World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 45 2851 2590 192 178 128 9474

Malik Alawi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Malik Alawi between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Malik Alawi published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 13.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2022. 37 of the 208 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2022. 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 25 publications
2011 2025

208 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Malik Alawi: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 1
2012 0
2013 4
2014 6
2015 14
2016 23
2017 18
2018 12
2019 12
2020 23
2021 9
2022 25
2023 24
2024 12
2025 25
Total 208
Download as CSV

Malik Alawi publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malik Alawi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–136 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 128 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158 128
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Malik Alawi D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malik Alawi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115 45
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Malik Alawi is affiliated with the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany. Their research focuses extensively on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions also in subfields such as Molecular Biology, Genetics, Immunology, Cancer Research, and Oncology.

The scientist has contributed to a broad range of topics that include:

  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • RNA modifications and cancer

Malik Alawi has published research in various respected journals and venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Nature Communications (12 publications)
  • Nature Genetics (8 publications)
  • Neuro-Oncology (8 publications)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (6 publications)
  • Nature (5 publications)

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Malik Alawi include:

  • The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer, 2020, Nature
  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes, 2020, Nature
  • Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing, 2020, Nature Genetics
  • Comprehensive molecular characterization of mitochondrial genomes in human cancers, 2020, Nature Genetics
  • The landscape of viral associations in human cancers, 2020, Nature Genetics

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Kadir C. Akdemir (29 joint publications)
  • David J. Adams (26 joint publications)
  • Ludmil B. Alexandrov (25 joint publications)
  • Fátima Al-Shahrour (25 joint publications)
  • Eva G. Álvarez (23 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • The landscape of viral associations in human cancers.

    Marc Zapatka;Ivan Borozan;Daniel S Brewer;Daniel S Brewer;Murat Iskar

  • Mutations in KCNH1 and ATP6V1B2 cause Zimmermann-Laband syndrome

    Fanny Kortüm;Viviana Caputo;Christiane K Bauer;Lorenzo Stella

  • Bromodomain Protein BRD4 Is Required for Estrogen Receptor-Dependent Enhancer Activation and Gene Transcription

    Sankari Nagarajan;Tareq Hossan;Malik Alawi;Zeynab Najafova;Zeynab Najafova

  • Presence of atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV) genomes in newborn piglets correlates with congenital tremor

    Alexander Postel;Florian Hansmann;Christine Baechlein;Nicole Fischer

  • Deep metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses of microbial communities affiliated with an industrial biogas fermenter, a cow rumen, and elephant feces reveal major differences in carbohydrate hydrolysis strategies

    Simon Güllert;Martin A. Fischer;Dmitrij Turaev;Britta Noebauer

  • Metagenome Survey of a Multispecies and Alga-Associated Biofilm Revealed Key Elements of Bacterial-Algal Interactions in Photobioreactors

    Ines Krohn-Molt;Bernd Wemheuer;Malik Alawi;Malik Alawi;Anja Poehlein

  • Dual Roles of the Transcription Factor Grainyhead-like 2 (GRHL2) in Breast Cancer

    Stefan Werner;Sabrina Frey;Sabine Riethdorf;Christian Schulze

  • Identification of a Novel Hepacivirus in Domestic Cattle from Germany

    Christine Baechlein;Nicole Fischer;Adam Grundhoff;Malik Alawi;Malik Alawi

  • Indication of Horizontal DNA Gene Transfer by Extracellular Vesicles.

    Stefanie Fischer;Kerstin Cornils;Thomas Speiseder;Anita Badbaran

  • Evaluation of Unbiased Next-Generation Sequencing of RNA (RNA-seq) as a Diagnostic Method in Influenza Virus-Positive Respiratory Samples

    Nicole Fischer;Daniela Indenbirken;Thomas Meyer;Marc Lütgehetmann

  • Monitoring multiple myeloma by next-generation sequencing of V(D)J rearrangements from circulating myeloma cells and cell-free myeloma DNA.

    Anna Oberle;Anna Brandt;Minna Voigtlaender;Benjamin Thiele

  • The SIRPα-CD47 immune checkpoint in NK cells

    Tobias Deuse;Xiaomeng Hu;Sean Agbor-Enoh;Moon K. Jang

  • Insights into Microalga and Bacteria Interactions of Selected Phycosphere Biofilms Using Metagenomic, Transcriptomic, and Proteomic Approaches.

    Ines Krohn-Molt;Malik Alawi;Konrad Ulrich Förstner;Alena Wiegandt

  • Essential control of early B-cell development by Mef2 transcription factors.

    Julia Herglotz;Ludmilla Unrau;Friderike Hauschildt;Meike Fischer

  • A Comparative Metagenome Survey of the Fecal Microbiota of a Breast- and a Plant-Fed Asian Elephant Reveals an Unexpectedly High Diversity of Glycoside Hydrolase Family Enzymes

    Nele Ilmberger;Simon Güllert;Joana Dannenberg;Ulrich Rabausch

  • De novo mutations in mitochondrial DNA of iPSCs produce immunogenic neoepitopes in mice and humans

    Tobias Deuse;Xiaomeng Hu;Sean Agbor-Enoh;Martina Koch

  • Comparative study of whole genome amplification and next generation sequencing performance of single cancer cells.

    Anna Babayan;Malik Alawi;Malik Alawi;Michael Gormley;Volkmar Müller

  • Mutations in NDUFB11, Encoding a Complex I Component of the Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain, Cause Microphthalmia with Linear Skin Defects Syndrome

    Vanessa A. van Rahden;Erika Fernandez-Vizarra;Malik Alawi;Malik Alawi;Kristina Brand

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam Grundhoff
Adam Grundhoff Heinrich-Pette-Institute
Wolfgang R. Streit
Wolfgang R. Streit Universität Hamburg
Paul Becher
Paul Becher University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Nicolaus Kröger
Nicolaus Kröger Universität Hamburg
Roland Eils
Roland Eils Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Boris Fehse
Boris Fehse Universität Hamburg
Manfred Westphal
Manfred Westphal Universität Hamburg
David Wang
David Wang Washington University in St. Louis
Martin Aepfelbacher
Martin Aepfelbacher Universität Hamburg
Rolf Daniel
Rolf Daniel University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology opens the door to a broad range of career paths and further academic opportunities. Students interested in diverse fields may consider expanding their expertise through related online degrees. For those drawn to research and analytical work, a masters in history offers strong research skills and historical context that can complement scientific knowledge.

Aspiring professionals in information management may find value in the cheapest library science degree online, which equips graduates for roles in scientific libraries and archives.

There are also specialized healthcare paths available. For those interested in communication sciences, exploring asha accredited slpa programs can lead to rewarding positions assisting licensed speech-language pathologists.

Additionally, non-SLP majors looking to enter communication sciences can benefit from speech language pathology bridge programs online.

Exploring these interdisciplinary options allows Molecular Biology students to tailor their education and align their studies with diverse professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Malik Alawi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles