World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
27391
World Ranking
15039
National Ranking
7602

Lawrence A. Frohman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Frohman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 362 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lawrence A. Frohman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Frohman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence A. Frohman was affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Over the course of their career, they contributed to the academic community through research and teaching.

Details on their publication record, including recent papers, are not available. Similarly, information on frequent co-authors, regular publication venues, or book publications is not provided.

Although specific fields of study, subfields, and research topics are not documented, the scientist's work likely intersected with areas relevant to their institutional and disciplinary context.

There is no recorded data regarding awards or honors received by Lawrence A. Frohman during their career.

Due to the absence of detailed information on research output and scientific focus, their precise academic impact and specialization within their broader discipline remain unspecified.

Best Publications

  • Secretagogues and the somatotrope: signaling and proliferation.

    L A Frohman;R D Kineman;J Kamegai;S Park

  • Enhanced Growth of Mice Lacking the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor Function of p27Kip1

    Hiroaki Kiyokawa;Rhonda D Kineman;Katia O Manova-Todorova;Vera C Soares

  • Criteria for cure of acromegaly: a consensus statement.

    Andrea Giustina;Ariel Barkan;Felipe F. Casanueva;Franco Cavagnini

  • Somatomedin-C mediates growth hormone negative feedback by effects on both the hypothalamus and the pituitary

    Michael Berelowitz;Marta Szabo;Lawrence A. Frohman;Susan Firestone

  • Impaired growth hormone responses to growth hormone-releasing factor in obesity. A pituitary defect reversed with weight reduction.

    Timothy Williams;Michael Berelowitz;Stephen N. Joffe;Michael O. Thorner

  • Thyroid cancer occurring as a late consequence of head-and-neck irradiation. Evaluation of 1056 patients.

    M. J. Favus;A. B. Schneider;M. E. Stachura;J. E. Arnold

  • Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone

    Lawrence A. Frohman;John-Olov Jansson

  • Guidelines for Acromegaly Management

    S. Melmed;F. F. Casanueva;F. Cavagnini;P. Chanson

  • Octreotide Treatment of Acromegaly: A Randomized, Multicenter Study

    Shereen Ezzat;Peter J. Snyder;William Francis Young;Louis D. Boyajy

  • The role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein gene in familial and sporadic pituitary adenomas.

    Chrysanthia A. Leontiou;Maria Gueorguiev;Jacqueline van der Spuy;Richard Quinton

  • Safety and efficacy of long-term octreotide therapy of acromegaly: Results of a multicenter trial in 103 patients—a clinical research center study

    C B Newman;S Melmed;P J Snyder;W F Young

  • Treatment of Pituitary-Dependent Cushing’s Disease with the Multireceptor Ligand Somatostatin Analog Pasireotide (SOM230): A Multicenter, Phase II Trial

    M. Boscaro;W. H. Ludlam;B. Atkinson;J. E. Glusman

  • Effect of vagotomy and vagal stimulation on insulin secretion.

    Lawrence A Frohman;Ediz Z Ezdinli;Rouhollah Javid

  • Ovarian Function in Chronic Renal Failure: Evidence Suggesting Hypothalamic Anovulation

    Victoria S. Lim;Carlos Henriquez;Grant Sievertsen;Lawrence A. Frohman

  • Octreotide as primary therapy for acromegaly

    Connie B. Newman;Shlomo Melmed;Ajax George;Drew Torigian

  • Consensus statement: medical management of acromegaly

    S Melmed;F Casanueva;F Cavagnini;P Chanson

  • Dipeptidylpeptidase IV and trypsin-like enzymatic degradation of human growth hormone-releasing hormone in plasma.

    L A Frohman;T R Downs;E P Heimer;A M Felix

  • Regulation of growth hormone secretion.

    L A Frohman;T R Downs;P Chomczynski

  • Metabolic clearance and secretion rates of human prolactin in normal subjects and in patients with chronic renal failure.

    Grant D. Sievertsen;Victoria S. Lim;Charlotte Nakawatase;Lawrence A. Frohman

  • Rapid enzymatic degradation of growth hormone-releasing hormone by plasma in vitro and in vivo to a biologically inactive product cleaved at the NH2 terminus.

    L A Frohman;T R Downs;T C Williams;E P Heimer

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael O. Thorner
Michael O. Thorner University of Virginia
Shlomo Melmed
Shlomo Melmed Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Márta Korbonits
Márta Korbonits Queen Mary University of London
Mary Lee Vance
Mary Lee Vance University of Virginia
Ashley B. Grossman
Ashley B. Grossman University of Oxford
Wylie Vale
Wylie Vale Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Jean Rivier
Jean Rivier Salk Institute for Biological Studies
John J. Kopchick
John J. Kopchick Ohio University
Ken K. Y. Ho
Ken K. Y. Ho University of Pittsburgh
Carlos Dieguez
Carlos Dieguez University of Santiago de Compostela

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn’t always follow a traditional path. Numerous direct entry np programs for non nurses online offer a fast track for individuals with a non-nursing background to become nurse practitioners. These programs allow students to enter the healthcare field without starting from scratch.

For those seeking accessible entry points, there are also easiest rn program options that have more flexible admission requirements. These schools can be ideal for students who may not have a perfect academic record but are passionate about nursing.

Not all healthcare roles require direct patient care. Careers in medical administration are expanding, with many turning to medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa. These online programs often have strong job placement rates and make financial aid accessible.

Some students may wish to bypass standardized testing requirements. There are several nursing programs without teas or HESI exam requirements, removing a common barrier to nursing education and offering a smoother path forward.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence A. Frohman