World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
9744
World Ranking
6313
National Ranking
2280

Lamont R. Poole publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lamont R. Poole sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 141 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Lamont R. Poole D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lamont R. Poole sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lamont R. Poole is a researcher affiliated with the Langley Research Center in the United States. Their work primarily falls within the domain of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with an emphasis on atmospheric phenomena and related fields.

Their research extensively covers several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, and Global and Planetary Change. The main topics addressed in their publications are Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Dynamics, and Atmospheric Aerosols and Clouds.

Poole has contributed to scientific literature through papers published in notable venues such as Reviews of Geophysics and Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Two recent papers demonstrate the focus of their research:

  • "Polar Stratospheric Clouds: Satellite Observations, Processes, and Role in Ozone Depletion", 2021, Reviews of Geophysics
  • "Quasi-coincident observations of polar stratospheric clouds by ground-based lidar and CALIOP at Concordia (Dome C, Antarctica) from 2014 to 2018", 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

These publications underline Poole's involvement in studying polar stratospheric clouds and their implications for atmospheric ozone processes and climate interactions.

The scientist collaborates regularly with a group of coauthors, which includes:

  • M. C. Pitts
  • Francesco Cairo
  • Marcel Snels
  • Ines Tritscher
  • Simon P. Alexander

These collaborative relationships indicate a network of researchers focused on related atmospheric and geophysical topics. Poole's frequent publication venues reflect a concentration in journals dedicated to atmospheric chemistry, physics, and geophysical reviews.

While the data does not indicate awards or book publications, Poole's scholarly output shows an active engagement with topics relevant to atmospheric ozone depletion and climate, as well as aerosol and cloud chemistry in the Earth's atmosphere.

Best Publications

  • THE CALIPSO MISSION: A Global 3D View of Aerosols and Clouds

    D. M. Winker;Jacques Pelon;J. A. Coakley;S. A. Ackerman

  • Unprecedented Arctic ozone loss in 2011

    Gloria L. Manney;Gloria L. Manney;Michelle L. Santee;Markus Rex;Nathaniel J. Livesey

  • The role of aerosol variations in anthropogenic ozone depletion at northern midlatitudes

    S. Solomon;R. W. Portmann;R. R. Garcia;L. W. Thomason

  • The CALIPSO Version 4 Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm

    Man-Hae Kim;Ali H. Omar;Jason L. Tackett;Mark A. Vaughan

  • A global climatology of stratospheric aerosol surface area density deduced from Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II measurements: 1984–1994

    L. W. Thomason;L. R. Poole;T. Deshler

  • In situ measurements of total reactive nitrogen, total water, and aerosol in a polar stratospheric cloud in the Antarctic

    D. W. Fahey;K. K. Kelly;G. V. Ferry;L. R. Poole

  • Heterogeneous chlorine chemistry in the tropopause region

    S. Solomon;S. Borrmann;R. R. Garcia;R. Portmann

  • Role of aerosol variations in anthropogenic ozone depletion in the polar regions

    R. W. Portmann;S. Solomon;R. R. Garcia;L. W. Thomason

  • CALIPSO polar stratospheric cloud observations: second-generation detection algorithm and composition discrimination

    M. C. Pitts;L. R. Poole;L. W. Thomason

  • Use of probability distribution functions for discriminating between cloud and aerosol in lidar backscatter data

    Zhaoyan Liu;Mark A. Vaughan;David M. Winker;Chris A. Hostetler

  • Polar stratospheric cloud climatology based on Stratospheric Aerosol Measurement II observations from 1978 to 1989

    Lamont R. Poole;Michael C. Pitts

  • Polar stratospheric clouds and the Antarctic ozone hole

    Lamont R. Poole;M. Patrick McCormick

  • The potential for ozone depletion in the arctic polar stratosphere.

    W. H. Brune;J. G. Anderson;D. W. Toohey;D. W. Fahey

  • The 2009–2010 Arctic polar stratospheric cloud season: a CALIPSO perspective

    M. C. Pitts;L. R. Poole;A. Dörnbrack;L. W. Thomason

  • Comparison of reflectance with backscatter and absorption parameters for turbid waters.

    Charles H. Whitlock;Lamont R. Poole;J. W. Usry;W. M. Houghton

  • Airborne lidar observations of Arctic polar stratospheric clouds: Indications of two distinct growth stages

    Lamont R. Poole;M. Patrick McCormick

  • The 1995 scientific assessment of the atmospheric effects of stratospheric aircraft

    Richard S. Stolarski;Steven L. Baughcum;William H. Brune;Anne R. Douglass

  • Ozone depletion at mid‐latitudes: Coupling of volcanic aerosols and temperature variability to anthropogenic chlorine

    S. Solomon;R. W. Portmann;R. R. Garcia;W. Randel

  • Semianalytic Monte Carlo radiative transfer model for oceanographic lidar systems

    Lamont R. Poole;Demetrius D. Venable;Janet W. Campbell

  • Polar Stratospheric Clouds: Satellite Observations, Processes, and Role in Ozone Depletion

    Ines Tritscher;Michael C. Pitts;Lamont R. Poole;Simon P. Alexander

  • An overview of the SOLVE/THESEO 2000 campaign

    Paul A. Newman;Neil R. P. Harris;Alberto Adriani;Georgios T. Amanatidis

  • Characterization of Polar Stratospheric Clouds with spaceborne lidar: CALIPSO and the 2006 Antarctic season

    Michael C. Pitts;L. W. Thomason;Lamont R. Poole;David M. Winker

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael C. Pitts
Michael C. Pitts Langley Research Center
Larry W. Thomason
Larry W. Thomason Langley Research Center
David M. Winker
David M. Winker Langley Research Center
M. P. McCormick
M. P. McCormick Langley Research Center
Chris A. Hostetler
Chris A. Hostetler Langley Research Center
Thomas Peter
Thomas Peter ETH Zurich
Jens-Uwe Grooß
Jens-Uwe Grooß Forschungszentrum Jülich
Hermann Oelhaf
Hermann Oelhaf Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
David W. Fahey
David W. Fahey National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Andreas Dörnbrack
Andreas Dörnbrack German Aerospace Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interconnected fields and career pathways. For those interested in the Earth's physical processes, pursuing an online geoscience degree offers specialized knowledge in geology, helping students understand critical environmental issues like natural resource management and climate change.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which plays a vital role in environmental data analysis and decision-making. The best GIS graduate programs provide essential skills for mapping and spatial analysis that support sustainable development and environmental planning.

Environmental professionals also benefit from leadership and policy-oriented training. A one year MPA can enhance expertise in public administration, enabling graduates to influence environmental regulations and manage public resources effectively.

Finally, integrating social dimensions is crucial. A sociology bachelor degree online equips students with an understanding of human-environment interactions, community impacts, and social justice issues linked to environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Lamont R. Poole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles