World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
93
Citations
49537
World Ranking
953
National Ranking
471

Molecular Biology

D-Index
93
Citations
49537
World Ranking
662
National Ranking
364

Andrew W. Murray publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew W. Murray sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 191 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Andrew W. Murray D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew W. Murray sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2014 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Andrew W. Murray is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the domain of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, encompassing a total of 95 publications. Within this broad field, their subfields of focus include Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cell Biology, Plant Science, and Food Science.

Their scientific contributions are reflected in a variety of research topics, emphasizing:

  • Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis

Frequent publication venues for Andrew W. Murray include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 13 papers, Current Biology with 9 papers, eLife with 3 papers, PLoS Biology with 2 papers, and PLoS Genetics with 2 papers.

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Many, but not all, lineage-specific genes can be explained by homology detection failure" (2020, PLoS Biology)
  • "Mixing genome annotation methods in a comparative analysis inflates the apparent number of lineage-specific genes" (2022, Current Biology)
  • "Cohesion is established during DNA replication utilising chromosome associated cohesin rings as well as those loaded de novo onto nascent DNAs" (2020, eLife)
  • "A Putative Bet-Hedging Strategy Buffers Budding Yeast against Environmental Instability" (2020, Current Biology)
  • "Polymerization in the actin ATPase clan regulates hexokinase activity in yeast" (2020, Science)

Andrew W. Murray has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Marco Fumasoni, Caroline M. Weisman, Sean R. Eddy, Julien Barrere, and Piyush Nanda.

Recognition for their work includes election as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences and being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2014. Additionally, they became a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2000.

Best Publications

  • From molecular to modular cell biology.

    Leland H. Hartwell;John J. Hopfield;Stanislas Leibler;Andrew W. Murray

  • Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway

    Michael Glotzer;Andrew W. Murray;Marc W. Kirschner

  • Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli.

    Grzegorz Kudla;Andrew W. Murray;David Tollervey;Joshua B. Plotkin

  • Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast.

    Rong Li;Andrew W. Murray

  • Cyclin synthesis drives the early embryonic cell cycle.

    Andrew W. Murray;Marc W. Kirschner

  • Recycling the Cell Cycle: Cyclins Revisited

    Andrew W Murray

  • The role of cyclin synthesis and degradation in the control of maturation promoting factor activity

    Andrew W. Murray;Mark J. Solomon;Marc W. Kirschner

  • Cell cycle extracts.

    Andrew W. Murray

  • The Cell Cycle: An Introduction

    Andrew Wood Murray;Tim Hunt

  • Creative blocks: cell-cycle checkpoints and feedback controls

    Andrew W. Murray

  • Integrating genetic approaches into the discovery of anticancer drugs

    Leland H. Hartwell;Philippe Szankasi;Christopher J. Roberts;Andrew W. Murray

  • Dominoes and clocks: the union of two views of the cell cycle.

    Andrew W. Murray;Marc W. Kirschner

  • In vivo localization of DNA sequences and visualization of large-scale chromatin organization using lac operator/repressor recognition.

    Carmen C. Robinett;Aaron Straight;Gang Li;Carol Willhelm

  • Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells.

    W.F Marshall;A Straight;J.F Marko;J Swedlow

  • Budding Yeast Cdc20: A Target of the Spindle Checkpoint

    Lena H. Hwang;Lucius F. Lau;Lucius F. Lau;Dana L. Smith;Dana L. Smith;Cathy A. Mistrot;Cathy A. Mistrot

  • Association of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Component XMAD2 with Unattached Kinetochores

    Rey-Huei Chen;Jennifer C. Waters;E. D. Salmon;Andrew W. Murray

  • Anaphase is initiated by proteolysis rather than by the inactivation of maturation-promoting factor

    Sandra L. Holloway;Michael Glotzer;Randall W. King;Andrew W. Murray

  • GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein–protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion

    Aaron F. Straight;Andrew S. Belmont;Carmen C. Robinett;Andrew W. Murray

  • Cell cycle: A snip separates sisters

    Andrew Murray

  • Construction of artificial chromosomes in yeast

    Andrew W. Murray;Jack W. Szostak

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack W. Szostak
Jack W. Szostak University of Chicago
Aaron F. Straight
Aaron F. Straight Stanford University
Marc W. Kirschner
Marc W. Kirschner Harvard University
Sue Biggins
Sue Biggins Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Andrew S. Belmont
Andrew S. Belmont University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Edward D. Salmon
Edward D. Salmon University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Sean R. Eddy
Sean R. Eddy Harvard University
Rong Li
Rong Li Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Peter K. Sorger
Peter K. Sorger Harvard University
Kevin R. Foster
Kevin R. Foster University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA can open doors to a variety of dynamic online degree routes and professional pathways. For those interested in the intersection of biology and psychology, an online masters mental health counseling program provides a flexible way to build skills used in clinical settings, with special relevance to those studying neurobiology and genetics.

If you’re seeking specialization in legal and investigative settings, there are high paying jobs in forensic psychology for graduates who understand biological influences on behavior. Additionally, for career paths focused on supporting youth, child psychology masters programs offer advanced study in developmental science and adolescent brain development.

Many professionals also consider completing an online master's in counseling to better integrate molecular insights with practical, people-focused skills. Each of these programs complements a foundation in Molecular Biology and helps shape a diverse range of rewarding careers in health, education, and justice.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew W. Murray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles