World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 36 2046 1921 64 62 88 7996

Dominik Mahr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dominik Mahr between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dominik Mahr published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2018. 21 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2018. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications
2007 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dominik Mahr: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 3
2011 5
2012 4
2013 10
2014 7
2015 4
2016 3
2017 7
2018 14
2019 8
2020 9
2021 7
2022 14
2023 6
2024 10
2025 11
Total 123
Download as CSV

Dominik Mahr publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Mahr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 85–89 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 88 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94 88
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Dominik Mahr D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Mahr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114 36
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Dominik Mahr is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research spans interdisciplinary fields primarily within Business, Management and Accounting, and Computer Science. Over their career, they have contributed to 48 publications in the business and management domain and 34 in computer science disciplines.

The scientist's work focuses on various subfields including:

  • Marketing
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Social Psychology

Their main research topics incorporate:

  • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Service and Product Innovation
  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour

Dominik Mahr has authored and co-authored a range of recent papers, several of which have received notable citations. Selected recent works include:

  • "Augmented Reality Marketing: A Technology-Enabled Approach to Situated Customer Experience," 2020, published in Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)
  • "The playground effect: How augmented reality drives creative customer engagement," 2020, published in Journal of Business Research
  • "Mitigating loneliness with companion robots in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: an integrative framework and research agenda," 2020, published in Journal of Service Management
  • "Embracing falsity through the metaverse: The case of synthetic customer experiences," 2022, published in Business Horizons
  • "Leveraging service design for healthcare transformation: toward people-centered, integrated, and technology-enabled healthcare systems," 2020, published in Journal of Service Management

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Jonas Heller (18 joint works)
  • Tim Hilken (16 joint works)
  • Gaby Odekerken-Schröder (13 joint works)
  • Ko de Ruyter (10 joint works)
  • Mathew Chylinski (9 joint works)

Dominik's publications have appeared in various journals with multiple contributions to:

  • Journal of Service Management (8 publications)
  • Journal of Business Research (4 publications)
  • Journal of Service Research (3 publications)
  • Journal of Product Innovation Management (3 publications)
  • Computers in Human Behavior (3 publications)

Best Publications

  • Unraveling the personalization paradox: The effect of information collection and trust-building strategies on online advertisement effectiveness

    Elizabeth Aguirre;Dominik Mahr;Dhruv Grewal;Ko de Ruyter

  • Augmenting the eye of the beholder: exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences

    Tim Hilken;Ko de Ruyter;Mathew Chylinski;Dominik Mahr

  • The Value of Customer Cocreated Knowledge during the Innovation Process

    Dominik Mahr;Annouk Lievens;Vera Blazevic

  • Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders

    Kande Kazadi;Annouk Lievens;Dominik Mahr

  • Virtual lead user communities: Drivers of knowledge creation for innovation

    Dominik Mahr;Annouk Lievens

  • Service robots: value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks

    Martina Čaić;Gaby Odekerken-Schröder;Dominik Mahr

  • Cutting through Content Clutter: How speech and image acts drive consumer sharing of social media brand messages

    Francisco Javier Villarroel Ordenes;Dhruv Grewal;Stephan Ludwig;Ko De Ruyter;Ko De Ruyter

  • The value of social media for innovation: A capability perspective

    Marie-Isabelle Muninger;Wafa Hammedi;Dominik Mahr

  • Let Me Imagine That for You: Transforming the Retail Frontline Through Augmenting Customer Mental Imagery Ability

    Jonas Heller;Mathew Chylinski;Ko de Ruyter;Ko de Ruyter;Dominik Mahr

  • The acceptance of blockchain technology in meat traceability and transparency

    Fabian Sander;Janjaap Semeijn;Dominik Mahr

  • Making omnichannel an augmented reality: the current and future state of the art

    Tim Hilken;Jonas Heller;Mathew Chylinski;Debbie Isobel Keeling

  • Value of social robots in services: social cognition perspective

    Martina Čaić;Dominik Mahr;Gaby Oderkerken-Schröder

  • The playground effect: How augmented reality drives creative customer engagement

    Alexander Jessen;Tim Hilken;Mathew Chylinski;Dominik Mahr

  • Touching the Untouchable: Exploring Multi-Sensory Augmented Reality in the Context of Online Retailing

    Jonas Heller;Jonas Heller;Mathew Chylinski;Ko de Ruyter;Ko de Ruyter;Dominik Mahr;Dominik Mahr

  • Augmented reality marketing: A technology-enabled approach to situated customer experience

    Mathew Chylinski;Jonas Heller;Tim Hilken;Debbie Isobel Keeling

  • Uncovering Collaborative Value Creation Patterns and Establishing Corresponding Customer Roles

    Sabine Moeller;Robert Ciuchita;Dominik Mahr;Gaby Odekerken-Schröder

  • How to strategically choose or combine augmented and virtual reality for improved online experiential retailing

    Tim Hilken;Mathew Chylinski;Debbie Isobel Keeling;Jonas Heller

  • Seeing eye to eye: social augmented reality and shared decision making in the marketplace

    Tim Hilken;Debbie I. Keeling;Ko de Ruyter;Ko de Ruyter;Dominik Mahr

  • Take their word for IT: the symbolic role of linguistic style matches in user communities

    Stephan Ludwig;Ko De Ruyter;Dominik Mahr;Martin Wetzels

Frequent Co-Authors

Gaby Odekerken-Schröder
Gaby Odekerken-Schröder Maastricht University
Ko de Ruyter
Ko de Ruyter King's College London
Martin Wetzels
Martin Wetzels EDHEC Business School
Alexandre Bernardino
Alexandre Bernardino Instituto Superior Técnico
Dhruv Grewal
Dhruv Grewal Babson College
Lieven De Marez
Lieven De Marez Ghent University
Daniel P. Siewiorek
Daniel P. Siewiorek Carnegie Mellon University
Janjaap Semeijn
Janjaap Semeijn Maastricht University
Cristina Mele
Cristina Mele University of Naples Federico II
Aric Rindfleisch
Aric Rindfleisch University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online options for studying Business and Management in the USA opens up a wealth of flexible education and career opportunities. Many students are drawn to cheap online master's programs that offer quality learning without the heavy financial burden of traditional study.

Specializing in data-driven fields is also popular. Pursuing one of the best masters in data science online can set you apart in the job market, equipping you with advanced analytical and technical skills highly sought after by employers.

For those aiming for top leadership roles, affordable doctoral programs in leadership present an excellent pathway to advance your expertise and career prospects in organizational management and executive positions.

It’s essential to select reputable institutions. Choosing from good online colleges ensures your degree is valued and recognized, paving the way for professional success in various business sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Dominik Mahr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles