World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 37 1913 1791 784 718 66 11994

Haemoon Oh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Haemoon Oh between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Haemoon Oh published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2004. 5 of the 74 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2004. 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1998 2025

74 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Haemoon Oh: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 3
1999 1
2000 2
2001 3
2002 2
2003 3
2004 7
2005 3
2006 3
2007 2
2008 2
2009 3
2010 3
2011 2
2012 1
2013 1
2014 3
2015 0
2016 5
2017 6
2018 6
2019 1
2020 2
2021 1
2022 2
2023 2
2024 3
2025 2
Total 74
Download as CSV

Haemoon Oh publications per year - data summary

  • Haemoon Oh, a Business and Management scholar from University of South Carolina, has 74 publications recorded across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1998 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2004, with 7 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1999, 2012, 2013, 2019 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 28 years in the span carries no publications at all (2015).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.7 per year counting only the 27 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 10 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1998-2007: 29 publications (2.9 per year); 2008-2017: 26 publications (2.6 per year); 2018-2025: 19 publications (2.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Haemoon Oh publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haemoon Oh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 65–69 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 66 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52 66
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Haemoon Oh publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Haemoon Oh, a Business and Management scholar from University of South Carolina, records 66 publications - the 5th percentile of the discipline.
  • 5% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Haemoon Oh, and about 95% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Haemoon Oh ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Haemoon Oh D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haemoon Oh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111 37
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Haemoon Oh D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Haemoon Oh, a Business and Management scholar from University of South Carolina, records 37 D-Index - the 37th percentile of the discipline.
  • 37% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Haemoon Oh, and about 63% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Haemoon Oh ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Haemoon Oh is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, as well as Social Sciences. Within these broader areas, they have concentrated on subfields including Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Human-Computer Interaction, and Information Systems and Management.

Haemoon Oh's scholarly work covers several main topics, such as:

  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Sharing Economy and Platforms

Their publications have appeared in a variety of academic venues, including multiple articles in the following journals:

  • International Journal of Hospitality Management
  • International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
  • Journal of Travel Research
  • Journal of Product & Brand Management
  • Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Haemoon Oh include:

  • "Global or local brand? Hotel selection in global travel context" (2020), published in Journal of Product & Brand Management
  • "Nonlinear effects of employee engagement and satisfaction on turnover intention" (2022), published in International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management

Additionally, Haemoon Oh has collaborated with various colleagues, with the most frequent coauthors being:

  • Seonjeong Lee
  • Miyoung Jeong
  • Hyejo Hailey Shin
  • Minwoo Lee
  • Kevin Kam Fung So

Best Publications

  • Measuring Experience Economy Concepts: Tourism Applications:

    Haemoon Oh;Ann Marie Fiore;Miyoung Jeoung

  • Service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer value: A holistic perspective

    Haemoon Oh

  • Revisiting importance–performance analysis

    Haemoon Oh

  • The Effect of Brand Class, Brand Awareness, and Price on Customer Value and Behavioral Intentions

    Haemoon Oh

  • Conceptualizing Web site quality and its consequences in the lodging industry

    Miyoung Jeong;Haemoon Oh;Mary Gregoire

  • Motivations and constraints of Airbnb consumers: Findings from a mixed-methods approach

    Kevin Kam Fung So;Haemoon Oh;Somang Min

  • Diners' Perceptions of Quality, Value, and Satisfaction

    Unknown

  • Price fairness and its asymmetric effects on overall price, quality, and value judgments: the case of an upscale hotel.

    Haemoon Oh

  • Customer satisfaction, service quality, and customer value: years 2000-2015

    Unknown

  • Motivations and Goals of Slow Tourism

    Haemoon Oh;A. George Assaf;Seyhmus Baloglu

  • Volitional degrees of gambling behaviors

    Haemoon Oh;Cathy H.C. Hsu

  • A Customer-Based Brand Equity Model for Upscale Hotels

    Cathy Hui-chun Hsu;Haemoon Oh;A. George Assaf

  • Quality function deployment: An extended framework for service quality and customer satisfaction in the hospitality industry

    Miyoung Jeong;Haemoon Oh

  • Tourists' adoption of self-service technologies at resort hotels

    Haemoon Oh;Miyoung Jeong;Seyhmus Baloglu

  • Psychological ownership theory: an exploratory application in the restaurant industry.

    Vahagn S. Asatryan;Haemoon Oh

  • Hospitality and tourism marketing: recent developments in research and future directions

    Haemoon Oh;Byeong-Yong Kim;Jee-Hye Shin

  • Effects of Brand, Price, and Risk on Customers' Value Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions in the Restaurant Industry

    Joon-Wuk Kwun;Haemoon Oh

  • How do hotel firms obtain a competitive advantage

    Byeong Yong Kim;Haemoon Oh

  • Asymmetric relationship between attribute performance and customer satisfaction: A new perspective

    Unknown

  • What Makes Airbnb Experiences Enjoyable? The Effects of Environmental Stimuli on Perceived Enjoyment and Repurchase Intention:

    Kevin Kam Fung So;Hyunsu Kim;Haemoon Oh

  • Age- and gender-based market segmentation: a structural understanding.

    Haemoon Oh;Sara C. Parks;Frederick J. Demicco

  • Customer Satisfaction and Service Quality: A Critical Review of the Literature and Research Implications for the Hospitality Industry:

    Haemoon Oh;Sara C. Parks

  • Transaction Evaluations and Relationship Intentions

    Haemoon Oh

Frequent Co-Authors

Miyoung Jeong
Miyoung Jeong University of South Carolina
Cathy H.C. Hsu
Cathy H.C. Hsu Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Ann Marie Fiore
Ann Marie Fiore Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in the USA opens a wide range of business and management career pathways. In addition to general business programs, many learners are pursuing niche fields such as construction management colleges, which prepare professionals for leadership roles in the growing construction sector.

Those interested in the healthcare industry often find value in earning a health administration degree online, allowing graduates to manage healthcare organizations effectively. These specialized online degrees are designed for busy adults and those seeking to transition into management roles quickly.

For students looking to save time and reduce costs, fast track degree programs can significantly accelerate graduation timelines without compromising quality. Combined with the flexibility and cost savings offered by reputable business schools online, prospective students can find programs that fit their budget and career ambitions.

No matter your interest—whether it’s general business, healthcare, or construction management—online degrees make it easier than ever to upskill and pursue new career opportunities in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Haemoon Oh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles