World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
3910
World Ranking
9540
National Ranking
4028

David Wirtshafter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Wirtshafter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 104 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David Wirtshafter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Wirtshafter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Wirtshafter is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their research lies primarily within the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on specialized subfields including cellular and molecular neuroscience, endocrine and autonomic systems, and physiology.

Their work encompasses key topics such as neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, regulation of appetite and obesity, and biochemical effects in animals. These themes reflect a focus on understanding the biological mechanisms that underlie behavioral responses and physiological regulation.

Wirtshafter's publication record includes contributions to the journal JMIRx Bio, where they have published research related to neural pathways and motivation. One recent paper titled "Peer Review of 'Effects of Ventral Pallidum-Nucleus Accumbens Shell Neural Pathway Modulation on Sucrose Consumption and Motivation in Female Rats: Chemogenetic Manipulation Study'" was published in 2025 in JMIRx Bio.

  • Peer Review of "Effects of Ventral Pallidum-Nucleus Accumbens Shell Neural Pathway Modulation on Sucrose Consumption and Motivation in Female Rats: Chemogenetic Manipulation Study" (2025, JMIRx Bio)

Frequent co-authors information is not documented for this scientist, indicating that the available publication record may represent more independent or less collaborative research contributions.

Wirtshafter's scientific output and research topics indicate a concentrated effort to dissect neural and biochemical factors involved in appetite regulation and behavioral motivation, highlighting intersections between neuroscience and medical physiology.

Best Publications

  • Set points, settling points, and the control of body weight

    David Wirtshafter;John D. Davis

  • Sustained intracerebroventricular infusion of brain fuels reduces body weight and food intake in rats.

    John D. Davis;David Wirtshafter;Karen E. Asin;Deborah Brief

  • Dopamine agonists and stress produce different patterns of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the lateral habenula

    David Wirtshafter;Karen E. Asin;Mark R. Pitzer

  • Ascending dopaminergic projections from the dorsal raphe nucleus in the rat.

    Thomas R. Stratford;David Wirtshafter

  • Nicotine-induced behavioral sensitization is associated with extracellular dopamine release and expression of c-Fos in the striatum and nucleus accumbens of the rat.

    Insop Shim;Javaid I. Javaid;David Wirtshafter;Soo Yong Jang

  • Failure to establish a conditioned place preference with ethanol in rats.

    K.E. Asin;D. Wirtshafter;B. Tabakoff;B. Tabakoff

  • Evidence that electrolytic median raphe lesions increase locomotion but not exploration.

    David Wirtshafter;Karen E. Asin

  • Injections of muscimol into the paraventricular thalamic nucleus, but not mediodorsal thalamic nuclei, induce feeding in rats

    Thomas R. Stratford;David Wirtshafter

  • Localization of GABAB receptors in midbrain monoamine containing neurons in the rat

    David Wirtshafter;Amy C Sheppard

  • Electrolytic, but not 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine, lesions of the nucleus medianus raphe impair acquisition of a radial maze task.

    K.E. Asin;D. Wirtshafter;H.C. Fibiger

  • Interactive effects of stimulation of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors on fos-like immunoreactivity in the normosensitive rat striatum

    David Wirtshafter;Karen E. Asin

  • Body weight: reduction by long-term glycerol treatment.

    David Wirtshafter;John D. Davis

  • Studies on the behavioral activation produced by stimulation of GABAB receptors in the median raphe nucleus

    David Wirtshafter;Thomas R. Stratford;Mark R. Pitzer

  • The effects of electrolytic median raphe lesions on two measures of latent inhibition

    Karen E. Asin;David Wirtshafter;Ernest W. Kent

  • Straight alley acquisition and extinction and open field activity following discrete electrolytic lesions of the mesencephalic raphe nuclei.

    Karen E. Asin;David Wirtshafter;Ernest W. Kent

  • Effects of repeated dopamine D1 receptor stimulation on rotation and c-fos expression.

    Karen E. Asin;David Wirtshafter

  • Evidence that the nucleus accumbens shell, ventral pallidum, and lateral hypothalamus are components of a lateralized feeding circuit.

    Thomas R. Stratford;David Wirtshafter

  • Comparative studies of the ingestive behaviors produced by microinjections of muscimol into the midbrain raphe nuclei or the ventral tegmental area of the rat

    Klitenick Ma;Wirtshafter D

  • The control of ingestive behavior by the median raphe nucleus.

    D. Wirtshafter

  • Evidence that serotonergic projections to the substantia nigra in the rat arise in the dorsal, but not the median, raphe nucleus

    David Wirtshafter;Thomas R. Stratford;Karen E. Asin

  • Evidence against serotonin involvement in the hyperactivity produced by injections of muscimol into the median raphe nucleus.

    David Wirtshafter;Mark A. Klitenick;Karen E. Asin

  • Behavioral and biochemical evidence for a functional role of excitatory amino acids in the median raphe nucleus

    David Wirtshafter;Radmila Trifunovic;Joseph C. Krebs

Frequent Co-Authors

Boris Tabakoff
Boris Tabakoff University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Insop Shim
Insop Shim Kyung Hee University
Hans C. Fibiger
Hans C. Fibiger University of British Columbia
John Larson
John Larson University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With growing demand in neuroscience and related fields, students are increasingly considering flexible study options. An online bachelor's degree in neuroscience or biological sciences can be a practical choice for those balancing education with other commitments. These programs offer accelerated paths that can help you graduate faster and begin your career sooner.

Neuroscience intersects with several of the top 10 best bachelor degrees, such as computer science, engineering, and health sciences. Graduates with a neuroscience background often pursue lucrative roles in research, pharmaceuticals, healthcare technology, and beyond. In fact, many career options within neuroscience are highlighted among the most lucrative degrees available today.

For students concerned about costs, there are various cheapest online colleges that provide quality education and accept federal financial aid. Exploring these options can make pursuing a neuroscience degree both affordable and accessible, paving the way for diverse and rewarding career pathways in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing David Wirtshafter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles