R. Peterson

  • Method of operating a progressive gaming device

    Anthony J. Baerlocher;Paulina Glavich

  • Gaming device having independent reels in a circular arrangement

    Anthony J. Baerlocher;Bayard S. Webb

  • Gaming device having a competition bonus scheme

    Anthony J. Baerlocher;Bayard S. Webb;Joseph R. Hedrick

  • Gaming device with traveling reel symbols

    Anthony J. Baerlocher;Cari L. Blomquist;Joseph E. Kaminkow;Lance R. Peterson

  • Gaming device having an accumulated award selection bonus scheme

    Joseph E. Kaminkow;Anthony J. Baerlocher

  • Server based gaming system having system triggered loyalty award sequences

    Cara L. Iddings;Anthony J. Baerlocher;Richard J. Schneider

  • Gaming device having an award exchange bonus round and method for revealing award exchange possibilities

    Bayard Webb;Anthony Baerlocher;Jean Brossard;Joseph Kaminkow

  • Gaming device having an offer and acceptance game with a termination limit wherein the offer is picked by a player

    Anthony J. Baerlocher;Bayard S. Webb

  • Gaming device having an adjacent selection bonus scheme

    Randy W Cuddy;Anthony J Baerlocher;Joseph E Kaminkow;Cari L Blomquist

  • Server based gaming system and method for selectively providing one or more different tournaments

    Greg Schlottmann;Jacob Thomas Graham;Anthony J. Baerlocher;Richard J. Schneider

Frequent Co-Authors

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology opens doors to various dynamic career paths. Today, many students and professionals are seeking flexible study options that fit their schedules and budgets. For those interested in combining tech skills with leadership, an mba online no gmat is an ideal choice. These programs eliminate testing barriers while allowing you to advance your career.

Affordability is another key consideration. Earning an mba under 35k lets you achieve your goals without overwhelming student debt, giving you more financial freedom to pursue your ambitions.

The rise of digital platforms has also driven demand for marketing professionals skilled in social media. If this area interests you, a bachelors in social media marketing provides the up-to-date expertise that employers want in a fast-evolving field.

Additionally, the global hospitality industry seeks tech-savvy graduates. Earning a hospitality degree online equips you with business and management skills valuable in tourism, hotels, and event management. Exploring these online programs can help you diversify your skill set and broaden your professional horizons in engineering, technology, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony J. Baerlocher

Recently Published Articles