World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 37 6156 5716 439 423 152 8087

Stephen J. Frenkel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen J. Frenkel between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen J. Frenkel published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2020. 14 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2020. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 3 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 6 publications
1976 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen J. Frenkel: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 3
1978 3
1979 1
1980 1
1981 3
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 1
1986 2
1987 3
1988 3
1989 6
1990 5
1991 3
1992 1
1993 3
1994 1
1995 2
1996 3
1997 0
1998 4
1999 2
2000 4
2001 5
2002 5
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 3
2007 2
2008 1
2009 3
2010 2
2011 6
2012 7
2013 4
2014 3
2015 1
2016 6
2017 2
2018 8
2019 8
2020 10
2021 5
2022 8
2023 6
2024 8
2025 6
Total 172
Download as CSV

Stephen J. Frenkel publications per year - data summary

  • Stephen J. Frenkel, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of New South Wales, has 172 publications recorded across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1976 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 10 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1976, 1979, 1980, 1984 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 50 years in the span carry no publications at all (1982, 1983 and 1997).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.7 per year counting only the 47 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 33 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1976-1992: 37 publications (2.2 per year); 1993-2009: 45 publications (2.6 per year); 2010-2025: 90 publications (5.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Stephen J. Frenkel publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Frenkel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 152 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 152
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen J. Frenkel publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Stephen J. Frenkel, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of New South Wales, records 152 publications - the 42nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 42% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Stephen J. Frenkel, and about 58% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Stephen J. Frenkel ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Stephen J. Frenkel D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen J. Frenkel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272 37
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Stephen J. Frenkel D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Stephen J. Frenkel, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of New South Wales, records 37 D-Index - the 23rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 23% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Stephen J. Frenkel, and about 77% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Stephen J. Frenkel ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Stephen J. Frenkel is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia and specializes in the social sciences, particularly focusing on organizational behavior, labor relations, and political science. Their work spans several key subfields including Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Labor Movements and Unions
  • Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Workplace Spirituality and Leadership

Frenkel has contributed to numerous publications, with a frequency in venues such as:

  • Industrial and Labor Relations Review
  • Work Employment and Society
  • Leadership & Organization Development Journal
  • Journal of Service Research
  • Personnel Review

Their recent papers reflect interests in labor governance, workplace dynamics, and employee well-being. These include:

  • "After Rana Plaza: Governing Exploitative Workplace Labour Regimes in Bangladeshi Garment Export Factories" (2022) published in Journal of Industrial Relations
  • "From Rana Plaza to COVID-19: Deficiencies and opportunities for a new labour governance system in garment global supply chains" (2021) published in International Labour Review
  • "When Heroes and Villains Are Victims: How Different Withdrawal Strategies Moderate the Depleting Effects of Customer Incivility on Frontline Employees" (2020) published in Journal of Service Research
  • "Organizational support and employee thriving at work: exploring the underlying mechanisms" (2020) published in Personnel Review
  • "Supervisor-subordinate guanxi and employee thriving at work: the key role of relation-generated resources" (2020) published in Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

In addition to journal articles, Frenkel has authored books published by Cornell University Press eBooks, including:

  • "Organized Labor in the Asia-Pacific Region" (2020)
  • "Industrialization and Labor Relations" (2020)

Frequent collaborators include Xiaoyu Guan, Elke Schuessler, Jeffrey Harrod, Yumeng Yue, and Helena Nguyen. Their joint work covers multiple topics across labor governance and organizational studies.

Best Publications

  • On the Front Line: Organization of Work in the Information Economy

    Stephen J. Frenkel;Marek Korczynski;Karen Shire;May Tam

  • Beyond bureaucracy? Work organization in call centres

    Stephen J. Frenkel;May Tam;Marek Korczynski;Karen Shire

  • Shop stewards in action: The organization of workplace conflict and accommodation

    Eric Batstone;Ian Boraston;Stephen Frenkel

  • ORGANIZATIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL COMMITMENT: KNOWLEDGE WORKERS IN LARGE CORPORATIONS

    Tam Yeuk-Mui May;Marek Korczynski;Stephen J. Frenkel

  • Relationships between Emotional Labor, Job Performance, and Turnover.

    Robyn E. Goodwin;Markus Groth;Stephen J. Frenkel

  • How leader–member exchange, work engagement and HRM consistency explain Chinese luxury hotel employees’ job performance ☆

    Xiaobei Li;Karin Sanders;Stephen Frenkel

  • When Do Customer Contact Employees Satisfy Customers

    Andrew Sergeant;Stephen Frenkel

  • Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The ADIDAS Connection:

    Stephen J. Frenkel;Duncan Scott

  • Globalization, Athletic Footwear Commodity Chains and Employment Relations in China

    Stephen J. Frenkel

  • Service Work in Consumer Capitalism: Customers, Control and Contradictions

    Marek Korczynski;Karen Shire;Stephen Frenkel;May Tam

  • Strategie HRM as process: how HR system and organizational climate strength influence Chinese employee attitude

    Xiaobei Li;Stephen J. Frenkel;Karin Sanders

  • The social organization of strikes

    Eric Batstone;Ian Boraston;Stephen Frenkel

  • Explaining task performance and creativity from perceived organizational support theory: Which mechanisms are more important?

    Chongxin Yu;Stephen J. Frenkel

  • Logics of Action, Globalization, and Changing Employment Relations in China, India, Malaysia, and the Philippines

    Stephen Frenkel;Sarosh Kuruvilla

  • Globalization and Industrial Relations in East Asia: A Three‐Country Comparison

    Stephen J. Frenkel;David Peetz

  • How HR practice, work engagement and job crafting influence employee performance

    Xiaoyu Guan;Stephen Frenkel

  • Divided Workers: Social relations between contract and regular workers in a Korean auto company

    Lee Byoung-Hoon;Stephen J. Frenkel

  • Morale and Workplace Performance

    David L. Weakliem;Stephen J. Frenkel

  • Governance of Labor Standards in Australian and German Garment Supply Chains: The Impact of Rana Plaza:

    Elke Schuessler;Stephen J. Frenkel;Chris F. Wright

  • Managing people in China: perceptions of expatriate managers

    Andrew Sergeant;Stephen Frenkel

  • Management of Knowledge-Intensive Companies

    Stephen Frenkel

Frequent Co-Authors

Karin Sanders
Karin Sanders University of New South Wales
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jörg Sydow
Jörg Sydow Freie Universität Berlin
André Spicer
André Spicer City, University of London
Daniel P. Skarlicki
Daniel P. Skarlicki University of British Columbia
Christopher Wright
Christopher Wright University of Sydney
Stephen J. Wood
Stephen J. Wood University of Melbourne
Peter Boxall
Peter Boxall University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career pathways in Social Sciences and Humanities often starts with the right degree program. Today, students have flexible options to study fully online, making advanced credentials more accessible. For instance, if you are interested in clinical psychology, consider enrolling in one of the online psyd programs to prepare for a career as a licensed psychologist.

For those drawn to helping families and couples, one of the rapidly growing fields is marriage and family therapy. You can begin this journey with mft online degrees that offer shorter completion times and flexible schedules.

Cost is a major factor when choosing your program. When considering a master’s in psychology, it’s important to ask, how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology? There are many affordable online options to help you move forward without incurring significant debt.

If you are aiming for educational leadership or higher administrative positions, fast and flexible edd programs online can help you achieve your goals more efficiently. Researching and comparing these pathways will ensure you select the right fit for your interests and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen J. Frenkel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles