World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
13550
World Ranking
8381
National Ranking
4470

David Schwartz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Schwartz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Schwartz is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research work primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with a concentration on clinical psychology, social psychology, education, safety research, and sociology and political science.

Their investigation covers key topics including bullying, victimization, and aggression; youth development and social support; child development and digital technology; child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development; the impact of technology on adolescents; child abuse and trauma; and media influence and health.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Yana Ryjova, Sarah T. Malamut, Tana Luo, Leslie M. Taylor, and Annemarie Kelleghan.

David Schwartz has published in several notable journals, with the most frequent publication venues being:

  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Crohn s & Colitis 360
  • Emerging Adulthood

Some of the recent papers authored by David Schwartz include:

  • The refugee crisis and peer relationships during childhood and adolescence, 2021, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Best Publications

  • Harsh parenting in relation to child emotion regulation and aggression.

    Lei Chang;David Schwartz;Kenneth A. Dodge;Catherine McBride-Chang

  • Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children's peer groups

    David Schwartz

  • Is Peer Victimization Associated with Academic Achievement? A Meta‐analytic Review

    Jonathan Nakamoto;David Schwartz

  • The Early Socialization of Aggressive Victims of Bullying

    David Schwartz;Kenneth A. Dodge;Gregory S. Pettit;John E. Bates

  • Community violence exposure and children's social adjustment in the school peer group: the mediating roles of emotion regulation and social cognition

    David Schwartz;Laura J. Proctor

  • The Emergence of Chronic Peer Victimization in Boys' Play Groups

    David Schwartz;Kenneth A. Dodge;John D. Coie

  • Victimization in the Peer Group and Children's Academic Functioning.

    David Schwartz;Andrea Hopmeyer Gorman;Johnathan Nakamoto;Robin L Toblin

  • Social-Cognitive and Behavioral Correlates of Aggression and Victimization in Boys' Play Groups

    David Schwartz;Kenneth A. Dodge;John D. Coie;Julie A. Hubbard

  • Community Violence Exposure and Children's Academic Functioning

    David Schwartz;Andrea Hopmeyer Gorman

  • Friendship as a Moderating Factor in the Pathway Between Early Harsh Home Environment and Later Victimization in the Peer Group

    David A. Schwartz;Kenneth A. Dodge;Gregory S. Pettit;John E. Bates

  • The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys' reactive and proactive aggression.

    Julie A. Hubbard;Kenneth A. Dodge;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;John D. Coie

  • Social information processing mechanisms in aggressive behavior.

    Kenneth A. Dodge;David Schwartz

  • Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups : Links with academic performance and school attendance

    David Schwartz;Andrea Hopmeyer Gorman;Jonathan Nakamoto;Tara McKay

  • The aggressive victim of bullying: Emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers.

    David Schwartz;Laura J. Proctor;Deborah H. Chien

  • Social–cognitive and behavioral attributes of aggressive victims of bullying☆

    Robin L. Toblin;David Schwartz;Andrea Hopmeyer Gorman;Tania Abou-ezzeddine

  • Early behavior problems as a predictor of later peer group victimization: moderators and mediators in the pathways of social risk.

    David Schwartz;Steven McFadyen-Ketchum;Kenneth A. Dodge;Gregory S. Pettit

  • Victimization in South Korean Children's Peer Groups

    David Schwartz;JoAnn M. Farver;Lei Chang;Yoolim Lee-Shin

  • Peer group victimization as a predictor of children's behavior problems at home and in school

    D. Schwartz;S. A. McFadyen-Ketchum;Kenneth A. Dodge;G. S. Pettit

  • Correlates of victimization in Chinese children's peer groups.

    David Schwartz;Lei Chang;JoAnn M. Farver

  • Popularity in the peer system

    Antonius H. N. Cillessen;David Schwartz;Lara Mayeux

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth A. Dodge
Kenneth A. Dodge Duke University
Lei Chang
Lei Chang University of Macau
John E. Bates
John E. Bates Indiana University
Gregory S. Pettit
Gregory S. Pettit Auburn University
Jo Ann M. Farver
Jo Ann M. Farver University of Southern California
Antonius H. N. Cillessen
Antonius H. N. Cillessen Radboud University
John D. Coie
John D. Coie Duke University
Jennifer E. Lansford
Jennifer E. Lansford Duke University
Julie A. Hubbard
Julie A. Hubbard University of Delaware
Wendy Troop-Gordon
Wendy Troop-Gordon Auburn University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Psychology often explore related fields, with Social Work being a particularly popular choice. Many universities in the United States offer flexible online Social Work degrees, allowing students to balance their studies and personal commitments.

Career options with a background in Social Work or Psychology are diverse. Graduates can pursue roles in counseling, healthcare, community organizations, or government agencies. Specialized tracks can lead to positions supporting children, families, or at-risk populations.

Prospective students looking for region-specific programs can check out the popular social work programs in Duluth or the popular social work programs in Pittsburgh. For those seeking the top-ranked social work degree programs in North Carolina, numerous highly rated options are available.

If you are searching for affordable and flexible online study, the best value online bsw programs in Ohio provide excellent education without compromising quality. Exploring these related programs can help you find a career pathway that fits your interests and long-term goals.

Best Scientists Citing David Schwartz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles