World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
74
Citations
22017
World Ranking
2093
National Ranking
217

Tara L. Spires-Jones publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tara L. Spires-Jones sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 217 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Tara L. Spires-Jones D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tara L. Spires-Jones sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tara L. Spires-Jones is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with considerable focus on Physiology, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, and Pharmacology.

The scientist's work engages deeply with topics that include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis research, cholinesterase and neurodegenerative diseases, dementia and cognitive impairment research, and tryptophan and brain disorders.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Spires-Jones include Jamie Rose, Jane Tulloch, Makis Tzioras, Colin Smith, and Declan King.

Their research has been published extensively in several venues, with notable contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Brain Communications, Alzheimer's & Dementia, European Journal of Neuroscience, and Acta Neuropathologica.

Selected recent papers exemplifying the scope of their research include:

  • "The physiological roles of tau and Aβ: implications for Alzheimer's disease pathology and therapeutics" (2020, Acta Neuropathologica)
  • "Microglia regulate central nervous system myelin growth and integrity" (2022, Nature)
  • "Synaptic degeneration in Alzheimer disease" (2022, Nature Reviews Neurology)
  • "The clinical promise of biomarkers of synapse damage or loss in Alzheimer's disease" (2020, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy)
  • "Reactive astrocytes acquire neuroprotective as well as deleterious signatures in response to Tau and Aß pathology" (2022, Nature Communications)

Best Publications

  • Propagation of Tau Pathology in a Model of Early Alzheimer’s Disease

    Alix de Calignon;Manuela Polydoro;Marc Suárez-Calvet;Marc Suárez-Calvet;Christopher William

  • The intersection of amyloid beta and tau at synapses in Alzheimer’s disease

    Tara L. Spires-Jones;Bradley T. Hyman

  • Rapid appearance and local toxicity of amyloid-beta plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Melanie Meyer-Luehmann;Tara L. Spires-Jones;Claudia Prada;Monica Garcia-Alloza

  • Oligomeric amyloid β associates with postsynaptic densities and correlates with excitatory synapse loss near senile plaques

    Robert M. Koffie;Melanie Meyer-Luehmann;Tadafumi Hashimoto;Kenneth W. Adams

  • Caspase activation precedes and leads to tangles

    Alix de Calignon;Leora M. Fox;Rose Pitstick;George A. Carlson

  • Microglia regulate central nervous system myelin growth and integrity

    Unknown

  • The synaptic accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau oligomers in Alzheimer disease is associated with dysfunction of the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

    Hwan-Ching Tai;Alberto Serrano-Pozo;Tadafumi Hashimoto;Matthew P. Frosch

  • Synaptic degeneration in Alzheimer disease

    Unknown

  • Tau association with synaptic vesicles causes presynaptic dysfunction

    Lujia Zhou;Joseph McInnes;Keimpe Wierda;Matthew Holt

  • Interactions of pathological proteins in neurodegenerative diseases.

    Tara L. Spires-Jones;Johannes Attems;Dietmar Rudolf Thal

  • Amyloid β Induces the Morphological Neurodegenerative Triad of Spine Loss, Dendritic Simplification, and Neuritic Dystrophies through Calcineurin Activation

    Hai Yan Wu;Eloise Hudry;Tadafumi Hashimoto;Kishore Kuchibhotla

  • The physiological roles of tau and Aβ: implications for Alzheimer's disease pathology and therapeutics.

    Sarah A Kent;Tara L Spires-Jones;Claire S Durrant

  • Tau pathophysiology in neurodegeneration: a tangled issue.

    Tara L. Spires-Jones;William H. Stoothoff;Alix de Calignon;Phillip B. Jones

  • Apolipoprotein E, especially apolipoprotein E4, increases the oligomerization of amyloid β peptide

    Tadafumi Hashimoto;Alberto Serrano-Pozo;Yukiko Hori;Kenneth W Adams

  • Apolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β

    Robert M. Koffie;Tadafumi Hashimoto;Hwan-Ching Tai;Kevin R. Kay

  • Alzheimer's disease: synapses gone cold.

    Robert M Koffie;Bradley T Hyman;Tara L Spires-Jones

  • The clinical promise of biomarkers of synapse damage or loss in Alzheimer’s disease

    Martí Colom-Cadena;Tara Spires-Jones;Henrik Zetterberg;Kaj Blennow;Kaj Blennow

  • Beyond the neuron–cellular interactions early in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis

    Christopher M. Henstridge;Bradley T. Hyman;Tara L. Spires-Jones

  • Tau accumulation causes mitochondrial distribution deficits in neurons in a mouse model of tauopathy and in human Alzheimer's disease brain.

    Katherine J. Kopeikina;Katherine J. Kopeikina;George A. Carlson;Rose Pitstick;Adam E. Ludvigson

  • Alzheimer's Therapeutics Targeting Amyloid Beta 1–42 Oligomers II: Sigma-2/PGRMC1 Receptors Mediate Abeta 42 Oligomer Binding and Synaptotoxicity

    Nicholas J. Izzo;Jinbin Xu;Chenbo Zeng;Molly J. Kirk;Molly J. Kirk

  • Nanoparticles enhance brain delivery of blood–brain barrier-impermeable probes for in vivo optical and magnetic resonance imaging

    Robert M. Koffie;Christian T. Farrar;Laiq-Jan Saidi;Christopher M. William

  • Soluble forms of tau are toxic in Alzheimer’s disease

    Katherine J Kopeikina;Bradley T Hyman;Tara L Spires-Jones

  • Amyloid accelerates tau propagation and toxicity in a model of early Alzheimer’s disease

    Amy M Pooler;Amy M Pooler;Manuela Polydoro;Eduardo A Maury;Samantha B Nicholls

  • Pathological Tau Disrupts Ongoing Network Activity

    Noa Menkes-Caspi;Hagar G. Yamin;Vered Kellner;Tara L. Spires-Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Bradley T. Hyman
Bradley T. Hyman Harvard University
Colin Smith
Colin Smith University of Edinburgh
George A. Carlson
George A. Carlson University of California, San Francisco
Brian J. Bacskai
Brian J. Bacskai Harvard University
Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
Sarah E. Harris
Sarah E. Harris University of Edinburgh
Riccardo E. Marioni
Riccardo E. Marioni University of Edinburgh
Matthew P. Frosch
Matthew P. Frosch Harvard University
Andrew M. McIntosh
Andrew M. McIntosh University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying neuroscience in the USA, there are many related online programs and diverse career pathways to consider. The fields of psychology and therapy are closely linked, and pursuing an advanced online degree can open doors to more specialized roles. For those passionate about helping others, psyd programs online allow students to focus on clinical psychology—equipping graduates for licensure and hands-on careers in mental and behavioral health.

Interested in counseling? marriage and family therapy online programs train students to support couples and families, a valuable skill set for those with neuroscience or psychology backgrounds. If you’re eager to accelerate your entry into the workforce, consider 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online, which can help you earn your degree faster.

For students motivated by earning potential, exploring the highest paying bachelor degrees entry-level can be a smart step toward financial stability and long-term satisfaction. Each of these options offers flexible online pathways suitable for students who want to combine neuroscience with other rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Tara L. Spires-Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles