World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
70
Citations
17268
World Ranking
2421
National Ranking
1160

Susan O. Sharrow publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan O. Sharrow sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 175 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Susan O. Sharrow D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan O. Sharrow sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susan O. Sharrow is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on immunology, with specific attention to subfields within immunology that cover T-cell and B-cell immunology, immune cell function and interaction, and immunotherapy and immune responses.

The main topics of their work include:

  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses

Sharrow has contributed to the field through publications in notable venues. Their frequent publication venue is Nature Immunology, reflecting engagement with high-impact research communities in immunology and microbiology.

One of their recent papers is titled "How autoreactive thymocytes differentiate into regulatory versus effector CD4+ T cells after avoiding clonal deletion," published in 2023 in Nature Immunology.

Frequent collaborators in Sharrow's research include:

  • Xuguang Tai
  • Alyssa Indart
  • Mirelle Rojano
  • Jie Guo
  • Nicolai Apenes

Their work sits at the intersection of immunology and microbiology, emphasizing the cellular and molecular mechanisms that govern immune system regulation, particularly relating to T cells. The published research addresses the differentiation pathways of autoreactive thymocytes, investigating how these cells avoid clonal deletion and instead develop into regulatory or effector T cells, which are critical processes for immune tolerance and response.

Susan O. Sharrow's contributions align with ongoing scientific efforts to better understand immune cell dynamics and the mechanisms underpinning immune responses and therapies, as indicated by their specialization in immunotherapy and immune responses in addition to fundamental immunological functions.

Best Publications

  • Human memory T lymphocytes express increased levels of three cell adhesion molecules (LFA-3, CD2, and LFA-1) and three other molecules (UCHL1, CDw29, and Pgp-1) and have enhanced IFN-gamma production.

    M E Sanders;M W Makgoba;S O Sharrow;D Stephany

  • In vivo administration of purified human interleukin 2. II. Half life, immunologic effects, and expansion of peripheral lymphoid cells in vivo with recombinant IL 2.

    M. T. Lotze;Y. L. Matory;S. E. Ettinghausen;A. A. Rayner

  • Immunoglobulin gene rearrangement and cell surface antigen expression in acute lymphocytic leukemias of T cell and B cell precursor origins.

    S J Korsmeyer;A Arnold;A Bakhshi;J V Ravetch

  • Expression of interleukin 2 receptors on activated human B cells.

    Thomas A. Waldmann;Carolyn K. Goldman;Richard J. Robb;Joel M. Depper

  • Determination of surface antigens on highly purified human NK cells by flow cytometry with monoclonal antibodies.

    J R Ortaldo;S O Sharrow;T Timonen;R B Herberman

  • In vivo administration of purified human interleukin 2. I. Half-life and immunologic effects of the Jurkat cell line-derived interleukin 2

    M T Lotze;L W Frana;S O Sharrow;R J Robb

  • Thymic-independent T cell regeneration occurs via antigen-driven expansion of peripheral T cells resulting in a repertoire that is limited in diversity and prone to skewing.

    Crystal L. Mackall;Catherine V. Bare;Larry A. Granger;Susan O. Sharrow

  • Texas red, a hydrophilic, red-emitting flourophore for use with flourescein in dual parameter flow microfluorometric and fluorescence microscopic studies

    Julie A. Titus;Richard Haugland;Susan O. Sharrow;David M. Segal

  • Negative selection of CD4+CD8+ thymocytes by T cell receptor-induced apoptosis requires a costimulatory signal that can be provided by CD28

    J A Punt;B A Osborne;Y Takahama;S O Sharrow

  • Coreceptor Reversal in the Thymus: Signaled CD4+8+ Thymocytes Initially Terminate CD8 Transcription Even When Differentiating into CD8+ T Cells

    Enrico Brugnera;Avinash Bhandoola;Ricardo Cibotti;Qing Yu

  • Characterization of murine thymocytes with CDS-associated T-cell receptor structures

    Jeffrey A. Bluestone;Drew Pardoll;Susan O. Sharrow;B. J. Fowlkes

  • Functional and phenotypic comparison of human T cell leukemia/lymphoma virus positive adult T cell leukemia with human T cell leukemia/lymphoma virus negative Sézary leukemia, and their distinction using anti-Tac. Monoclonal antibody identifying the human receptor for T cell growth factor.

    T A Waldmann;W C Greene;P S Sarin;C Saxinger

  • Basis of CTLA-4 function in regulatory and conventional CD4+ T cells

    Xuguang Tai;François Van Laethem;Leonid Pobezinsky;Terry Guinter

  • B-lymphocyte heterogeneity: development and characterization of an alloantiserum which distinguishes B-lymphocyte differentiation alloantigens.

    Aftab Ahmed;Irwin Scher;Susan O Sharrow;Allan H Smith

  • Cell cycle of Saccharomycescerevisiae in populations growing at different rates

    Martin L. Slater;Susan O. Sharrow;John J. Gart

  • Phenotype, specificity, and function of T cell subsets and T cell interactions involved in skin allograft rejection.

    A S Rosenberg;T Mizuochi;S O Sharrow;A Singer

  • Role of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the prevention of lupus-like disease occurring in a murine model of graft-vs-host disease.

    C S Via;S O Sharrow;G M Shearer

  • Therapy of patients with human T-cell lymphotrophic virus I-induced adult T-cell leukemia with anti-Tac, a monoclonal antibody to the receptor for interleukin-2

    Thomas A. Waldmann;Carolyn K. Goldman;Kathleen F. Bongiovanni;Susan O. Sharrow

  • Deletion of CD4 and CD8 Coreceptors Permits Generation of αβT Cells that Recognize Antigens Independently of the MHC

    François Van Laethem;Sophia D. Sarafova;Jung-Hyun Park;Xuguang Tai

  • DNA-damage-induced differentiation of leukaemic cells as an anti-cancer barrier

    Margarida A. Santos;Robert B. Faryabi;Aysegul V. Ergen;Amanda M. Day

  • Enhanced antigen-presenting capacity of cultured Langerhans' cells is associated with markedly increased expression of Ia antigen.

    S Shimada;S W Caughman;S O Sharrow;D Stephany

Frequent Co-Authors

Alfred Singer
Alfred Singer National Institutes of Health
David H. Sachs
David H. Sachs Columbia University
Richard J. Hodes
Richard J. Hodes National Institutes of Health
Yousuke Takahama
Yousuke Takahama National Institutes of Health
William E. Paul
William E. Paul National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Gene M. Shearer
Gene M. Shearer National Institutes of Health
Carolyn K. Goldman
Carolyn K. Goldman National Institutes of Health
Thomas A. Waldmann
Thomas A. Waldmann National Institutes of Health
Irwin Scher
Irwin Scher OperTechBio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in immunology, related health science degrees can open doors to diverse career paths. Accelerated nursing programs are a popular choice for students seeking fast-track entry into healthcare. If you want to ease into nursing, consider exploring absn programs with high acceptance rates, which provide efficient pathways with greater accessibility.

Many students also opt for licensure as a practical nurse, finding accredited lpn programs easy to get into. These programs typically have flexible online options, ideal for balancing study with other commitments.

For advanced practice, nurse practitioner degrees are a strong step forward. Among the options, understanding which nurse practitioner program is easiest can help you identify programs that fit your academic strengths and career goals.

Specifically, psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner credentials are in high demand. The best online pmhnp programs offer strong clinical placements, enabling practical experience essential for success in specialized healthcare roles.

Best Scientists Citing Susan O. Sharrow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles