World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
11587
World Ranking
7192
National Ranking
3298

Thomas A. Gasiewicz publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. Gasiewicz sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 154 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thomas A. Gasiewicz D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. Gasiewicz sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas A. Gasiewicz is affiliated with the University of Rochester Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with notable focus areas in Cell Biology and Hematology.

The scientist's work encompasses multiple key topics, including:

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics

Gasiewicz has contributed to research on molecular pathways relevant to hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Recent papers authored include:

  • Impact of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor on Aurora A Kinase and the G2/M Phase Pathway in Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells, 2023, published in Receptors
  • Impact of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor on Aurora A kinase and the G2/M phase pathway in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, 2022, published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors accompanying Gasiewicz in these studies are:

  • Anthony M. Franchini
  • Keegan Vaughan
  • Soumyaroop Bhattacharya
  • Kameshwar P. Singh
  • B. Paige Lawrence

The scientist's research has been published mainly in venues such as:

  • Receptors
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Novel compound 2-methyl-2H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid (2-methyl-4-o-tolylazo-phenyl)-amide (CH-223191) prevents 2,3,7,8-TCDD-induced toxicity by antagonizing the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

    Sun-Hee Kim;Ellen C. Henry;Dong-Kyu Kim;Yun-Hee Kim

  • Role of the MEOX2 homeobox gene in neurovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer disease

    Zhenhua Wu;Huang Guo;Huang Guo;Nienwen Chow;Jan Sallstrom

  • Comparisons of estimated human body burdens of dioxinlike chemicals and TCDD body burdens in experimentally exposed animals.

    Michael J. DeVito;Linda S. Birnbaum;William H. Farland;Thomas A. Gasiewicz

  • Estrogen receptor alpha is necessary in thymic development and estradiol-induced thymic alterations.

    Staples Je;Gasiewicz Ta;Fiore Nc;Lubahn Db

  • Distribution, excretion, and metabolism of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, and B6D2F1/J mice.

    T A Gasiewicz;L E Geiger;G Rucci;R A Neal

  • Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Deficient Mice Develop Heightened Inflammatory Responses to Cigarette Smoke and Endotoxin Associated with Rapid Loss of the Nuclear Factor-κB Component RelB

    Thomas H. Thatcher;Sanjay B. Maggirwar;Carolyn J. Baglole;Heather F. Lakatos

  • The examination and quantitation of tissue cytosolic receptors for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin using hydroxylapatite.

    T.A. Gasiewicz;R.A. Neal

  • 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin tissue distribution, excretion, and effects on clinical chemical parameters in guinea pigs.

    T.A. Gasiewicz;R.A. Neal

  • Epigallocatechin gallate inhibits aryl hydrocarbon receptor gene transcription through an indirect mechanism involving binding to a 90 kDa heat shock protein.

    Christine M Palermo;Claire A Westlake;Thomas A Gasiewicz

  • Alpha-naphthoflavone acts as an antagonist of 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin by forming an inactive complex with the Ah receptor

    T A Gasiewicz;G Rucci

  • Analysis of Structural Requirements for Ah Receptor Antagonist Activity: Ellipticines, Flavones, and Related Compounds

    Thomas A. Gasiewicz;Andrew S. Kende;George Rucci;Brenda Whitney

  • Cytosolic receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Evidence for a homologous nature among various mammalian species.

    T A Gasiewicz;G Rucci

  • Thymic alterations induced by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin are strictly dependent on aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation in hemopoietic cells

    J E Staples;F G Murante;N C Fiore;T A Gasiewicz

  • The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Attenuates Tobacco Smoke-induced Cyclooxygenase-2 and Prostaglandin Production in Lung Fibroblasts through Regulation of the NF-κB Family Member RelB

    Carolyn J. Baglole;Sanjay B. Maggirwar;Thomas A. Gasiewicz;Thomas H. Thatcher

  • Tissue distribution, excretion, and metabolism of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in the Golden Syrian hamster.

    James R. Olson;Thomas A. Gasiewicz;Robert A. Neal

  • The Toxicokinetics of 2, 3, 7, 8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in Mammalian Systems

    R. A. Neal;J. R. Olson;T. A. Gasiewicz;L. E. Geiger

  • (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate is a novel Hsp90 inhibitor.

    Zhengyu Yin;Ellen C. Henry;Thomas A. Gasiewicz

  • Protein-DNA interactions at a dioxin-responsive enhancer. Evidence that the transformed Ah receptor is heteromeric.

    Cornelis Elferink;Thomas A. Gasiewicz;James P. Whitlock

  • Lymphocyte stem cell alterations following perinatal exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

    J S Fine;T A Gasiewicz;A E Silverstone

  • Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Expression and Activity in Cerebellar Granule Neuroblasts: Implications for Development and Dioxin Neurotoxicity

    Mary A. Williamson;Thomas A. Gasiewicz;Lisa A. Opanashuk

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen D. Dertinger
Stephen D. Dertinger University of Rochester
Arnold Schecter
Arnold Schecter The University of Texas at Austin
Mark E. Hahn
Mark E. Hahn Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Joyce A. Goldstein
Joyce A. Goldstein National Institutes of Health
Richard P. Phipps
Richard P. Phipps University of Rochester
Berislav V. Zlokovic
Berislav V. Zlokovic University of Southern California
Michael I. Luster
Michael I. Luster West Virginia University
Sanjay B. Maggirwar
Sanjay B. Maggirwar George Washington University
Frank A. Middleton
Frank A. Middleton SUNY Upstate Medical University
Florence M. Hofman
Florence M. Hofman University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to various online degrees and healthcare career pathways. Many students explore options beyond traditional laboratory roles, such as management and administrative careers. For those interested in leadership, online healthcare mba programs offer a flexible route to transition into healthcare management, combining scientific backgrounds with business expertise.

Alternatively, medical coding and billing are fast-growing fields, providing strong job security and competitive salaries. Understanding ccs vs cpc certification is vital, as these certifications influence your career prospects, job roles, and earning potential.

Those considering a career in medical coding should research what is medical coding salary to gain insight into entry-level earnings and long-term growth. The job outlook for medical billing and coding remains positive, with consistent demand across hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies. Exploring these online degrees and certifications can provide Biology and Biochemistry graduates with secure, rewarding alternative career pathways in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas A. Gasiewicz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles