World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 107 6110 5744 3268 3030 331 64370

Deborah C. Mash publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Deborah C. Mash between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Deborah C. Mash published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2015. 4 of the 344 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2015. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1978 2025

344 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Deborah C. Mash: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 2
1986 4
1987 1
1988 3
1989 2
1990 2
1991 5
1992 8
1993 8
1994 6
1995 13
1996 7
1997 11
1998 8
1999 13
2000 7
2001 6
2002 10
2003 10
2004 6
2005 16
2006 13
2007 16
2008 5
2009 11
2010 3
2011 10
2012 16
2013 15
2014 7
2015 20
2016 9
2017 15
2018 10
2019 10
2020 8
2021 10
2022 5
2023 8
2024 2
2025 2
Total 344
Download as CSV

Deborah C. Mash publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah C. Mash sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 331 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 331
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Deborah C. Mash D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah C. Mash sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 107
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Deborah C. Mash is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their research work spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on neuroscience and molecular biology. They have contributed to a wide array of topics within these fields, including neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, epigenetics and DNA methylation, tryptophan and brain disorders, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, psychedelics and drug studies, as well as chemical synthesis and alkaloids.

They have published significant work in various journals and venues over recent years. Some of their notable papers include:

  • Single nucleus multi-omics identifies human cortical cell regulatory genome diversity, 2022, Cell Genomics
  • Cell type specific transcriptomic differences in depression show similar patterns between males and females but implicate distinct cell types and genes, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Convergent abnormalities in striatal gene networks in human cocaine use disorder and mouse cocaine administration models, 2023, Science Advances
  • l-Serine Reduces Spinal Cord Pathology in a Vervet Model of Preclinical ALS/MND, 2020, Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors who have worked with them on multiple occasions. These co-authors are Gustavo Turecki, Naguib Mechawar, Corina Nagy, Schahram Akbarian, and Laura M. Fiori.

Deborah C. Mash has published frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Molecular Psychiatry, Nature Communications, Cell Genomics, and UNC Libraries. Their research contributions extend across neuroscience with 36 publications, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology with 20 publications, and medicine with 15 publications. Subfields of study that feature prominently in their work include molecular biology, neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, biological psychiatry, and genetics.

Best Publications

  • The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project

    John Lonsdale;Jeffrey Thomas;Mike Salvatore;Rebecca Phillips

  • The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans

    Kristin G. Ardlie;David S. Deluca;Ayellet V. Segrè

  • The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues

    F Aguet;AN Barbeira;R Bonazzola;A Brown

  • Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

    Adam C. Naj;Gyungah Jun;Gary W. Beecham;Li-San Wang

  • Dynamics of Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Adult Humans

    Kirsty L. Spalding;Olaf Bergmann;Kanar Alkass;Samuel Bernard

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Synchronized age-related gene expression changes across multiple tissues in human and the link to complex diseases

    Jialiang Yang;Tao Huang;Francesca Petralia;Quan Long

  • Exploring the phenotypic consequences of tissue specific gene expression variation inferred from GWAS summary statistics.

    Alvaro N. Barbeira;Scott P. Dickinson;Rodrigo Bonazzola;Jiamao Zheng

  • Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer's disease

    Rebecca Sims;Sven J. Van Der Lee;Adam C. Naj;Céline Bellenguez;Céline Bellenguez

  • Loss of M2 muscarine receptors in the cerebral cortex in Alzheimer's disease and experimental cholinergic denervation

    Deborah C. Mash;Donna D. Flynn;Lincoln T. Potter

  • Neurofibrillary tangles, amyloid, and memory in aging and mild cognitive impairment.

    Angela L. Guillozet;Sandra Weintraub;Deborah C. Mash;M. Marsel Mesulam

  • Genetic variation in human NPY expression affects stress response and emotion

    Zhifeng Zhou;Guanshan Zhu;Guanshan Zhu;Ahmad R. Hariri;Mary Anne Enoch

  • Locus coeruleus neurofibrillary degeneration in aging, mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease.

    Aneta Grudzien;Pamela Shaw;Sandra Weintraub;Eileen Bigio

  • A genomic pathway approach to a complex disease: axon guidance and Parkinson disease.

    Timothy G. Lesnick;Spiridon Papapetropoulos;Deborah C. Mash;Jarlath M H Ffrench-Mullen

  • Pharmacokinetics of Hoasca alkaloids in healthy humans.

    J.C Callaway;D.J McKenna;C.S Grob;G.S Brito

  • Clinicopathologic correlations in 172 cases of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder with or without a coexisting neurologic disorder.

    B. F. Boeve;M. H. Silber;T. J. Ferman;S. C. Lin

  • Adaptive Increase in D3 Dopamine Receptors in the Brain Reward Circuits of Human Cocaine Fatalities

    Julie K. Staley;Deborah C. Mash

  • Cocaethylene: A Unique Cocaine Metabolite Displays High Affinity for the Dopamine Transporter

    W. Lee Hearn;Donna D. Flynn;George W. Hime;Stefan Rose

  • Immunocytochemical localization of the dopamine transporter in human brain.

    Brian J. Ciliax;Genny W. Drash;Julie K. Staley;Sharon Haber

  • Butyrylcholinesterase in the life cycle of amyloid plaques

    A. L. Guillozet;J. F. Smiley;D. C. Mash;M. M. Mesulam

  • The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project

    John Lonsdale;Jeffrey Thomas;Mike Salvatore;Rebecca Phillips

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret A. Pericak-Vance
Margaret A. Pericak-Vance University of Miami
Gary W. Beecham
Gary W. Beecham University of Miami
Eden R. Martin
Eden R. Martin University of Miami
John R. Gilbert
John R. Gilbert University of Miami
M.-Marsel Mesulam
M.-Marsel Mesulam Northwestern University
Philip L. De Jager
Philip L. De Jager Columbia University
Matthew J. Farrer
Matthew J. Farrer University of Florida
John Q. Trojanowski
John Q. Trojanowski University of Pennsylvania
Allan I. Levey
Allan I. Levey Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine doesn't just mean becoming a doctor. Today, there are a variety of online degree programs designed to meet the differing needs and ambitions of students in healthcare. Flexible options are available for those looking to specialize, progress quickly, or enter related fields without a traditional medical school pathway.

For those interested in leadership or advanced practice, there are dnp online programs that allow registered nurses to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree with maximum convenience. If you want to enter the field as soon as possible, fast track lpn programs provide accelerated training to become a Licensed Practical Nurse.

For students passionate about mental health, pursuing the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program can open doors to specialized career opportunities. Additionally, individuals seeking leadership roles outside of direct patient care might consider an online health management degree, which prepares graduates for high-demand positions in health administration.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah C. Mash

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles