World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
23318
World Ranking
17543
National Ranking
8777

Scott D. Grosse publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Grosse sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 343 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Scott D. Grosse D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott D. Grosse sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott D. Grosse is affiliated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with specific attention to Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Epidemiology, Genetics, Economics and Econometrics, and General Health Professions.

They have contributed to studies spanning multiple fields and have explored key topics including Healthcare Policy and Management, Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research, Neonatal Health and Biochemistry, Metabolism and Genetic Disorders, Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research.

Frequent co-authors in Scott D. Grosse's research work include:

  • Alex R. Kemper
  • Jelili Ojodu
  • Melissa L. Danielson
  • Tatiana M. Lanzieri
  • Lisa A. Prosser

Notable publication venues where Scott D. Grosse has published multiple times are:

  • PEDIATRICS
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • Value in Health
  • Medical Care

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Scott D. Grosse include:

  • Economic assessments of the burden of congenital cytomegalovirus infection and the cost-effectiveness of prevention strategies, 2021, Seminars in Perinatology
  • Preterm birth lifetime costs in the United States in 2016: An update, 2021, Seminars in Perinatology
  • Trends in Stimulant Prescription Fills Among Commercially Insured Children and Adults - United States, 2016-2021, 2023, MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • Infant Mortality Attributable to Birth Defects - United States, 2003-2017, 2020, MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • Infants with Congenital Disorders Identified Through Newborn Screening - United States, 2015-2017, 2020, MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

Best Publications

  • New estimates of the prevalence of neurological and sensory sequelae and mortality associated with congenital cytomegalovirus infection.

    Sheila C. Dollard;Scott D. Grosse;Danielle S. Ross

  • Sickle cell disease in Africa: a neglected cause of early childhood mortality.

    Scott D. Grosse;Isaac Odame;Hani K. Atrash;Djesika D. Amendah

  • Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold.

    Scott D Grosse

  • Economic costs of mental retardation, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, and vision impairment

    Amanda A Honeycutt;Scott D Grosse;Laura J Dunlap;Diana E Schendel

  • Strategies for Implementing Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease

    Alex R. Kemper;William T. Mahle;Gerard R. Martin;W. Carl Cooley

  • Economic costs associated with mental retardation, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, and vision impairment --- United States, 2003

    D Schendel;S Grosse;G al Homsi;Hong Chen

  • Adjusting Health Expenditures for Inflation: A Review of Measures for Health Services Research in the United States

    Abe Dunn;Scott D. Grosse;Samuel H. Zuvekas

  • The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs

    Scott D. Grosse;Richard E. Nelson;Kwame A. Nyarko;Lisa C. Richardson

  • Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection as a cause of permanent bilateral hearing loss : A quantitative assessment

    Scott D. Grosse;Danielle S. Ross;Sheila C. Dollard

  • Economic gains resulting from the reduction in children's exposure to lead in the United States.

    Scott D Grosse;Thomas D Matte;Joel Schwartz;Richard J Jackson

  • Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: evaluation of benefits and risks and recommendations for state newborn screening programs.

    Scott D. Grosse;Coleen A. Boyle;Jeffrey R. Botkin;Anne Marie Comeau

  • Role of Pulse Oximetry in Examining Newborns for Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement from the AHA and AAP

    William T. Mahle;Jane W. Newburger;G. Paul Matherne;Frank C. Smith

  • What is the clinical utility of genetic testing

    Scott D Grosse;Muin J Khoury

  • The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer

    Mercy Mvundura;Scott D Grosse;Heather Hampel;Glenn E Palomaki

  • Role of Pulse Oximetry in Examining Newborns for Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics

    William T. Mahle;Jane W. Newburger;G. Paul Matherne;Frank C. Smith

  • Systematic review of the birth prevalence of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in developing countries

    Tatiana M. Lanzieri;Sheila C. Dollard;Stephanie R. Bialek;Scott D. Grosse

  • Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms and Child Maltreatment: A Population-Based Study

    Lijing Ouyang;Xiangming Fang;James A. Mercy;Ruth Perou

  • Medical Expenditures for Children with an Autism Spectrum Disorder in a Privately Insured Population

    Tom T. Shimabukuro;Scott D. Grosse;Catherine Rice

  • Prevention of intellectual disability through screening for congenital hypothyroidism: how much and at what level?

    Scott D Grosse;Guy Van Vliet

  • Emergency Department Visits Made by Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: A Descriptive Study, 1999–2007

    Hussain R. Yusuf;Hani K. Atrash;Scott D. Grosse;Christopher S. Parker

Frequent Co-Authors

Muin J. Khoury
Muin J. Khoury Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Russell S. Kirby
Russell S. Kirby University of South Florida
Craig A. Mason
Craig A. Mason University of Maine
Thomas N. Williams
Thomas N. Williams Imperial College London
Benjamin S. Wilfond
Benjamin S. Wilfond University of Washington
Margaret A. Honein
Margaret A. Honein Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Samuel H. Zuvekas
Samuel H. Zuvekas Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Nicholas J. Kassebaum
Nicholas J. Kassebaum University of Washington
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld University of Washington
Marni Brownell
Marni Brownell University of Manitoba

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical study options in the USA often extends beyond a traditional MD. Online nursing degrees create flexible opportunities for career advancement and specialization. For registered nurses aiming to upskill without extra time in clinical settings, online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements offer a convenient path to a bachelor’s degree while balancing work commitments.

For those seeking the highest level of nursing education, finding the shortest online dnp program can accelerate your journey into leadership or advanced practice roles. Cost is another big consideration—students can cut expenses by enrolling in the cheapest online dnp programs without sacrificing quality or accreditation.

Not everyone is ready to commit to years of study. A 6 month lpn program online is a fast-track alternative allowing you to start working in healthcare in a matter of months. These options open diverse pathways, making it easier to join or advance within the medical field—whether you’re starting out or aiming to reach the highest levels of nursing practice.

Best Scientists Citing Scott D. Grosse

Trending Scientists