World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
86148
World Ranking
7138
National Ranking
1931

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 83 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve is affiliated with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in the United States. Their research encompasses various domains within physical sciences, focusing particularly on materials science, chemistry, and physics and astronomy.

Their work spans multiple subfields of study, including materials chemistry, spectroscopy, and atomic and molecular physics and optics. These interdisciplinary areas highlight a range of scientific approaches and techniques applied in their research activities.

They have contributed to topics covering crystallization and solubility studies, analytical chemistry and chromatography, as well as spectroscopy and quantum chemical studies. These topics indicate an involvement in both experimental and theoretical aspects of chemical and physical analysis.

Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve has published research primarily in the venue Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology, reflecting a focus on structural biology as well as crystallographic methods.

  • Bulk-solvent and overall scaling revisited: faster calculations, improved results. Corrigendum., 2023, Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology

Their frequent collaborators include Pavel V. Afonine, Paul D. Adams, and Alexandre Urzhumtsev, indicating active engagement in collaborative research projects within their scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Phenix - a comprehensive python-based system for macromolecular structure solution

    Paul D Adams;Paul D Adams;Pavel Afonine;Gábor Bunkóczi;Vincent B Chen

  • Phaser crystallographic software

    Airlie J. McCoy;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Paul D. Adams;Martyn D. Winn

  • Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine

    Pavel V. Afonine;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Nathaniel Echols;Jeffrey J. Headd

  • PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination

    Paul D Adams;Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve;Li Wei Hung;Thomas R Ioerger

  • Likelihood-enhanced fast translation functions.

    Airlie J. McCoy;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Laurent C. Storoni;Randy J. Read

  • Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the PHENIX AutoBuild wizard

    Thomas C Terwilliger;Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve;Pavel V Afonine;Nigel W Moriarty

  • electronic Ligand Builder and Optimization Workbench (eLBOW): a tool for ligand coordinate and restraint generation

    Nigel W. Moriarty;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Paul D. Adams;Paul D. Adams

  • Decision-making in structure solution using Bayesian estimates of map quality: the PHENIX AutoSol wizard

    Thomas C Terwilliger;Paul D Adams;Randy J Read;Airlie J McCoy

  • Automated Structure Solution with the PHENIX Suite

    Peter H. Zwart;Pavel V. Afonine;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Li-Wei Hung

  • Simultaneous Femtosecond X-ray Spectroscopy and Diffraction of Photosystem II at Room Temperature

    Jan Kern;Jan Kern;Roberto Alonso-Mori;Rosalie Tran;Johan Hattne

  • Recent developments in the PHENIX software for automated crystallographic structure determination

    Paul D. Adams;Kreshna Gopal;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Li-Wei Hung

  • The Computational Crystallography Toolbox: crystallographic algorithms in a reusable software framework

    Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Nicholas K. Sauter;Nigel W. Moriarty;Paul D. Adams

  • Joint X-ray and neutron refinement with phenix.refine

    Pavel V. Afonine;Marat Mustyakimov;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Nigel W. Moriarty

  • Substructure search procedures for macromolecular structures

    Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Paul D. Adams

  • New tools for structure refinement in PHENIX

    Paul Adams;Pavel Afonine;Nat Echols;Jeff Headd

  • Use of knowledge-based restraints in phenix.refine to improve macromolecular refinement at low resolution.

    Jeffrey J. Headd;Nathaniel Echols;Pavel V. Afonine;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

  • iotbx.cif: a comprehensive CIF toolbox.

    Richard J. Gildea;Richard J. Gildea;Luc J. Bourhis;Oleg V. Dolomanov;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

  • Iterative-build OMIT maps: map improvement by iterative model building and refinement without model bias.

    Thomas C. Terwilliger;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Pavel V. Afonine;Nigel W. Moriarty

  • Nanoflow electrospinning serial femtosecond crystallography

    Raymond G Sierra;Hartawan Laksmono;Jan Kern;Rosalie Tran

  • Robust indexing for automatic data collection

    Nicholas K. Sauter;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Paul D. Adams

  • A robust bulk-solvent correction and anisotropic scaling procedure

    Pavel V. Afonine;Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve;Paul D. Adams

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul D. Adams
Paul D. Adams Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Pavel V. Afonine
Pavel V. Afonine Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Thomas C. Terwilliger
Thomas C. Terwilliger Los Alamos National Laboratory
Randy J. Read
Randy J. Read University of Cambridge
Uwe Bergmann
Uwe Bergmann SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Johannes Messinger
Johannes Messinger Umeå University
Dimosthenis Sokaras
Dimosthenis Sokaras SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Junko Yano
Junko Yano Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jan Kern
Jan Kern Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
David C. Richardson
David C. Richardson Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Engineering and Technology opens doors to a variety of allied fields and career pathways. Online education has made it easier for students and professionals to expand their expertise and credentials alongside their current commitments.

For those interested in innovation and launching businesses, the best mba for entrepreneurship programs deliver essential leadership and business skills. Additionally, flexible online mba programs no gmat let candidates skip standardized testing, making advanced business study more accessible.

If you’re drawn to overseeing technical teams and complex projects, pursuing a project manager degree online can bolster your credentials for roles in diverse industries, including engineering, IT, and construction.

Engineering and Technology graduates might also find exciting opportunities in property and infrastructure. Accredited real estate degree programs help students understand the business, legal, and technical aspects of the real estate industry.

By exploring these related online degrees, students can build versatile skill sets, enhance job prospects, and adapt to a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles