World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
31072
World Ranking
10119
National Ranking
5211

David G. Nathan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Nathan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 465 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David G. Nathan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Nathan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1990 - US President's National Medal of Science "For his contributions to the understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of thalassemia; for his contributions to the understanding of disorders of red cell permeability; for his contributions to the understanding of the regulation of erythropoiesis; and for his contributions to the raining of a generation of hematologists and oncologists.", Presented by President Bush at a White House East Room Ceremony on November 13, 1990.
  • 1983 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

David G. Nathan is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans multiple topics and subfields, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach across science and history.

Recent publications by David G. Nathan include the following:

  • Blood Relations: Transfusion and the Making of Human Genetics Jenny Bangham Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2020 (2021) published in The FASEB Journal

Other papers within their broader network of research encompass diverse topics and venues, including:

  • COVID-19, nuclear war, and global warming: lessons for our vulnerable world (2020) published in The Lancet
  • NNKTT120, an anti-iNKT cell monoclonal antibody, produces rapid and sustained iNKT cell depletion in adults with sickle cell disease (2020) published in UNC Libraries
  • Correcting the record on anemia of aging: a statistical reanalysis (2023) published in Blood Advances
  • Philosophical and religious-ethical aspects of intellectual property (2024) published in Bulletin of the Karaganda university History Philosophy series

Coauthors frequently collaborating with David G. Nathan include:

  • James E. Muller
  • Joshua J. Field
  • Elaine M. Majerus
  • Kenneth I. Ataga
  • Elliott Vichinsky

David G. Nathan's frequent publication venues reflect a range of disciplinary outlets:

  • The Lancet
  • The FASEB Journal
  • UNC Libraries
  • Blood Advances
  • Bulletin of the Karaganda university History Philosophy series

The scientist's main fields and subfields of study include:

  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Hematology
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science

David G. Nathan's research focuses on several key topics:

  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Nuclear Issues and Defense
  • Risk Perception and Management
  • History of Science and Medicine
  • Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction

The scientist has received multiple awards recognizing their scientific contributions:

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1983)
  • US President's National Medal of Science (1990) presented by President Bush for contributions related to thalassemia, red cell permeability, regulation of erythropoiesis, and training hematologists and oncologists
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (1992)

Best Publications

  • Quantitative Nitroblue Tetrazolium Test in Chronic Granulomatous Disease

    Robert L. Baehner;David G. Nathan

  • Survival in medically treated patients with homozygous beta-thalassemia.

    Nancy F. Olivieri;David G. Nathan;James H. MacMillan;Alan S. Wayne

  • Hematology of Infancy and Childhood

    [edited by] David G. Nathan;Frank A. Oski

  • Nathan and Oski's Hematology of Infancy and Childhood

    [edited by] David G. Nathan;Stuart H. Orkin

  • Severe Aplastic Anemia: A Prospective Study of the Effect of Early Marrow Transplantation on Acute Mortality

    BM Camitta;ED Thomas;DG Nathan;G Santos

  • Hydroxyurea enhances fetal hemoglobin production in sickle cell anemia.

    O S Platt;S H Orkin;G Dover;G P Beardsley

  • Introduction of new genetic material into pluripotent haematopoietic stem cells of the mouse

    David A. Williams;David A. Williams;Ihor R. Lemischka;David G. Nathan;Richard C. Mulligan

  • Leukocyte Oxidase: Defective Activity in Chronic Granulomatous Disease

    Robert L. Baehner;David G. Nathan

  • Stimulation of haematopoiesis in primates by continuous infusion of recombinant human GM-CSF

    Robert E. Donahue;Elizabeth A. Wang;David K. Stone;Robert Kamen

  • HUMAN ERYTHROID BURST-FORMING UNIT: T-CELL REQUIREMENT FOR PROLIFERATION IN VITRO*

    D G Nathan;L Chess;D G Hillman;B Clarke

  • Human recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: a multilineage hematopoietin.

    Colin A. Sieff;Stephen G. Emerson;Robert E. Donahue;David G. Nathan

  • Continuous Subcutaneous Administration of Deferoxamine in Patients with Iron Overload

    Richard D. Propper;Richard D. Propper;Barry Cooper;Barry Cooper;Robert R. Rufo;Robert R. Rufo;Arthur W. Nienhuis;Arthur W. Nienhuis

  • Effectiveness and safety of ICL670 in iron-loaded patients with thalassaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial

    Eric Nisbet-Brown;Nancy F Olivieri;Nancy F Olivieri;Patricia J Giardina;Patricia J Giardina;Robert W Grady;Robert W Grady

  • Human IL-3 and GM-CSF Act Synergistically in Stimulating Hematopoiesis in Primates

    Robert E. Donahue;Jasbir Seehra;Mark Metzger;Denise Lefebvre

  • Exome sequencing identifies GATA1 mutations resulting in Diamond-Blackfan anemia

    Vijay G. Sankaran;Roxanne Ghazvinian;Ron Do;Prathapan Thiru

  • Selection of patients for bone marrow transplantation in severe aplastic anemia.

    Bruce M. Camitta;Joel M. Rappeport;Robertson Parkman;David G. Nathan

  • AUTOLOGOUS BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN CALLA-POSITIVE ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKAEMIA AFTER IN-VITRO TREATMENT WITH J5 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY AND COMPLEMENT

    Jerome Ritz;Jerome Ritz;Robert C. Bast;Luis A. Clavell;Luis A. Clavell;Thierry Hercend;Thierry Hercend

  • Ribosomal Protein S24 Gene Is Mutated in Diamond-Blackfan Anemia

    Hanna T. Gazda;Agnieszka Grabowska;Lilia B. Merida-Long;Elzbieta Latawiec

  • Prevention of cardiac disease by subcutaneous deferoxamine in patients with thalassemia major.

    Lawrence Wolfe;Nancy Olivieri;Darlene Sallan;Steven Colan

  • Thalassemia: The consequences of unbalanced hemoglobin synthesis☆

    David G. Nathan;Robert B. Gunn

Frequent Co-Authors

Colin A. Sieff
Colin A. Sieff Harvard University
Stuart H. Orkin
Stuart H. Orkin Harvard University
Yuet Wai Kan
Yuet Wai Kan University of California, San Francisco
Bruce M. Camitta
Bruce M. Camitta Medical College of Wisconsin
Robertson Parkman
Robertson Parkman University of Southern California
Stephen E. Sallan
Stephen E. Sallan Harvard University
Barbara A. Miller
Barbara A. Miller Pennsylvania State University
Vijay G. Sankaran
Vijay G. Sankaran Harvard University
David J. Weatherall
David J. Weatherall University of Oxford
Alan H. Beggs
Alan H. Beggs Harvard Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA offers a wide range of educational and career opportunities beyond the traditional MD path. Those interested in the medical field but seeking a faster or alternative route may consider roles in allied health, nursing, administration, and billing.

For example, financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes can help students enter healthcare administration roles quickly and affordably. If you’re considering nursing, some programs offer flexibility by being nursing school no entrance exam options, eliminating the need for lengthy prerequisites.

Aiming for a leadership position? Pursuing an online healthcare administration degree enables you to enter management roles within the medical sector. For current nurses, adn to np bridge programs provide a direct pathway from associate’s degrees to becoming a Nurse Practitioner, opening new career prospects.

These pathways can accommodate diverse backgrounds and schedules, allowing you to begin or advance your healthcare career online, and often at an accelerated pace.

Best Scientists Citing David G. Nathan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles