World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dries P. J. Kuijper

Dries P. J. Kuijper

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
35
Citations
4146
World Ranking
7429
National Ranking
26

Dries P. J. Kuijper publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dries P. J. Kuijper sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 69 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Dries P. J. Kuijper D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dries P. J. Kuijper sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dries P. J. Kuijper is affiliated with the Mammal Research Institute in Poland and works primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their research emphasizes various aspects of ecology, wildlife behavior, and conservation biology.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science

They explore numerous subfields, most notably:

  • Ecology
  • Small Animals
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Key research topics addressed in their publications encompass:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Marcin Churski
  • Joris P. G. M. Cromsigt
  • Jakub W. Bubnicki
  • Tom A. Diserens
  • Marco Heurich

Dries P. J. Kuijper has contributed to a variety of academic journals, with multiple publications in these venues:

  • Global Ecology and Conservation
  • Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Biological Conservation
  • Forest Ecology and Management

Notable recent papers include:

  • Disease-Induced Mortality Outweighs Hunting in Causing Wild Boar Population Crash After African Swine Fever Outbreak, 2020, Frontiers in Veterinary Science
  • Fossoriality in a risky landscape: badger sett use varies with perceived wolf risk, 2020, Journal of Zoology
  • Ecology versus society: Impacts of bark beetle infestations on biodiversity and restorativeness in protected areas of Central Europe, 2021, Biological Conservation
  • Playbacks of predator vocalizations reduce crop damage by ungulates, 2022, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
  • Olfactory cues of large carnivores modify red deer behavior and browsing intensity, 2021, Behavioral Ecology

Best Publications

  • Paws without claws? Ecological effects of large carnivores in anthropogenic landscapes

    D. P. J. Kuijper;E. Sahlén;Bodil Elmhagen;S. Chamaillé-Jammes

  • Hunting for fear: innovating management of human–wildlife conflicts

    Joris P.G.M. Cromsigt;Joris P.G.M. Cromsigt;Joris P.G.M. Cromsigt;Dries P.J. Kuijper;Marius Adam;Robert L. Beschta

  • Landscape of fear in Europe: wolves affect spatial patterns of ungulate browsing in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland.

    D.P.J. Kuijper;C. de Kleine;M. Churski;W.F. van Hooft

  • Do ungulates preferentially feed in forest gaps in European temperate forest

    D.P.J. Kuijper;J.P.G.M. Cromsigt;M. Churski;B. Adam

  • Bottom-up versus top-down control of tree regeneration in the Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland

    Dries P. J. Kuijper;Joris P. G. M. Cromsigt;Joris P. G. M. Cromsigt;Bogumiła Jędrzejewska;Stanisław Miścicki

  • What cues do ungulates use to assess predation risk in dense temperate forests

    Dries P. J. Kuijper;Mart Verwijmeren;Marcin Churski;Adam Zbyryt

  • Fluctuating ungulate density shapes tree recruitment in natural stands of the BiałOwieża Primeval Forest, Poland.

    Dries P.J. Kuijper;Bogumiła Jędrzejewska;Bogdan Brzeziecki;Marcin Churski

  • Do wild ungulates experience higher stress with humans than with large carnivores

    Adam Zbyryt;Jakub W Bubnicki;Dries P J Kuijper;Martin Dehnhard

  • Context dependence of risk effects: wolves and tree logs create patches of fear in an old-growth forest

    Dries P.J. Kuijper;Jakub W. Bubnicki;Marcin Churski;Bjorn Mols;Bjorn Mols

  • Spring feeding by pink-footed geese reduces carbon stocks and sink strength in tundra ecosystems

    Rene Van Der Wal;Sofie Sjogersten;Sarah Jane Woodin;Elisabeth J. Cooper

  • Decline and potential recovery of the European grey partridge (Perdix perdix) population—a review

    Dries Pieter Jan Kuijper;Ernst Oosterveld;Eddy Wymenga

  • Behavioural responses of ungulates to indirect cues of an ambush predator

    Camilla Wikenros;Camilla Wikenros;Dries P.J. Kuijper;Robert Behnke;Krzysztof Schmidt

  • Lack of natural control mechanisms increases wildlife-forestry conflict in managed temperate European forest systems

    D. P. J. Kuijper

  • Revisiting the browsing lawn concept: Evolutionary Interactions or pruning herbivores?

    Joris P.G.M. Cromsigt;Dries P.J. Kuijper

  • A “death trap” in the landscape of fear

    Krzysztof Schmidt;Dries P. J. Kuijper

  • Keep the wolf from the door : How to conserve wolves in Europe's human-dominated landscapes?

    D.P.J. Kuijper;M. Churski;Arie Trouwborst;M. Heurich

  • TOP-DOWN CONTROL OF SMALL HERBIVORES ON SALT-MARSH VEGETATION ALONG A PRODUCTIVITY GRADIENT

    D. P J. Kuijper;J. P. Bakker

  • Is the impact of loggings in the last primeval lowland forest in Europe underestimated? The conservation issues of Białowieża Forest

    Grzegorz Mikusiński;Jakub Witold Bubnicki;Marcin Churski;Dorota Czeszczewik

  • Brown world forests: increased ungulate browsing keeps temperate trees in recruitment bottlenecks in resource hotspots

    Marcin Churski;Jakub W. Bubnicki;Bogumiła Jędrzejewska;Dries P. J. Kuijper

  • trapper: an open source web-based application to manage camera trapping projects

    Jakub W. Bubnicki;Marcin Churski;Dries P. J. Kuijper

  • Herbivory and competition slow down invasion of a tall grass along a productivity gradient

    D. P. J. Kuijper;D. J. Nijhoff;J. P. Bakker

Frequent Co-Authors

Joris P. G. M. Cromsigt
Joris P. G. M. Cromsigt Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Bogumiła Jędrzejewska
Bogumiła Jędrzejewska Mammal Research Institute
Krzysztof Schmidt
Krzysztof Schmidt Polish Academy of Sciences
Marco Heurich
Marco Heurich University of Freiburg
Jan P. Bakker
Jan P. Bakker University of Groningen
Sofie Sjögersten
Sofie Sjögersten University of Nottingham
Sarah J. Woodin
Sarah J. Woodin University of Aberdeen
Graham I. H. Kerley
Graham I. H. Kerley Nelson Mandela University
Jan Bakker
Jan Bakker New York University
Włodzimierz Jędrzejewski
Włodzimierz Jędrzejewski Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution can open the door to a range of professions in research, academia, conservation, and environmental management. For those interested in healthcare and the biological sciences, there are numerous rn to np bridge programs available, offering a pathway from nursing to advanced practice roles with a strong foundation in science and critical thinking.

If you are considering a shift from a non-nursing background into healthcare, several direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online can help you leverage your science experience without starting from scratch. These programs provide accelerated routes to gain advanced nursing credentials and apply your ecological and research knowledge in clinical settings.

Comparing schools and their online degree options is crucial. Resources like capella vs wgu rn to bsn highlight important differences in program length, cost, and learning format, helping you make informed decisions tailored to your interests in biological sciences.

For those aiming to advance through different educational levels, many accredited rn to bsn to msn online programs offer flexible, affordable, and streamlined paths to higher qualifications—empowering you for leadership roles in fields bridging ecology, research, and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Dries P. J. Kuijper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles