World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William J. Gullick

William J. Gullick

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
21595
World Ranking
12391
National Ranking
1164

William J. Gullick publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Gullick sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 226 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William J. Gullick D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Gullick sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William J. Gullick is affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. The available data does not list recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues associated with this researcher.

There is no detailed information regarding the main fields or subfields of study linked to William J. Gullick, nor are there any recorded main topics of work.

Similarly, there are no documented book publications or awards attributed to this individual in the provided data.

This profile reflects only verified information supplied, focusing on affiliation without further detail on research output, collaborators, or academic contributions.

Best Publications

  • Expression of c-erbB-2 Oncoprotein: A Prognostic Indicator in Human Breast Cancer

    C Wright;B Angus;S Nicholson;Sainsbury

  • Correlation of c-erbB-2 Gene Amplification and Protein Expression in Human Breast Carcinoma with Nodal Status and Nuclear Grading

    Mark S. Berger;Gottfried W. Locher;Susanne Saurer;William J. Gullick

  • Identification of c-erbB-3 binding sites for phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase and SHC using an EGF receptor/c-erbB-3 chimera.

    S.A. Prigent;W.J. Gullick

  • c-erbB-2 protein overexpression in breast cancer is a risk factor in patients with involved and uninvolved lymph nodes

    W J Gullick;S B Love;C Wright;D M Barnes

  • Evaluation of epidermal growth factor-related growth factors and receptors and of neoangiogenesis in completely resected stage I-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer: amphiregulin and microvessel count are independent prognostic indicators of survival.

    G Fontanini;M De Laurentiis;S Vignati;S Chinè

  • Expression of epidermal Growth factor receptors on human cervical, ovarian, and vulval carcinomas

    William J. Gullick;Judith J. Marsden;Nigel Whittle;Bruce Ward

  • Brown and white adipose tissues: intrinsic differences in gene expression and response to cold exposure in mice

    Meritxell Rosell;Myrsini Kaforou;Andrea Frontini;Anthony Okolo

  • The epidermal growth factor receptor family

    L.A. Bazley;William J. Gullick

  • c-erbB-2 oncoprotein expression in primary and advanced breast cancer

    C. Lovekin;I. O. Ellis;A. Locker;J. F. R. Robertson

  • Transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor in human pancreatic cancer.

    Claire M. Barton;Peter A. Hall;Peter A. Hall;Christine M. Hughes;William J. Gullick

  • The epidermal growth factor receptor in human pancreatic cancer.

    Nicholas R. Lemoine;Christine M. Hughes;Claire M. Barton;Richard Poulsom

  • Expression of the c-erbB-4/HER4 protein and mRNA in normal human fetal and adult tissues and in a survey of nine solid tumour types.

    Radhika Srinivasan;Richard Poulsom;Helen C. Hurst;William J. Gullick

  • Prognostic significance of c-erbB-2 and estrogen receptor status in human breast cancer.

    Amanda H. McCann;Peter A. Dervan;Myra O'Regan;Mary B. Codd

  • Expression of the c-erbB-3 protein in normal human adult and fetal tissues.

    Prigent Sa;Lemoine Nr;Hughes Cm;Plowman Gd

  • Relationship between EGF-R, c-erbB-2 protein expression and Ki67 immunostaining in breast cancer and hormone sensitivity.

    R.I. Nicholson;R.A. McClelland;P. Finlay;C.L. Eaton

  • c-erbB-2 expression in benign and malignant breast disease.

    BA Gusterson;LG Machin;WJ Gullick;NM Gibbs

  • A monoclonal antibody recognizing human cancers with amplification/overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor.

    Achim A Jungbluth;Elisabeth Stockert;H J Su Huang;Vincent P Collins

  • Differential Isolation of Normal Luminal Mammary Epithelial Cells and Breast Cancer Cells from Primary and Metastatic Sites Using Selective Media

    Stephen P. Ethier;Michael L. Mahacek;William J. Gullick;Thomas S. Frank

  • The c-erb B-2 proto-oncogene in human pancreatic cancer.

    P. A. Hall;C. M. Hughes;S. L. Staddon;P. I. Richman

  • The Role of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Breast Cancer

    Samuel K. W. Chan;Mark E. Hill;William J. Gullick

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Salomon
David S. Salomon National Institutes of Health
Ian O. Ellis
Ian O. Ellis University of Nottingham
Nicholas R. Lemoine
Nicholas R. Lemoine Queen Mary University of London
Jon Lindstrom
Jon Lindstrom University of Pennsylvania
Robert Ian Nicholson
Robert Ian Nicholson Cardiff University
Nicola Normanno
Nicola Normanno Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale"
Fortunato Ciardiello
Fortunato Ciardiello University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Sarah E Pinder
Sarah E Pinder King's College London
Michael J.E. Sternberg
Michael J.E. Sternberg Imperial College London
Nancy E. Hynes
Nancy E. Hynes Friedrich Miescher Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of related healthcare degrees and new career options. For those interested in taking the next step or changing paths, the growth of online programs has made education in this sector more accessible than ever.

If you’re currently a registered nurse, you might consider the cheapest rn to bsn options to upgrade your credentials and expand your opportunities. For individuals holding non-nursing bachelor’s degrees but seeking a fast entry into nursing, direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors can offer a streamlined route into advanced practice roles.

Those pursuing leadership or academic careers in nursing will find doctorate in nursing education online programs to be both flexible and cost-effective ways to reach the profession’s highest levels. Additionally, newcomers with limited healthcare backgrounds often look for what is the easiest nursing program to get into as a starting point.

No matter your background, online degrees and creative career pathways can help you contribute meaningfully to the future of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Gullick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles