World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7492 7199 2663 2478 107 5776

Fred L. Moore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fred L. Moore between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fred L. Moore published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2020. 12 of the 168 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2020. 1991: 6 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 5 publications
1991 2026

168 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fred L. Moore: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 6
1992 3
1993 8
1994 1
1995 2
1996 3
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 1
2001 6
2002 7
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 0
2007 0
2008 3
2009 2
2010 3
2011 4
2012 6
2013 8
2014 9
2015 1
2016 6
2017 5
2018 9
2019 4
2020 13
2021 8
2022 7
2023 13
2024 9
2025 7
2026 5
Total 168
Download as CSV

Fred L. Moore publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred L. Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 107 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 107
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Fred L. Moore D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred L. Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Fred L. Moore is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions in Environmental Science. Within these fields, Moore's work extensively covers Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, alongside areas related to Astronomy and Astrophysics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Environmental Engineering.

The main topics of Moore's research include:

  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds

Moore has published extensively in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication platforms include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Science

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Moore include:

  • "The NASA Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Mission: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere," 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Global-scale distribution of ozone in the remote troposphere from the ATom and HIPPO airborne field missions," 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Constraining remote oxidation capacity with ATom observations," 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols, Version 2," 2021, University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)
  • "Pyrocumulonimbus affect average stratospheric aerosol composition," 2023, Science

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Moore has worked with Eric J. Hintsa, Bruce C. Daube, James W. Elkins, Steven C. Wofsy, and Kathryn McKain, reflecting a network of partnerships in atmospheric sciences and related disciplines. The number of co-authored publications ranges, with up to 22 collaborations with Eric J. Hintsa and significant contributions alongside other frequent co-authors.

Best Publications

  • Calibration of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network using aircraft profile data

    Debra Wunch;Geoffrey C. Toon;Paul O. Wennberg;Steven C. Wofsy

  • An unexpected and persistent increase in global emissions of ozone-depleting CFC-11

    Stephen A. Montzka;Geoff S. Dutton;Geoff S. Dutton;Pengfei Yu;Pengfei Yu;Eric Ray;Eric Ray

  • Age of stratospheric air unchanged within uncertainties over the past 30 years

    A. Engel;T. Möbius;H. Bönisch;U. Schmidt

  • Mean Ages of Stratospheric Air Derived from in Situ Observations of Co2, Ch4, and N2o

    A. E. Andrews;K. A. Boering;B. C. Daube;S. C. Wofsy

  • Observational evidence for interhemispheric hydroxyl-radical parity

    P. K. Patra;P. K. Patra;M. C. Krol;S. A. Montzka;T. Arnold

  • Transport into the northern hemisphere lowermost stratosphere revealed by in situ tracer measurements

    Eric A. Ray;Fred L. Moore;James W. Elkins;Geoffrey S. Dutton

  • Atmospheric observations of Arctic Ocean methane emissions up to 82° north

    E. A. Kort;E. A. Kort;Steven C. Wofsy;B. C. Daube;Minghui Diao

  • Global‐scale seasonally resolved black carbon vertical profiles over the Pacific

    J. P. Schwarz;J. P. Schwarz;B. H. Samset;A. E. Perring;A. E. Perring;J. R. Spackman

  • Chemical depletion of Arctic ozone in winter 1999/2000

    M. Rex;R. J. Salawitch;N. R. P. Harris;P. von der Gathen

  • Quantification of the SF6 lifetime based on mesospheric loss measured in the stratospheric polar vortex

    Eric A. Ray;Eric A. Ray;Fred L. Moore;Fred L. Moore;James W. Elkins;Karen H. Rosenlof

  • THE NASA ATMOSPHERIC TOMOGRAPHY (ATom) MISSION: Imaging the Chemistry of the Global Atmosphere

    Chelsea R. Thompson;Steven C. Wofsy;Michael J. Prather;Paul A. Newman

  • ATom: Merged Atmospheric Chemistry, Trace Gases, and Aerosols

    S.C. Wofsy;S. Afshar;H.M. Allen;E.C. Apel

  • Global emissions of refrigerants HCFC-22 and HFC-134a: unforeseen seasonal contributions.

    Bin Xiang;Prabir K. Patra;Stephen A. Montzka;Scot M. Miller

  • Evaluation of the airborne quantum cascade laser spectrometer (QCLS) measurements of the carbon and greenhouse gas suite – CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 O, and CO – during the CalNex and HIPPO campaigns

    G Santoni;Bruce C. Daube;E. A. Kort;R. Jiménez

  • Descent and mixing in the 1999–2000 northern polar vortex inferred from in situ tracer measurements

    Eric A. Ray;Eric A. Ray;Fred L. Moore;Fred L. Moore;James W. Elkins;Dale F. Hurst;Dale F. Hurst

  • Improving stratospheric transport trend analysis based on SF6 and CO2 measurements

    Eric A. Ray;Eric A. Ray;Fred L. Moore;Fred L. Moore;Karen H. Rosenlof;Sean M. Davis;Sean M. Davis

  • Improving measurements of SF 6 for the study of atmospheric transport and emissions

    B. D. Hall;G. S. Dutton;D. J. Mondeel;J. D. Nance

  • Evidence for changes in stratospheric transport and mixing over the past three decades based on multiple data sets and tropical leaky pipe analysis

    Eric A. Ray;Eric A. Ray;Fred L. Moore;Fred L. Moore;Karen H. Rosenlof;Sean M. Davis;Sean M. Davis

  • Evaluating global emission inventories of biogenic bromocarbons

    Ryan Hossaini;Hannah Mantle;Martyn P. Chipperfield;Stephen A. Montzka

  • Tropospheric distribution and variability of N2O: Evidence for strong tropical emissions

    E. A. Kort;P. K. Patra;K. Ishijima;B. C. Daube

  • Atmospheric Acetaldehyde: Importance of Air-Sea Exchange and a Missing Source in the Remote Troposphere

    Siyuan Wang;Rebecca S. Hornbrook;Alan J. Hills;Louisa K. Emmons

  • Estimate of carbonyl sulfide tropical oceanic surface fluxes using Aura Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer observations

    Le Kuai;John R. Worden;J. Elliott Campbell;Susan S. Kulawik

  • Global-scale distribution of ozone in the remote troposphere from the ATom and HIPPO airborne field missions

    Ilann Bourgeois;Ilann Bourgeois;Jeffrey Peischl;Jeffrey Peischl;Chelsea R. Thompson;Chelsea R. Thompson;Kenneth C. Aikin;Kenneth C. Aikin

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric A. Ray
Eric A. Ray National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
James W. Elkins
James W. Elkins National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Dale F. Hurst
Dale F. Hurst Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Eric J. Hintsa
Eric J. Hintsa Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
David J. Wineland
David J. Wineland University of Oregon
Colm Sweeney
Colm Sweeney National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Elliot L Atlas
Elliot L Atlas University of Miami
Stephen A. Montzka
Stephen A. Montzka National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Bruce C. Daube
Bruce C. Daube Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, expanding your educational background through related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. A degree like the best online sociology bachelor degree helps develop a strong understanding of social dynamics and environmental policy, which is crucial for roles in community planning and sustainability initiatives.

Advanced degrees also play a vital role in career advancement. Many professionals seek flexible options, such as online doctoral programs without dissertation, to earn their credentials without the traditional research hurdles. These programs help educators and administrators in environmental fields develop leadership skills without extensive research commitments.

For educators aiming to improve their qualifications, the pathway from eds to edd programs online offers a streamlined approach to doctoral studies. These programs are particularly valuable for advancing practical expertise in environmental education and policy-making.

Finally, exploring affordable options like the cheapest online dsw programs can make advanced social work degrees accessible. Social workers with environmental specialization are increasingly needed to address community health, disaster response, and sustainable development issues.

Best Scientists Citing Fred L. Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles