World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joachim Ingwersen

Joachim Ingwersen

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
7112
World Ranking
7100
National Ranking
456

Joachim Ingwersen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Ingwersen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 158 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Joachim Ingwersen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joachim Ingwersen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joachim Ingwersen is affiliated with the University of Hohenheim in Germany. Their research spans multiple domains within environmental and agricultural sciences, with a notable focus on ecosystem processes, plant-soil interactions, and atmospheric modeling related to climate and agriculture.

The scientist has contributed to various subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science, Ecology, Agronomy and Crop Science, and Atmospheric Science. These areas reflect a broad engagement with both terrestrial ecosystem dynamics and climate-related environmental processes.

Main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Subfields of study encompass:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Soil Science
  • Ecology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Atmospheric Science

Their research topics cover several aspects such as Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, Climate Variability and Models, Soil and Unsaturated Flow, Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, and Remote Sensing in Agriculture.

Main topics of work include:

  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture

Joachim Ingwersen has published research in notable venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Agronomy
  • Field Crops Research

Significant papers authored or co-authored by Ingwersen include:

  • Altered energy partitioning across terrestrial ecosystems in the European drought year 2018 (2020), published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Mineral-Ecological Cropping Systems-A New Approach to Improve Ecosystem Services by Farming without Chemical Synthetic Plant Protection (2021), published in Agronomy
  • Land Cover Impacts on Land-Atmosphere Coupling Strength in Climate Simulations With WRF Over Europe (2020), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Contribution of plant-induced pressurized flow to CH4 emission from a Phragmites fen (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • Noah-MP With the Generic Crop Growth Model Gecros in the WRF Model: Effects of Dynamic Crop Growth on Land-Atmosphere Interaction (2022), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

The scientist's collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Thilo Streck, Tobias K. D. Weber, Volker Wulfmeyer, Sebastian Gayler, and Arne Poyda. Their partnerships reflect interdisciplinary approaches combining expertise in climate modeling, ecosystem research, and agricultural sciences.

Best Publications

  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;C. Rosenzweig;J. W. Jones

  • Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one

    Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre;Daniel Wallach;Senthold Asseng;Frank Ewert

  • The effect of mulching and tillage on the water and temperature regimes of a loess soil: Experimental findings and modeling

    Rita Dahiya;Joachim Ingwersen;Thilo Streck

  • Dynamics of litter carbon turnover and microbial abundance in a rye detritusphere

    Christian Poll;Sven Marhan;Joachim Ingwersen;Ellen Kandeler

  • Mechanisms of solute transport affect small‐scale abundance and function of soil microorganisms in the detritusphere

    C. Poll;J. Ingwersen;M. Stemmer;M. H. Gerzabek

  • Microbial uptake of low-molecular-weight organic substances out-competes sorption in soil

    H. Fischer;H. Fischer;J. Ingwersen;Y. Kuzyakov

  • Infiltration from the Pedon to Global Grid Scales: An Overview and Outlook for Land Surface Modeling

    Harry Vereecken;Lutz Weihermüller;Shmuel Assouline;Jirka Šimůnek

  • Barometric Process Separation: New Method for Quantifying Nitrification, Denitrification, and Nitrous Oxide Sources in Soils

    Joachim Ingwersen;Klaus Butterbach-Bahl;Rainer Gasche;Hans Papen

  • Micro-scale modelling of carbon turnover driven by microbial succession at a biogeochemical interface

    Joachim Ingwersen;Christian Poll;Thilo Streck;Ellen Kandeler

  • Phytolith transport in soil: A field study using fluorescent labelling

    Olga Fishkis;Joachim Ingwersen;Marc Lamers;Dmytro Denysenko

  • Comparison of Noah simulations with eddy covariance and soil water measurements at a winter wheat stand

    J. Ingwersen;K. Steffens;P. Högy;K. Warrach-Sagi

  • Gross Nitrogen Transformations and Related Nitrous Oxide Emissions in an Intensively Used Calcareous Soil

    Yunjing Wan;Xiaotang Ju;Joachim Ingwersen;Ulrich Schwarz

  • A New Research Approach for Observing and Characterizing Land-Atmosphere Feedback

    Volker Wulfmeyer;David D. Turner;B. Baker;R. Banta

  • Estimation of heavy metal sorption in German soils using artificial neural networks

    Ihuaku Anagu;Joachim Ingwersen;Jens Utermann;Thilo Streck

  • Investigation of PBL schemes combining the WRF model simulations with scanning water vapor differential absorption lidar measurements

    Josipa Milovac;Kirsten Warrach-Sagi;Andreas Behrendt;Florian Späth

  • A regional-scale study on the crop uptake of cadmium from sandy soils: measurement and modeling.

    Joachim Ingwersen;Thilo Streck

  • Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen pools after shifting from conventional cereal to greenhouse vegetable production

    S.J. Qiu;S.J. Qiu;X.T. Ju;J. Ingwersen;Z.C. Qin

  • Phytolith transport in sandy sediment: Experiments and modeling

    Olga Fishkis;Joachim Ingwersen;Thilo Streck

  • Monitoring and risk assessment of pesticides in a tropical river of an agricultural watershed in northern Thailand.

    W. Sangchan;M. Bannwarth;J. Ingwersen;C. Hugenschmidt

  • Uncertainty, sensitivity and improvements in soil moisture estimation with cosmic-ray neutron sensing

    Gabriele Baroni;Gabriele Baroni;Lena M. Scheiffele;Martin Schrön;Joachim Ingwersen

  • Modelling water dynamics with DNDC and DAISY in a soil of the North China Plain: A comparative study

    Roland Kröbel;Qinping Sun;Joachim Ingwersen;Xinping Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Thilo Streck
Thilo Streck University of Hohenheim
Sebastian Gayler
Sebastian Gayler University of Hohenheim
Petra Högy
Petra Högy University of Hohenheim
Volker Wulfmeyer
Volker Wulfmeyer University of Hohenheim
Nadine Brisson
Nadine Brisson INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Ellen Kandeler
Ellen Kandeler University of Hohenheim
Christian Poll
Christian Poll University of Hohenheim
Pierre Martre
Pierre Martre INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Senthold Asseng
Senthold Asseng Technical University of Munich
Kenneth J. Boote
Kenneth J. Boote University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career options that integrate multiple disciplines. For those interested in Earth's physical processes, exploring the best online geology degree programs can provide foundational knowledge in geoscience and resource management.

With the growing importance of spatial data, learning Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is crucial. The best GIS programs in the US offer specialized training that supports environmental planning, conservation, and disaster response.

Leadership and policy play significant roles in environmental decision-making. Earning a Master of Public Administration in a streamlined format like the one year MPA enables professionals to advance their careers while focusing on sustainability initiatives and public sector management.

Understanding social dynamics is also vital, as environmental challenges often intersect with human behavior. Online programs such as the best online bachelor degree in sociology provide insights into societal impacts and community engagement strategies.

Combining these fields equips students with the skills needed to address complex environmental issues from scientific, technical, administrative, and social perspectives.

Best Scientists Citing Joachim Ingwersen

Trending Scientists