World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 49 5378 5153 408 395 119 6020

Sofie Sjögersten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sofie Sjögersten between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sofie Sjögersten published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2023. 18 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2023. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 9 publications
2000 2025

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sofie Sjögersten: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 1
2004 4
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 4
2009 2
2010 1
2011 6
2012 7
2013 5
2014 4
2015 6
2016 4
2017 2
2018 12
2019 8
2020 12
2021 15
2022 10
2023 24
2024 9
2025 9
Total 152
Download as CSV

Sofie Sjögersten publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sofie Sjögersten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 119 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 119
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Sofie Sjögersten D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sofie Sjögersten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273 49
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Sofie Sjögersten is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with prolific contributions in subfields such as Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's work covers major topics including Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics, Fire effects on ecosystems, Climate change and permafrost, Cryospheric studies and observations, Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research.

Recent publications include:

  • Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink, 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • Anthropogenic impacts on lowland tropical peatland biogeochemistry, 2022, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Greenhouse gas emissions resulting from conversion of peat swamp forest to oil palm plantation, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Degradation of Southeast Asian tropical peatlands and integrated strategies for their better management and restoration, 2021, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Short-term impacts of different tillage practices and plant residue retention on soil physical properties and greenhouse gas emissions, 2020, Soil and Tillage Research

Frequent co-authors associated with Sofie Sjögersten include:

  • Nicholas T. Girkin
  • Stephanie Evers
  • Susan Page
  • Doreen S. Boyd
  • Christopher H. Vane

The scientist's research has been published repeatedly in a selection of key venues, with the following standing out by publication count:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Nature
  • Nature Climate Change
  • Wetlands
  • Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink

    J. Loisel;A. V. Gallego-Sala;Matthew J. Amesbury;Matthew J. Amesbury;G. Magnan

  • Tropical wetlands: A missing link in the global carbon cycle?

    Sofie Sjögersten;Colin R. Black;Stephanie Evers;Jorge Hoyos‐Santillan

  • To what extent can zero tillage lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from temperate soils

    Shamsudheen Mangalassery;Sofie Sjögersten;Debbie L. Sparkes;Craig J. Sturrock

  • The effect of soil aggregate size on pore structure and its consequence on emission of greenhouse gases

    Shamsudheen Mangalassery;S. Sjögersten;D.L. Sparkes;C.J. Sturrock

  • Impacts of zero tillage on soil enzyme activities, microbial characteristics and organic matter functional chemistry in temperate soils

    S. Mangalassery;S. Mangalassery;Sacha J. Mooney;D.L. Sparkes;W.T. Fraser

  • Soil organic matter biochemistry and potential susceptibility to climatic change across the forest‐tundra ecotone in the Fennoscandian mountains

    Sofie Sjögersten;Benjamin L. Turner;Nathalie Mahieu;Leo M. Condron

  • Anthropogenic impacts on lowland tropical peatland biogeochemistry

    Unknown

  • Root exudate analogues accelerate CO2 and CH4 production in tropical peat

    N.T. Girkin;B.L. Turner;N. Ostle;J. Craigon

  • Climatic and resource quality controls on soil respiration across a forest–tundra ecotone in Swedish Lapland

    Sofie Sjögersten;Philip A Wookey

  • Impacts of conversion of tropical peat swamp forest to oil palm plantation on peat organic chemistry, physical properties and carbon stocks

    Amanda J. Tonks;Amanda J. Tonks;Paul Aplin;Darren J. Beriro;Hannah Cooper;Hannah Cooper

  • Spring feeding by pink-footed geese reduces carbon stocks and sink strength in tundra ecosystems

    Rene Van Der Wal;Sofie Sjogersten;Sarah Jane Woodin;Elisabeth J. Cooper

  • Consequences of warming on tundra carbon balance determined by reindeer grazing history

    Maria Väisänen;Henni Ylänne;Henni Ylänne;Elina Kaarlejärvi;Sofie Sjögersten

  • Greenhouse gas emissions resulting from conversion of peat swamp forest to oil palm plantation

    Hannah V. Cooper;Stephanie Evers;Stephanie Evers;Paul Aplin;Neil Crout

  • Biogeochemical processes along a nutrient gradient in a tropical ombrotrophic peatland

    Sofie Sjögersten;Alexander W. Cheesman;Omar Lopez;Benjamin L. Turner

  • Contribution of subsurface peat to CO2 and CH4 fluxes in a neotropical peatland

    Emma L. Wright;Colin R. Black;Alexander W. Cheesman;Alexander W. Cheesman;Trevor Drage

  • Small-scale hydrological variation determines landscape CO2 fluxes in the high Arctic

    Sofie Sjögersten;Sofie Sjögersten;René van der Wal;Sarah J. Woodin

  • Hydroclimatic vulnerability of peat carbon in the central Congo Basin

    Unknown

  • Tree diversity and its ecological importance value in organic and conventional cocoa agroforests in Ghana.

    Michael Asigbaase;Sofie Sjogersten;Barry H. Lomax;Evans Dawoe

  • Decomposition of mountain birch leaf litter at the forest-tundra ecotone in the Fennoscandian mountains in relation to climate and soil conditions

    Sofie Sjögersten;Philip A. Wookey

  • Habitat type determines herbivory controls over CO2 fluxes in a warmer Arctic.

    Sofie Sjögersten;René van der Wal;Sarah J. Woodin

  • Long‐term zero‐tillage enhances the protection of soil carbon in tropical agriculture

    Hannah V. Cooper;Sofie Sjögersten;Richard M. Lark;Nicholas T. Girkin

  • Degradation of Southeast Asian tropical peatlands and integrated strategies for their better management and restoration

    Shailendra Mishra;Susan E. Page;Alexander R. Cobb;Janice Ser Huay Lee

  • The impact of climate change on ecosystem carbon dynamics at the Scandinavian mountain birch forest-tundra heath ecotone.

    Sofie Sjögersten;Philip Andrew Wookey

  • Improving estimates of tropical peatland area, carbon storage, and greenhouse gas fluxes

    I. T. Lawson;T. J. Kelly;P. Aplin;A. Boom

  • Spatio-temporal variability and environmental controls of methane fluxes at the forest-tundra ecotone in the Fennoscandian mountains

    Sofie Sjögersten;Philip A. Wookey

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin L. Turner
Benjamin L. Turner Gyeongsang National University
Sarah J. Woodin
Sarah J. Woodin University of Aberdeen
Sacha J. Mooney
Sacha J. Mooney University of Nottingham
René van der Wal
René van der Wal Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Philip A. Wookey
Philip A. Wookey University of Stirling
Christopher H. Vane
Christopher H. Vane British Geological Survey
Nick Ostle
Nick Ostle Lancaster University
Colin R. Black
Colin R. Black University of Nottingham
Karl Ritz
Karl Ritz University of Nottingham
Debbie L. Sparkes
Debbie L. Sparkes University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career options and enhance expertise. Programs like dsw programs offer advanced practice in social work, which often intersects with environmental policy and community health.

Those looking for flexible and budget-friendly options may consider an online general studies bachelor degree cheap. This path allows students to customize their curriculum to include courses focusing on sustainability, environmental ethics, or resource management.

Students new to college-level coursework or returning to education after a break might ask, “what’s the easiest bachelor’s degree to get?” While the answer varies, some general studies and interdisciplinary programs incorporate foundational environmental topics with manageable workloads.

For those committed to specialized scientific roles, pursuing a geologist degree online is a strong option. These programs emphasize earth sciences, fieldwork, and data analysis, preparing graduates for diverse careers in environmental consulting, conservation, or geological research.

Best Scientists Citing Sofie Sjögersten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles