World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
6692
World Ranking
8949
National Ranking
3787

Lee L. Bernardis publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee L. Bernardis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 175 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lee L. Bernardis D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee L. Bernardis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Correlation between 'Lee index' and carcass fat content in weanling and adult female rats with hypothalamic lesions.

    Unknown

  • The lateral hypothalamic area revisited: Ingestive behavior

    Lee L. Bernardis;Larry L. Bellinger

  • Growth Hormone and Insulin Levels in Weanling Rats with Ventromedial Hypothalamic Lesions

    Lawrence A. Frohman;Lee L. Bernardis

  • The lateral hypothalamic area revisited: neuroanatomy, body weight regulation, neuroendocrinology and metabolism.

    Lee L. Bernardis;Larry L. Bellinger;Larry L. Bellinger;Larry L. Bellinger

  • The dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus and its role in ingestive behavior and body weight regulation: lessons learned from lesioning studies.

    Larry L. Bellinger;Lee L. Bernardis

  • The dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus revisited: 1998 update.

    Lee L. Bernardis;Larry L. Bellinger

  • Prediction of carcass fat, water and lean body mass from Lee's "nutritive ratio" in rats with hypothalamic obesity.

    Bernardis Ll

  • The dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus revisited: 1986 update.

    Lee L. Bernardis;Larry L. Bellinger

  • Disruption of diurnal feeding and weight gain cycles in weanling rats by ventromedial and dorsomedial hypothalamic lesions.

    Lee L. Bernardis

  • Hypothalamic stimulation of growth hormone secretion.

    Lawrence A. Frohman;Lee L. Bernardis;kenneth J. Kant

  • Effect of Lesion Size in the Ventromedial Hypothalamus on Growth Hormone and Insulin Levels in Weanling Rats

    Lee L. Bernardis;Lawrence A. Frohman

  • Growth and Obesity Following Ventromedial Hypothalamic Lesions Placed in Female Rats at Four Different Ages

    Lee L. Bernardis;Floyd R. Skelton

  • Effects of ventromedial hypothalamic destruction in rats with preexisting streptozotocin-induced diabetes.

    Jack K. Goldman;Jack K. Goldman;J.David Schnatz;J.David Schnatz;Lee L. Bernardis;Lee L. Bernardis;Lawrence A. Frohman;Lawrence A. Frohman

  • Origin of endocrine‐metabolic changes in the weanling rat ventromedial syndrome

    Lee L. Bernardis;Jack K. Goldman

  • Effect of ventromedial and dorsomedial hypothalamic lesions on circadian corticosterone rhythms.

    L L Bellinger;L L Bernardis;V E Mendel

  • Participation of the dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus in the “feeding center” and water intake circuitry of the weanling rat

    Lee L. Bernardis

  • Effects of hypothalamic lesions at different loci on development of hyperinsulinemia and obesity in the weanling rat.

    Lee L. Bernardis;Lawrence A. Frohman

  • Failure to demonstrate an effect of dietary fatty acid composition on body weight, body composition and parameters of lipid metabolism in mature rats

    Atif B. Awad;Lee L. Bernardis;Carol S. Fink

  • Adipose tissue metabolism of weanling rats after destruction of ventromedial hypothalamic nuclei: Effect of hypophysectomy and growth hormone

    Jack K. Goldman;Jack K. Goldman;J.David Schnatz;J.David Schnatz;Lee L. Bernardis;Lee L. Bernardis;Lawrence A. Frohman;Lawrence A. Frohman

  • The dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus in autonomic and neuroendocrine homeostasis.

    Lee L. Bernardis

  • Suppression of feeding by cholecystokinin but not bombesin is attenuated in dorsomedial hypothalamic nuclei lesioned rats.

    Larry L. Bellinger;Lee L. Bernardis;Lee L. Bernardis

Frequent Co-Authors

Larry L. Bellinger
Larry L. Bellinger Texas A&M University
Lawrence A. Frohman
Lawrence A. Frohman University of Illinois at Chicago
Andrew V. Schally
Andrew V. Schally Veterans Health Administration
Akira Arimura
Akira Arimura Tulane University
Paul J. Davis
Paul J. Davis Albany Medical Center Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about neuroscience, several related online degrees can open rewarding career pathways in mental health and behavioral sciences. For those interested in professional counseling, pursuing cacrep accredited online programs is a key step. CACREP accreditation helps ensure your degree meets rigorous standards required for licensure and practice.

Career options also include clinical mental health counseling. Many students find that online clinical mental health counseling degrees provide flexibility and affordability, helping them balance learning with work or family responsibilities.

Those interested in working with families or couples may consider marriage and family therapy online programs accredited for quality training and licensure preparation. Additionally, an affordable online masters in clinical psychology offers broader options in assessment, therapy, and research settings.

Exploring these accredited and affordable programs can help you align your neuroscience studies with a fulfilling, impactful career path in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Lee L. Bernardis