World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas F. Tedder

Thomas F. Tedder

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
147
Citations
70141
World Ranking
132
National Ranking
88

Thomas F. Tedder publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Tedder sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 446 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Thomas F. Tedder D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Tedder sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 147 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas F. Tedder was affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research spanned multiple fields within medicine, immunology, and molecular biology, reflected in their publication and topic records.

The main fields of study for Thomas F. Tedder included:

  • Medicine
  • Immunology and Microbiology
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these broader fields, their subfields of study comprised:

  • Immunology
  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Their work addressed several specific scientific topics as well, notably:

  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research

Thomas F. Tedder published research papers in diverse venues, with the most frequent locations being UNC Libraries and Science Translational Medicine. Other important venues included The Journal of Gene Medicine, Science Signaling, and the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

Significant publications by Thomas F. Tedder included:

  • Immunotoxin-αCD40 therapy activates innate and adaptive immunity and generates a durable antitumor response in glioblastoma models, 2023, Science Translational Medicine
  • The inhibitory coreceptor CD22 restores B cell signaling by developmentally regulating Cd45−/− immunodeficient B cells, 2022, Science Signaling
  • Successful AAV8 readministration: Suppression of capsid-specific neutralizing antibodies by a combination treatment of bortezomib and CD20 mAb in a mouse model of Pompe disease, 2023, The Journal of Gene Medicine
  • Regulatory B Cell (B10 Cell) Expansion during Listeria Infection Governs Innate and Cellular Immune Responses in Mice, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Regulatory B10 Cells Increase after Rituximab Therapy but Not after Conventional Immunosuppression in Patients with Pemphigus, 2020, Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Throughout their research career, Thomas F. Tedder frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Su Jin Choi
  • John S. Yi
  • Dwight D. Koeberl
  • Baodong Sun
  • Priya S. Kishnani

These collaborations often appeared in areas related to immunology, gene therapy, and cellular immune responses. Their work contributed to understanding immune cell function, immunotherapy strategies, and genetic engineering applications.

Best Publications

  • B lymphocytes: how they develop and function

    Tucker W. LeBien;Thomas F. Tedder

  • CD14+ blood monocytes can differentiate into functionally mature CD83+ dendritic cells

    Liang-Ji Zhou;Thomas F. Tedder

  • A Regulatory B Cell Subset with a Unique CD1dhiCD5+ Phenotype Controls T Cell-Dependent Inflammatory Responses

    Koichi Yanaba;Jean-David Bouaziz;Karen M. Haas;Jonathan C. Poe

  • The selectins: vascular adhesion molecules.

    Thomas F. Tedder;Douglas A. Steeber;Anjun Chen;Pablo Engel

  • Characterization of a rare IL-10–competent B-cell subset in humans that parallels mouse regulatory B10 cells

    Yohei Iwata;Takashi Matsushita;Mayuka Horikawa;David J. DiLillo

  • Epstein-Barr virus receptor of human B lymphocytes is the C3d receptor CR2.

    J D Fingeroth;J J Weis;T F Tedder;J L Strominger

  • B cells promote insulin resistance through modulation of T cells and production of pathogenic IgG antibodies

    Daniel A Winer;Shawn Winer;Shawn Winer;Lei Shen;Persis P Wadia

  • Human blood dendritic cells selectively express CD83, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily.

    Liang-Ji Zhou;T. F. Tedder

  • Regulatory B cells inhibit EAE initiation in mice while other B cells promote disease progression

    Takashi Matsushita;Koichi Yanaba;Jean-David Bouaziz;Manabu Fujimoto

  • The Innate Mononuclear Phagocyte Network Depletes B Lymphocytes through Fc Receptor–dependent Mechanisms during Anti-CD20 Antibody Immunotherapy

    Junji Uchida;Yasuhito Hamaguchi;Julie A. Oliver;Jeffrey V. Ravetch

  • Tumor-targeted T cells modified to secrete IL-12 eradicate systemic tumors without need for prior conditioning

    Hollie J. Pegram;James C. Lee;Erik G. Hayman;Gavin H. Imperato

  • Fractalkine and CX3CR1 mediate a novel mechanism of leukocyte capture, firm adhesion, and activation under physiologic flow

    Alan M. Fong;Lisa A. Robinson;Douglas A. Steeber;Thomas F. Tedder

  • Regulatory B cells control T-cell autoimmunity through IL-21-dependent cognate interactions

    Ayumi Yoshizaki;Tomomitsu Miyagaki;David J. DiLillo;Takashi Matsushita

  • B-1a and B-1b Cells Exhibit Distinct Developmental Requirements and Have Unique Functional Roles in Innate and Adaptive Immunity to S. pneumoniae

    Karen M. Haas;Jonathan C. Poe;Douglas A. Steeber;Thomas F. Tedder

  • CD20: a regulator of cell-cycle progression of B lymphocytes

    Thomas F. Tedder;Pablo Engel

  • Sequential contribution of L- and P-selectin to leukocyte rolling in vivo.

    K Ley;D C Bullard;M L Arbonés;R Bosse

  • Abnormal B lymphocyte delevopment, activation, and differentiation in mice that lack or overexpress the CD19 signal transduction molecule

    Pablo Engel;Liang Ji Zhou;David C. Ord;Shinichi Sato

  • CD22 Is Both a Positive and Negative Regulator of B Lymphocyte Antigen Receptor Signal Transduction: Altered Signaling in CD22-Deficient Mice

    Shinichi Sato;Ann S. Miller;Makoto Inaoki;Cheryl B. Bock

  • B10 cells and regulatory B cells balance immune responses during inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer.

    David J. DiLillo;Takashi Matsushita;Thomas F. Tedder

  • L-selectin-deficient mice have impaired leukocyte recruitment into inflammatory sites.

    T. F. Tedder;D. A.F Steeber;P. Pizcueta

Frequent Co-Authors

Manabu Fujimoto
Manabu Fujimoto Osaka University
Shinichi Sato
Shinichi Sato University of Tokyo
Koichi Yanaba
Koichi Yanaba Jikei University School of Medicine
Minoru Hasegawa
Minoru Hasegawa University of Fukui
Stuart F. Schlossman
Stuart F. Schlossman Harvard University
Kazuhiko Takehara
Kazuhiko Takehara Kanazawa University
Douglas A. Steeber
Douglas A. Steeber University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Pablo Engel
Pablo Engel University of Barcelona
Max D. Cooper
Max D. Cooper Emory University
Kunihiko Tamaki
Kunihiko Tamaki University of Tokyo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Immunology, exploring allied healthcare fields is a great option. Many students seek accessible programs like the best easiest lpn programs to get into, which provide a streamlined pathway into nursing with practical, hands-on training.

If you're aiming for advanced clinical roles, consider looking into the easy nurse practitioner programs to get into. These programs often balance rigorous coursework with flexible formats, ideal for working professionals.

Mental health is another growing sector, especially with the rising demand for specialized practitioners. Online options like the top online pmhnp programs offer excellent clinical placement rates—crucial for gaining real-world experience in psychiatric mental health nursing.

Additionally, affordability remains a top concern for many students. Exploring the cheap psych np programs can provide quality education without the burden of excessive debt, helping you achieve your career goals in a financially sustainable way.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas F. Tedder

Recently Published Articles