World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
10646
World Ranking
5176
National Ranking
1904

Sami W. Asmar publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sami W. Asmar sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 281 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Sami W. Asmar D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sami W. Asmar sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sami W. Asmar is affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research activity is concentrated primarily in the fields of Physics and Astronomy, with a strong focus on subfields including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, Oceanography, Ecology, and Atmospheric Science. The scientist's work often intersects key topics such as Planetary Science and Exploration, Astro and Planetary Science, Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology, Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life, Geophysics and Gravity Measurements, Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae, and Spacecraft Design and Technology.

Their recent publications demonstrate engagement with planetary science and space missions. Notable papers include:

  • Initial results from the InSight mission on Mars, 2020, Nature Geoscience
  • Report on First Inflight Data of BepiColombo's Mercury Orbiter Radio Science Experiment, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems
  • Gravity, Geodesy and Fundamental Physics with BepiColombo's MORE Investigation, 2021, Space Science Reviews
  • Improving Small Satellite Communications and Tracking in Deep Space-A Review of the Existing Systems and Technologies With Recommendations for Improvement. Part II: Small Satellite Navigation, Proximity Links, and Communications Link Science, 2020, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine
  • MOSAIC: A Satellite Constellation to Enable Groundbreaking Mars Climate System Science and Prepare for Human Exploration, 2021, The Planetary Science Journal

The publication venues where Sami W. Asmar most frequently contributes include:

  • The Planetary Science Journal
  • Acta Astronautica
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Nature Geoscience
  • IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Frequent collaborators in their research include L. Iess, Antonio Genova, R. A. Preston, Paolo Cappuccio, and Ivan di Stefano, each with multiple joint publications.

The scientist's research output indicates a multidisciplinary approach connected to ongoing efforts in space missions, satellite technology, geodesy, and planetary exploration. This includes detailed study of gravity and geophysics on other planets as well as efforts in improving communication technologies for small satellites operating in deep space.

Best Publications

  • The Crust of the Moon as Seen by GRAIL

    Mark A. Wieczorek;Gregory A. Neumann;Francis Nimmo;Walter S. Kiefer

  • Dawn at Vesta: Testing the Protoplanetary Paradigm

    C. T. Russell;C. A. Raymond;A. Coradini;H. Y. McSween

  • Gravity field of the Moon from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission.

    Maria T. Zuber;David E. Smith;Michael M. Watkins;Sami W. Asmar

  • Recent Gravity Models as a Result of the Lunar Prospector Mission

    A. S. Konopliv;S. W. Asmar;E. Carranza;W. L. Sjogren

  • The Gravity Field and Interior Structure of Enceladus

    L. Iess;D. J. Stevenson;M. Parisi;D. Hemingway

  • Mars high resolution gravity fields from MRO, Mars seasonal gravity, and other dynamical parameters

    Alex S. Konopliv;Sami W. Asmar;William M. Folkner;Özgür Karatekin

  • Initial results from the InSight mission on Mars

    W. Bruce Banerdt;Suzanne E. Smrekar;Don Banfield;Domenico Giardini

  • A homogeneous nucleus for comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from its gravity field

    M Pätzold;T. Andert;Matthias Hahn;S.W. Asmar

  • Gravity Field, Shape, and Moment of Inertia of Titan

    Luciano Iess;Nicole J. Rappaport;Robert A. Jacobson;Paolo Racioppa

  • Lunar impact basins revealed by Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory measurements

    Gregory A. Neumann;Maria Zuber;Mark A. Wieczorek;James W. Head

  • Lunar interior properties from the GRAIL mission

    James G. Williams;Alexander S. Konopliv;Dale H. Boggs;Ryan S. Park

  • The JPL lunar gravity field to spherical harmonic degree 660 from the GRAIL Primary Mission

    Alex S. Konopliv;Ryan S. Park;Dah-Ning Yuan;Sami W. Asmar

  • The vertical profile of winds on Titan

    M. K. Bird;M. Allison;S. W. Asmar;D. H. Atkinson

  • Ancient Igneous Intrusions and Early Expansion of the Moon Revealed by GRAIL Gravity Gradiometry

    Jeffrey C. Andrews-Hanna;Sami W. Asmar;James W. Head;Walter S. Kiefer

  • The structure of Venus’ middle atmosphere and ionosphere

    M. Pätzold;B. Häusler;M. K. Bird;S. Tellmann

  • High-resolution lunar gravity fields from the GRAIL Primary and Extended Missions

    Alex S. Konopliv;Ryan S. Park;Dah-Ning Yuan;Sami W. Asmar

  • Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL): Mapping the Lunar Interior from Crust to Core

    Maria T. Zuber;David E. Smith;David H. Lehman;Tom L. Hoffman

  • Radio science observations with Mars Global Surveyor: Orbit insertion through one Mars year in mapping orbit

    G. Leonard Tyler;Georges Balmino;David P. Hinson;William L. Sjogren

  • Detection of Titan's Ionosphere from Voyager 1 Radio Occultation Observations

    M.K. Bird;R. Dutta-Roy;S.W. Asmar;T.A. Rebold

  • The Vesta gravity field, spin pole and rotation period, landmark positions, and ephemeris from the Dawn tracking and optical data

    A.S. Konopliv;S.W. Asmar;R.S. Park;B.G. Bills

  • Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL): Mapping the Lunar Interior from Crust to Core

    David H. Lehman;Tom L. Hoffman;Sami W. Asmar;Michael M. Watkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher T. Russell
Christopher T. Russell University of California, Los Angeles
Sean C. Solomon
Sean C. Solomon Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Mark A. Wieczorek
Mark A. Wieczorek Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Francis Nimmo
Francis Nimmo University of California, Santa Cruz
Roger J. Phillips
Roger J. Phillips Washington University in St. Louis
Gregory A. Neumann
Gregory A. Neumann Goddard Space Flight Center
Ralf Jaumann
Ralf Jaumann Freie Universität Berlin
Michael M. Watkins
Michael M. Watkins California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, often requiring complementary skills and interdisciplinary knowledge. For instance, an online geoscience degree can deepen your understanding of Earth systems, a crucial aspect of environmental studies.

Additionally, expertise in digital mapping and spatial data analysis is increasingly valuable. Pursuing a geographic information systems degree equips students with tools to visualize and manage environmental data effectively.

For those interested in policy, leadership, and public administration within environmental sectors, accelerated 1 year MPA programs offer a fast track to developing crucial managerial skills.

Furthermore, understanding societal dynamics enhances environmental impact assessments. An best online sociology bachelor degree can provide insights into human behavior and communities, an essential component in creating sustainable solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Sami W. Asmar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles