World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
35
Citations
13797
World Ranking
2132
National Ranking
860

John E. Swan publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Swan sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 90 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

John E. Swan D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Swan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

John E. Swan is affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their professional work is associated with this institution, where they conduct their academic and research activities.

There are no records available regarding specific recent papers authored by John E. Swan. Consequently, there is no detailed information on individual publications, including titles, years of publication, or venues.

No data on frequent co-authors or collaboration networks has been recorded for John E. Swan. This implies either a lack of publicly available information or a pattern of individual research contributions without regularly recurring collaborators.

Information on frequent publication venues where John E. Swan might have disseminated research findings is also not provided. Therefore, there is no list of journals, conferences, or other academic outlets linked with their work.

No data is available regarding book publications, including publishers or titles connected to their authorship.

The main fields and subfields of study related to John E. Swan's research activities have not been specified. Similarly, there are no listed main topics of work that define their academic focus or research themes.

There are no recorded awards or recognitions granted to John E. Swan, based on accessible information.

The scientist is currently living, as indicated by the data. This status suggests ongoing potential for future academic contributions within their affiliated institution.

Best Publications

  • Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: A field survey approach.

    Richard L. Oliver;John E. Swan

  • SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review of service quality

    Patrick Asubonteng;Karl J. McCleary;John E. Swan

  • Equity and Disconfirmation Perceptions as Influences on Merchant and Product Satisfaction

    Richard L. Oliver;John E. Swan

  • Product Performance and Consumer Satisfaction: A New Concept

    John E. Swan;Linda Jones Combs

  • Product Performance and Consumer Satisfaction: A New Concept

    Unknown

  • Postpurchase communications by consumers

    John E. Swan;Richard L. Oliver

  • Disconfirmation of expectations and satisfaction with a retail service.

    John E. Swan;I. Frederick Trawick

  • Customer Trust in the Salesperson

    John E Swan;Michael R Bowers;Lynne D Richardson

  • How industrial salespeople gain customer trust

    John E. Swan;I.Fredrick Trawick;David W. Silva

  • Product life cycle research: A literature review

    David R. Rink;John E. Swan

  • What attributes determine quality and satisfaction with health care delivery

    Michael R. Bowers;John E. Swan;William F. Koehler

  • Consumer Perceptions of Interpersonal Equity and Satisfaction in Transactions: A Field Survey Approach

    Unknown

  • Trust Earning Perceptions of Sellers and Buyers

    Jon M. Hawes;Kenneth E. Mast;John E. Swan

  • Measuring Dimensions of Purchaser Trust of Industrial Salespeople

    John E. Swan;I. Fred Trawick;David R. Rink;Jenny J. Roberts

  • Gaining Customer Trust: A Conceptual Guide for the Salesperson

    John E. Swan;Johannah Jones Nolan

  • Do appealing hospital rooms increase patient evaluations of physicians, nurses, and hospital services?

    John E. Swan;Lynne D. Richardson;James D. Hutton

  • Industrial Buyer Image of the Saleswoman

    John E. Swan;David R. Rink;G. E. Kiser;Warren S. Martin

  • Strategic Marketing Planning by Product Managers—Room for Improvement?:

    Thomas J. Cossé;John E. Swan

  • SAME JOB - DIFFERENT VIEWS: Women and Men in Induslrial Sales

    John E. Swan;Charles M. Futrell;John T. Todd

  • Services quality and satisfaction

    John E. Swan;Michael R. Bowers

  • A model of industrial satisfaction/complaining behavior

    I.Fredrick Trawick;John E. Swan

  • Customer Identities: Customers as Commercial Friends, Customer Coworkers or Business Acquaintances

    John E. Swan;Cathy Goodwin;Michael A. Mayo;Lynne D. Richardson

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard L. Oliver
Richard L. Oliver Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies in the USA opens the door to a range of online degree options. For those interested in project management within the building industry, online classes for construction management offer flexible schedules and practical knowledge tailored for the construction field.

If you are aiming for leadership roles, top online executive mba programs provide a path for working professionals to advance into executive positions, often while continuing their careers.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Options like the cheapest online graduate programs can help minimize student debt without sacrificing quality.

Additionally, expertise in data analysis is increasingly valued across all management sectors. Consider enrolling in data science programs online to strengthen your quantitative and analytical skills, paving the way for dynamic career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing John E. Swan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles