World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
33650
World Ranking
14438
National Ranking
7303

Louise C. Strong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise C. Strong sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 238 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Louise C. Strong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise C. Strong sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Louise C. Strong is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medical and biochemical topics, with significant contributions in oncology and molecular biology. Their work intersects cancer research, particularly in molecular pathways, genetic factors, and diagnostics.

Their recent publications cover topics such as hereditary cancer syndromes, cancer epidemiology, and secondary cancer screening outcomes. Notable papers include:

  • Li-Fraumeni Exploration Consortium Data Coordinating Center: Building an Interactive Web-Based Resource for Collaborative International Cancer Epidemiology Research for a Rare Condition, 2020, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • A pedigree-based prediction model identifies carriers of deleterious de novo mutations in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, 2020, Genome Research
  • A pedigree-based prediction model identifies carriers of deleterious de novo mutations in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Abstract PS8-04: Clinical and pathological characteristics and screening outcome for secondary cancers in breast cancer patients with li-fraumeni syndrome attending the MD anderson li-fraumeni education and early detection program clinic, 2021, Cancer Research
  • Cancer mortality in relatives of desmoid sarcoma patients, 2023, Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia

Their work covers several main fields of study:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Subfields relevant to their research include:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Key topics covered in their research are:

  • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Soft tissue tumor case studies

Frequent collaborators in their research include L. Phuong, Jasmina Bojadzieva, Kim E. Nichols, Judy E. Garber, and Constance A. Griffin. These coauthors have contributed to multiple projects, often exploring hereditary cancer syndromes and genomics.

Their findings have been disseminated across various publication venues, notably:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Genome Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research

Best Publications

  • Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms

    David Malkin;Frederick P. Li;Frederick P. Li;Louise C. Strong;Joseph F. Fraumeni

  • Expression of recessive alleles by chromosomal mechanisms in retinoblastoma

    W. K. Cavenee;W. K. Cavenee;T. P. Dryja;R. A. Phillips;William F Benedict

  • A single nucleotide polymorphism in the MDM2 promoter attenuates the p53 tumor suppressor pathway and accelerates tumor formation in humans.

    Gareth L. Bond;Wenwei Hu;Elisabeth E. Bond;Harlan Robins

  • Wild-type p53 restores cell cycle control and inhibits gene amplification in cells with mutant p53 alleles

    Yuxin Yin;Michael A. Tainsky;Farideh Z. Bischoff;Louise C. Strong

  • Gain of Function of a p53 Hot Spot Mutation in a Mouse Model of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome

    Gene A. Lang;Tomoo Iwakuma;Young Ah Suh;Geng Liu

  • Mutation and Cancer: A Model for Wilms' Tumor of the Kidney

    Alfred G. Knudson;Alfred G. Knudson;Louise C. Strong

  • Bone sarcomas linked to radiotherapy and chemotherapy in children.

    MA Tucker;GJ D'Angio;Jr Jd Boice;LC Strong

  • Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a multi-institutional collaborative project.

    Leslie L. Robison;Ann C. Mertens;John D. Boice;Norman E. Breslow

  • The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: A National Cancer Institute–Supported Resource for Outcome and Intervention Research

    Leslie L. Robison;Gregory T. Armstrong;John D. Boice;Eric J. Chow

  • Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk.

    T S Frank;S A Manley;O I Olopade;S Cummings

  • Effects of treatment on fertility in long-term survivors of childhood or adolescent cancer.

    Byrne J;Mulvihill Jj;Myers Mh;Connelly Rr

  • Germline mutations of the p53 tumor-suppressor gene in children and young adults with second malignant neoplasms.

    David Malkin;Stephen H. Friend;Frederick P. Li;Louise C. Strong

  • Mutation and cancer: neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma.

    A. G. Knudson;Louise C Strong

  • Cancer Screening Recommendations for Individuals with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome

    Christian P. Kratz;Maria Isabel Achatz;Laurence Brugieres;Thierry Frebourg

  • Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in a Large United States Sample

    Sining Chen;Edwin S. Iversen;Tara Friebel;Dianne Finkelstein

  • Cancer Survivorship—Genetic Susceptibility and Second Primary Cancers: Research Strategies and Recommendations

    Lois B. Travis;Charles S. Rabkin;Linda Morris Brown;James M. Allan

  • Familial renal cell carcinoma with a 3 ; 11 chromosome translocation limited to tumor cells

    S. Pathak;Louise C Strong;R. E. Ferrell;A. Trindade

  • Spontaneous Abnormalities in Normal Fibroblasts from Patients with Li-Fraumeni Cancer Syndrome: Aneuploidy and Immortalization

    Farideh Z. Bischoff;Sun O. Yim;Sen Pathak;Grace Grant

  • Genetic Disease in Offspring of Long-Term Survivors of Childhood and Adolescent Cancer

    Julianne Byrne;Julianne Byrne;Sonja A. Rasmussen;Sandra C. Steinhorn;Roger R. Connelly

  • Germline p53 Mutations in a Cohort with Childhood Sarcoma: Sex Differences in Cancer Risk

    Shih Jen Hwang;Guillermina Lozano;Christopher I. Amos;Louise C. Strong

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher I. Amos
Christopher I. Amos Baylor College of Medicine
Vicki Huff
Vicki Huff The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Leslie L. Robison
Leslie L. Robison St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Grady F. Saunders
Grady F. Saunders The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Judy Garber
Judy Garber Harvard University
Smita Bhatia
Smita Bhatia University of Alabama at Birmingham
Guillermina Lozano
Guillermina Lozano The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Sharon A. Savage
Sharon A. Savage National Institutes of Health
Banu Arun
Banu Arun The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Frederick P. Li
Frederick P. Li Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but are seeking flexible study options, several online degrees can help you enter or advance in the healthcare sector. These programs offer convenient, affordable pathways without the need to relocate or disrupt your current work-life balance.

For those interested in specialized roles, online pharmacy programs can prepare students for advanced practice in pharmaceutical sciences and patient care. If you prefer a focus on healthcare data, him programs teach the skills needed to manage medical information systems and support hospital administration.

Meanwhile, those seeking quick entry into the workforce might consider billing and coding classes online. These short-term courses can lead to certification and essential roles supporting medical offices and hospitals. Additionally, the need for primary care providers is rising, making affordable online fnp programs an attractive choice for registered nurses looking to expand their scope of practice and increase earning potential.

Each of these pathways offers unique career opportunities and can complement or provide alternatives to a traditional medical degree in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Louise C. Strong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles