World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
82
Citations
21948
World Ranking
3730
National Ranking
1851

Richard J. Hodes publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Hodes sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 326 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard J. Hodes D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Hodes sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Distinguished Fellows of the American Association of Immunologists (AAI)
  • 2017 - AAI Lifetime Achievement Award, American Association of Immunologists
  • 2017 - American Association of Immunologists Lifetime Achievement Award
  • 1999 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Richard J. Hodes is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields primarily focused on immunology and microbiology, with significant contributions in medicine.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Immunology and Microbiology
  • Medicine

Subfields they have contributed to are:

  • Immunology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Physiology

Key topics within their research include:

  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health disparities and outcomes

They have published extensively in specific venues, including:

  • The Journal of Immunology
  • Innovation in Aging
  • American Journal of Public Health
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • New England Journal of Medicine

Frequent co-authors in their publications are:

  • Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable
  • S. Celli
  • Tara A. Schwetz
  • Masashi Watanabe
  • Max Xu

Recent papers include:

  • "Rapid Scaling Up of Covid-19 Diagnostic Testing in the United States - The NIH RADx Initiative" (2020), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "A Blueprint for Characterizing Senescence" (2020), published in Cell
  • "The All of Us Research Program is an opportunity to enhance the diversity of US biomedical research" (2024), published in Nature Medicine
  • "B7-CD28 co-stimulation modulates central tolerance via thymic clonal deletion and Treg generation through distinct mechanisms" (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • "Harnessing the Power of Community-Engaged Science to Facilitate Access and Uptake of COVID-19 Testing: RADx-UP" (2022), published in American Journal of Public Health

Richard J. Hodes has received several awards, including:

  • Distinguished Fellows of the American Association of Immunologists (AAI), 2019
  • American Association of Immunologists Lifetime Achievement Award, 2017
  • AAI Lifetime Achievement Award, American Association of Immunologists, 2017
  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), 1999
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1997

Best Publications

  • Comparative analysis of B7-1 and B7-2 costimulatory ligands: expression and function.

    K S Hathcock;G Laszlo;C Pucillo;P Linsley

  • The tissue distribution of the B7-2 costimulator in mice: abundant expression on dendritic cells in situ and during maturation in vitro.

    K Inaba;M Witmer-Pack;M Inaba;K S Hathcock

  • Identification of an alternative CTLA-4 ligand costimulatory for T cell activation

    Karen S. Hathcock;Gloria Laszlo;Howard B. Dickler;Jeff Bradshaw

  • Cellular interaction in germinal centers. Roles of CD40 ligand and B7-2 in established germinal centers.

    Shuhua Han;K. Hathcock;Biao Zheng;T. B. Kepler

  • Regulated expression of telomerase activity in human T lymphocyte development and activation.

    N P Weng;B L Levine;C H June;R J Hodes

  • Murine B7-2, an alternative CTLA4 counter-receptor that costimulates T cell proliferation and interleukin 2 production.

    G J Freeman;F Borriello;R J Hodes;H Reiser

  • Uncovering of functional alternative CTLA-4 counter-receptor in B7-deficient mice

    Gordon J. Freeman;Frank Borriello;Richard J. Hodes;Hans Reiser

  • Human naive and memory T lymphocytes differ in telomeric length and replicative potential.

    Nan-Ping Weng;Bruce L. Levine;Carl H. June;Richard J. Hodes

  • Regulation of immunostimulatory function and costimulatory molecule (B7-1 and B7-2) expression on murine dendritic cells.

    C P Larsen;S C Ritchie;R Hendrix;P S Linsley

  • Telomere Length of Transferred Lymphocytes Correlates with In Vivo Persistence and Tumor Regression in Melanoma Patients Receiving Cell Transfer Therapy

    Juhua Zhou;Xinglei Shen;Jianping Huang;Richard J. Hodes

  • Telomere lengthening and telomerase activation during human B cell differentiation

    Nan-ping Weng;Lawrence Granger;Richard J. Hodes

  • Telomeres in T and B cells

    Richard J. Hodes;Karen S. Hathcock;Nan-ping Weng

  • Cutting Edge: Telomerase Activation in Human T Lymphocytes Does Not Require Increase in Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (hTERT) Protein But Is Associated with hTERT Phosphorylation and Nuclear Translocation

    Kebin Liu;Richard J. Hodes;Nan-ping Weng

  • Constitutive and regulated expression of telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in human lymphocytes

    Kebin Liu;Michele M. Schoonmaker;Bruce L. Levine;Carl H. June

  • Tales of tails: regulation of telomere length and telomerase activity during lymphocyte development, differentiation, activation, and aging.

    Nan-ping Weng;Larry D. Palmer;Bruce L Levine;H. Clifford Lane

  • Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children

    George A. Gates;Kathleen Daly;William J. Dichtel;Robert J. Dooling

  • Lineage-Specific Telomere Shortening and Unaltered Capacity for Telomerase Expression in Human T and B Lymphocytes with Age

    Ni Huiping Son;Shannon Murray;Jack Yanovski;Richard J. Hodes

  • Stepwise Differentiation of CD4 Memory T Cells Defined by Expression of CCR7 and CD27

    Ruth D. Fritsch;Xinglei Shen;Gary P. Sims;Karen S. Hathcock

  • Transcriptome analysis of mouse stem cells and early embryos.

    Alexei A Sharov;Yulan Piao;Ryo Matoba;Dawood B Dudekula

  • Inhibition of transplant rejection following treatment with anti-B7-2 and anti-B7-1 antibodies.

    D. J. Lenschow;Yijun Zeng;K. S. Hathcock;L. A. Zuckerman

Frequent Co-Authors

Alfred Singer
Alfred Singer National Institutes of Health
Susan O. Sharrow
Susan O. Sharrow National Institutes of Health
David H. Sachs
David H. Sachs Columbia University
Carl H. June
Carl H. June University of Pennsylvania
Jeffrey A. Bluestone
Jeffrey A. Bluestone University of California, San Francisco
Steven A. Rosenberg
Steven A. Rosenberg National Institutes of Health
Shinya Murakami
Shinya Murakami Osaka University
Lino Tessarollo
Lino Tessarollo National Institutes of Health
Paul A. Sieving
Paul A. Sieving University of California, Davis
Anthony Wynshaw-Boris
Anthony Wynshaw-Boris Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Biology and Biochemistry graduates in the USA have access to a wide variety of related online degrees and career opportunities. One popular option is pursuing an mba healthcare management online degree. With this advanced credential, you can develop leadership skills and move into management roles within the booming healthcare industry.

Additionally, many students consider certification programs that focus on healthcare data and administration. For example, it’s useful to compare ccs certification with other common credentials to better understand which certification aligns with your long-term goals. Medical coding is a particularly in-demand field, and those who become certified can expect competitive compensation—learn more about certified medical coder salary trends and career growth potential.

Finally, if you’re interested in the intersection of healthcare, technology, and administration, explore the medical billing and coding outlook. This career pathway offers strong job stability and remote work possibilities, making it attractive for Biology and Biochemistry graduates seeking flexible options beyond traditional lab roles.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Hodes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles