World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen F. Chenoweth

Stephen F. Chenoweth

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
45
Citations
7016
World Ranking
4891
National Ranking
391

Stephen F. Chenoweth publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen F. Chenoweth sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 104 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stephen F. Chenoweth D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen F. Chenoweth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen F. Chenoweth is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research spans multiple areas within the biological sciences, with a focus on genetics, evolutionary biology, and insect science.

Their work predominantly falls within the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Subfields of study central to their research include Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Chenoweth's research covers several main topics such as Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Genetic Diversity and Population Structure, Evolution and Genetic Dynamics, Genetic and Phenotypic Traits in Livestock, Plant and Animal Studies, Insect Symbiosis and Bacterial Influences, and Mosquito-borne Diseases and Control.

Recent papers authored by Chenoweth include:

  • Natural variation at a single gene generates sexual antagonism across fitness components in Drosophila, 2022, Current Biology
  • Artificial Selection Finds New Hypotheses for the Mechanism of Wolbachia-Mediated Dengue Blocking in Mosquitoes, 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Dengue and chikungunya virus loads in the mosquito Aedes aegypti are determined by distinct genetic architectures, 2023, PLoS Pathogens
  • Integrating genomics and multivariate evolutionary quantitative genetics: a case study of constraints on sexual selection in Drosophila serrata, 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Genetic and social contributions to sex differences in lifespan in Drosophila serrata, 2022, Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Scott L. Allen
  • Adam J. Reddiex
  • Vikram P. Narayan
  • Alastair J. Wilson
  • Yiguan Wang

Chenoweth often publishes in venues focused on evolutionary biology and related disciplines. These venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Current Biology, PLoS Pathogens, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, and Frontiers in Microbiology.

Best Publications

  • Intralocus sexual conflict.

    Russell Bonduriansky;Stephen F. Chenoweth

  • Natural Selection and the Reinforcement of Mate Recognition

    Megan Higgie;Stephen Chenoweth;Mark W. Blows

  • Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits.

    Mark W. Blows;Stephen F. Chenoweth;Emma Hine

  • Contrasting Mutual Sexual Selection on Homologous Signal Traits in Drosophila serrata

    Stephen F. Chenoweth;Mark W. Blows

  • Divergent Selection and the Evolution of Signal Traits and Mating Preferences

    Howard D Rundle;Stephen F Chenoweth;Paul Doughty;Mark W Blows

  • Wolbachia Reduces the Transmission Potential of Dengue-Infected Aedes Aegypti

    Yixin H. Ye;Alison M. Carrasco;Francesca D. Frentiu;Stephen F. Chenoweth

  • Phenotypic divergence along lines of genetic variance.

    Katrina McGuigan;Stephen F. Chenoweth;Mark W. Blows

  • When oceans meet: A teleost shows secondary intergradation at an Indian-Pacific interface.

    S. F. Chenoweth;J. M. Hughes;C. P. Keenan;S. Lavery

  • The contribution of selection and genetic constraints to phenotypic divergence.

    Stephen F. Chenoweth;Howard D. Rundle;Mark W. Blows

  • THE ROLES OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION DURING ADAPTATION TO A NOVEL ENVIRONMENT

    Howard D. Rundle;Stephen F. Chenoweth;Mark W. Blows

  • The use of transcriptional profiles to predict adult mosquito age under field conditions.

    Peter E. Cook;Leon E. Hugo;Iñaki Iturbe-Ormaetxe;Craig R. Williams

  • Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits

    Donna Petfield;Stephen F. Chenoweth;Howard D. Rundle;Mark W. Blows

  • The Genomics of Sexual Conflict.

    Locke Rowe;Stephen F Chenoweth;Aneil F Agrawal

  • Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection.

    Stephen F. Chenoweth;Howard D. Rundle;Mark W. Blows

  • Concordance between dispersal and mitochondrial gene flow: isolation by distance in a tropical teleost, Lates calcarifer (Australian barramundi)

    Stephen F Chenoweth;Jane M Hughes;Clive P Keenan;Shane Lavery

  • Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata.

    Stephen F. Chenoweth;Mark W. Blows

  • Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: genetic variance in male sexually selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions.

    Emma Hine;Stephen F. Chenoweth;Mark W. Blows

  • Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?

    Stephen F. Chenoweth;Paul Doughty;Hanna Kokko;Hanna Kokko

  • Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice

    Stephen F. Chenoweth;Mark W. Blows

  • The origin and maintenance of metabolic allometry in animals.

    Craig R. White;Dustin J. Marshall;Lesley A. Alton;Lesley A. Alton;Pieter A. Arnold;Pieter A. Arnold

  • Sex-Specific Fitness Consequences of Nutrient Intake and the Evolvability of Diet Preferences

    Adam J. Reddiex;Thomas P. Gosden;Russell Bonduriansky;Stephen F. Chenoweth

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark W. Blows
Mark W. Blows University of Queensland
Howard D. Rundle
Howard D. Rundle University of Ottawa
Russell Bonduriansky
Russell Bonduriansky University of New South Wales
Jane M. Hughes
Jane M. Hughes Griffith University
Robbie S. Wilson
Robbie S. Wilson University of Queensland
Nigel W. Beebe
Nigel W. Beebe University of Queensland
Scott Leslie O'Neill
Scott Leslie O'Neill Monash University
Paul Doughty
Paul Doughty Western Australian Museum
Scott A. Ritchie
Scott A. Ritchie James Cook University
John Hunt
John Hunt Western Sydney University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a range of online degrees and career directions. Many students value flexibility and affordability while choosing programs, making non profit colleges a popular choice. These accredited institutions often offer competitive tuition rates and strong student support.

Active-duty military members and veterans should consider the best online colleges for military, which provide tailored resources, flexible coursework, and benefits that can facilitate a smooth transition into civilian careers in science or related fields.

If your interests extend beyond ecology, there are excellent opportunities to expand your skillset. For example, an online masters in social work can set the stage for jobs that connect communities with environmental change, while a fast track masters in psychology supports those interested in behavioral science as it relates to ecological challenges.

Taking these alternative or complementary pathways can broaden your career prospects, whether in research, policy, outreach, or interdisciplinary roles.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen F. Chenoweth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles